Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Artem wrote:
On Mar 15, 12:28 am, K7ITM wrote: On Mar 14, 2:15 pm, Artem wrote: Yes...very good. That should help keep the loop nicely balanced, especially if you build it all very symmetrical. That one more tube Hi. I have some problem. I can't receive nothing except noise And self oscillation frequency. I have some photos. Could any give me some suggestions? Antenna: http://artembond.no-ip.info/apache2-...t/DSC_9427.JPG Chematics: http://artembond.no-ip.info/apache2-...t/DSC_9431.JPG Amplifier: http://artembond.no-ip.info/apache2-...t/DSC_9426.JPG I think you need to narrow band those photos. greg |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 20, 10:07 pm, (GregS) wrote:
In article , Artem wrote: I think you need to narrow band those photos. Sorry for hosting. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:58:02 -0700 (PDT), Artem
wrote: Hi. I have some problem. I can't receive nothing except noise And self oscillation frequency. Try choking both what are labeled "RF Out" and "Shield Cable." 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 20, 12:58 pm, Artem wrote:
On Mar 15, 12:28 am, K7ITM wrote: On Mar 14, 2:15 pm, Artem wrote: Yes...very good. That should help keep the loop nicely balanced, especially if you build it all very symmetrical. That one more tube Hi. I have some problem. I can't receive nothing except noise And self oscillation frequency. I have some photos. Could any give me some suggestions? Antenna:http://artembond.no-ip.info/apache2-...t/DSC_9427.JPG Chematics:http://artembond.no-ip.info/apache2-...t/DSC_9431.JPG Amplifier:http://artembond.no-ip.info/apache2-...t/DSC_9426.JPG :-) I saw the comment about "narrow-banding" the images. They were perhaps a little more than we needed, but it was nice to have something we could actually see. They did not take very long to download here, but someone with a slow connection may have troubles. One comment: usually you do not need much voltage gain. It is enough to get power gain with the FETs. That is, the received signal voltage across the gap of the loop, as resonated by the capacitors, should be high enough to be used with a good receiver. The problem is that the impedance is very high there. But that same high impedance makes for easy oscillation. From what you posted, it sounds like maybe you have identified an oscillation. If the AGC voltage is low enough, does the oscillation stop? The amplifier I built used two stages, an FET input stage and a buffer stage, and it had very low voltage gain--I am remembering about 3:1 or only 10dB, and maybe only 1:1 or 0dB including the output transformer, but quite a bit of power gain since it transformed the high loop impedance down to 50 ohms for the feedline. Also, there should be no need for the RF chokes from the gate-1 to source, if the loop is grounded at the bottom. If the loop is grounded at the bottom, the loop plus the RF chokes will short out the source-to-ground resistor. Maybe there is not a need to raise the source voltage above DC ground potential anyway. Also, it may help to NOT bypass the sources to ground, to allow some negative feedback. That may help stabilize the amplifier. If other things occur to me, I will post them... Cheers, Tom |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 21, 2:56 am, K7ITM wrote:
On Mar 20, 12:58 pm, Artem wrote: :-) I saw the comment about "narrow-banding" the images. They were perhaps a little more than we needed, but it was nice to have something we could actually see. They did not take very long to download here, but someone with a slow connection may have troubles. I'm move images to ImageShack http://img524.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc9427ib7.jpg http://img262.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc9431tv9.jpg One comment: usually you do not need much voltage gain. It is enough to get power gain with the FETs. That is, the received signal voltage across the gap of the loop, as resonated by the capacitors, should be high enough to be used with a good receiver. The problem is that the impedance is very high there. But that same high impedance makes for easy oscillation. From what you posted, it sounds like maybe you have identified an oscillation. If the AGC voltage is low enough, does the oscillation stop? Yes. It's stop. my main reason for this antenna is make very narrow antenna for city. I can't receive to my receiver almost nothing by big nose from computers, lamps and other things. But looks like this antenna did not help. Its amplify narrow-band noise. And even add more noise when oscillated. The amplifier I built used two stages, an FET input stage and a buffer stage, and it had very low voltage gain--I am remembering about 3:1 or only 10dB, and maybe only 1:1 or 0dB including the output transformer, but quite a bit of power gain since it transformed the high loop impedance down to 50 ohms for the feedline. Also, there should be no need for the RF chokes from the gate-1 to source, if the loop is grounded at the bottom. Source is not grounded for DC. For better transistors matching and overcurrent protection. If the loop is grounded at the bottom, the loop plus the RF chokes will short out the source-to-ground resistor. Maybe there is not a need to raise the source voltage above DC ground potential anyway. Also, it may help to NOT bypass the sources to ground, to allow some negative feedback. That may help stabilize the amplifier. Sources is not grounded. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 21, 1:36 am, Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:58:02 -0700 (PDT), Artem wrote: Hi. I have some problem. I can't receive nothing except noise And self oscillation frequency. Try choking both what are labeled "RF Out" and "Shield Cable." Thank. It's good idea. I'll try. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 21, 3:08 am, Artem wrote:
On Mar 21, 2:56 am, K7ITM wrote: On Mar 20, 12:58 pm, Artem wrote: :-) I saw the comment about "narrow-banding" the images. They were perhaps a little more than we needed, but it was nice to have something we could actually see. They did not take very long to download here, but someone with a slow connection may have troubles. I'm move images to ImageShackhttp://img524.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc9427ib7.jpghttp://img262.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc9431tv9.jpg One comment: usually you do not need much voltage gain. It is enough to get power gain with the FETs. That is, the received signal voltage across the gap of the loop, as resonated by the capacitors, should be high enough to be used with a good receiver. The problem is that the impedance is very high there. But that same high impedance makes for easy oscillation. From what you posted, it sounds like maybe you have identified an oscillation. If the AGC voltage is low enough, does the oscillation stop? Yes. It's stop. my main reason for this antenna is make very narrow antenna for city. I can't receive to my receiver almost nothing by big nose from computers, lamps and other things. But looks like this antenna did not help. Its amplify narrow-band noise. And even add more noise when oscillated. The amplifier I built used two stages, an FET input stage and a buffer stage, and it had very low voltage gain--I am remembering about 3:1 or only 10dB, and maybe only 1:1 or 0dB including the output transformer, but quite a bit of power gain since it transformed the high loop impedance down to 50 ohms for the feedline. Also, there should be no need for the RF chokes from the gate-1 to source, if the loop is grounded at the bottom. Source is not grounded for DC. For better transistors matching and overcurrent protection. If the loop is grounded at the bottom, the loop plus the RF chokes will short out the source-to-ground resistor. Maybe there is not a need to raise the source voltage above DC ground potential anyway. Also, it may help to NOT bypass the sources to ground, to allow some negative feedback. That may help stabilize the amplifier. Sources is not grounded. Yes, unfortunately noise that is generated more than one or two wavelengths away from your antenna will be almost entirely electromagnetic by the time it reaches your antenna. Antennas do not differentiate between "electrically generated" and "magnetically generated" noise, when you are far enough that the electromagnetic field dominates over any near-field electric or magnetic field. The balanced small loop is good for rejecting electric-field noise only if (1) the noise is generated close to the antenna and (2) the antenna is close to the ground (so the electric field is guaranteed to be nearly vertical) -- -- where "close" means relative to a wavelength. So the small balanced loop is especially good for LF and VLF work. Perhaps someone else will have suggestions about what else you might try. Cheers, Tom |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 21, 6:26 pm, K7ITM wrote:
On Mar 21, 3:08 am, Artem wrote: Sources is not grounded. Yes, unfortunately noise that is generated more than one or two wavelengths away from your antenna will be almost entirely electromagnetic by the time it reaches your antenna. Antennas do not differentiate between "electrically generated" and "magnetically generated" noise, when you are far enough that the electromagnetic I did not hear nothing about electrically or magnetically photons. It's just photons. field dominates over any near-field electric or magnetic field. The balanced small loop is good for rejecting electric-field noise only if (1) the noise is generated close to the antenna and Yes. Computer, lamps etc close to antenna. (2) the antenna is close to the ground (so the electric field is guaranteed to be nearly 15 floor of 16-floor building. But I think that in this case "ground" are building walls. vertical) -- -- where "close" means relative to a wavelength. So the small balanced loop is especially good for LF and VLF work. my reason was make narrow-band antenna. For reject all out of band noise. Perhaps someone else will have suggestions about what else you might try. Cheers, Tom |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() my reason was make narrow-band antenna. For reject all out of band noise. That is a very worthwhile objective. All that noise adds to the intermod noise and the sooner you can stop it, the better. In my youth I recall calling CQ on 42 mhz for a couple of weeks. Fortunately, a very sharp yagi and very low power saved me from a violation. John Ferrell W8CCW Beware of the dopeler effect (pronounced dope-ler). That's where bad ideas seem good if they come at you fast enough. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
About a narrow filter at 10.7 MHz | Homebrew | |||
Narrow Band FM bandwidth and channel spacing | Equipment | |||
Flower Pot Antenna a Dual-Band (20m and 10m) 'portable' Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Narrow & Wide............ | Shortwave | |||
Antenna Specialists MON-4 VHF Low Band Scanner antenna - Can I trim it for 6 meter use ? | Antenna |