Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David G. Nagel wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: The point is that if an amp is equipped with foldback, it probably cannot vaporize a severely mismatched antenna without the aid of an antenna tuner. Actually it will most likely vaporize the tuner first... With #10 wire in the tuner coil and #26 wire in the hamstick coil? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lumpy wrote:
You have a tuner that vaporizes hamsticks? Assume a legal limit amp that folds back when mismatched. Add a legal limit tuner and indeed you can vaporize hamsticks. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil,
I think I'll take my tuner and go home. Not saying it wasn't fun, just other things to do, you know, that four letter word... 'X'ork. - 'Doc |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Lumpy wrote: You have a tuner that vaporizes hamsticks? Assume a legal limit amp that folds back when mismatched. Add a legal limit tuner and indeed you can vaporize hamsticks. Hmmm. Past experience suggests my Russian 5KW amp has no "foldback." I hesitate to think other experience the same--but, judging from some signals, it is quite likely! BUT! Very happy with the SDR! Regards, JS |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:33:16 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: A popular myth is developing that the tuner has no effect at the antenna feedpoint and the only goal is to make the transmitter "happy". My question is: if we monitored only the forward current or forward power at the antenna feedpoint, could we still adjust the tuner? If the answer is "yes", the myth is false. Would it help to attach an antenna analyzer to the back side of a tuner, tune the antenna and see if it affects the analyzer? -- 73 for now Buck, N4PGW www.lumpuckeroo.com "Small - broadband - efficient: pick any two." |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buck wrote:
Would it help to attach an antenna analyzer to the back side of a tuner, tune the antenna and see if it affects the analyzer? Certainly it changes the impedance looking into the tuner input and that has an effect on the entire antenna system. The forward and reflected voltages, currents, and powers are at their maximum values when the tuner achieves a Z0-match. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote: It's a short drive from there to "the tuner has no effect on the antenna". Actually, it went farther than that: From QRZ.com regarding tuners: "The tuner has absolutely no effect at the antenna." From eHam.net regarding tuners: "Does nothing. The tuner as the other poster said, just makes your radio happy." So we have a score or more posts that boil down to "at" or "on", when it is blatantly obvious what the intent of the statements were. ....good job! |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Higgins wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:33:16 -0500, Cecil Moore wrote: A popular myth is developing that the tuner has no effect at the antenna feedpoint and the only goal is to make the transmitter "happy". My question is: if we monitored only the forward current or forward power at the antenna feedpoint, could we still adjust the tuner? If the answer is "yes", the myth is false. I suspect many hams are confused on this subject and that many more just express themselves awkwardly. What's totally beyond my understanding is why so many here repeatedly waste their time helping you have fun with either category. Bravo! Endless self-indulgent mental masturbation appears to be the function of far too many posts over the last several years. This has virtually ruined what at one time was a fine resource for amateurs interested in antennas. I used to recommend that people who had questions about or interest in antennas come to this newsgroup. I stopped doing it, and now only take a look myself every week or two to see if anything has changed...it only seems to get worse. It's a damn shame what a few frequent posters have done to this newsgroup. |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"If we monitored only forward current or forward power at the antenna feedpoint, could we still adjust the tuner?" Yes because a conjugate match delivers all available power (a maximum) and a conjugate match also exists at every pair of terminals between the transmitter and the antenna if the tuner and line are essentially lossless. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil, W5DXP wrote: "If we monitored only forward current or forward power at the antenna feedpoint, could we still adjust the tuner?" Yes because a conjugate match delivers all available power (a maximum) and a conjugate match also exists at every pair of terminals between the transmitter and the antenna if the tuner and line are essentially lossless. I made an interesting assertion on a related thread over on QRZ Q&A. "A CONJUGATE MATCH TO A MISMATCHED LOAD GUARANTEES MAXIMUM POWER REFLECTED FROM THE LOAD!" The maximum available power is delivered to a mismatched load when a conjugate match exists. It follows that is also the point where the incident power is maximum and the mismatched load will be reflecting the maximum amount of incident power. Apparently, one could adjust an antenna tuner for a conjugate match by monitoring the reflected power at the *output* of the tuner and adjusting for a maximum. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Effect of raising vertical antenna higher | Antenna | |||
effect of metal pipe supporting a vertical cage antenna | Antenna | |||
FA: MFJ-949E DELUXE VERSA TUNER II - Ham Radio Antenna Tuner | Antenna | |||
FA: MFJ-949E DELUXE VERSA TUNER II - Ham Radio Antenna Tuner | Equipment | |||
FA: MFJ 949E Deluxe Versa Tuner II Dual Meter Antenna Tuner | Boatanchors |