Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Situation:
I bought a cottage last fall, about 50 minutes drive north of Ottawa, Canada. The cottage came with a disused VHF-only antenna on an approximately 20 foot tower, with about 10 feet of pole including a rotator. With some noodling with the console and trimming of trees, I was able to get the rotator working and basic VHF reception. So the goal now is to get UHF reception as well, perhaps improving my VHF reception along the way if possible. The physical situation is difficult. The terrain is very mountainous, and the cottage is nestled on a steep hill about 300ft tall that blocks the main direction towards all transmitters in the city. The other side of the lake is also a steep mountain, so multipath is very prevalent. As well, tall trees all around the property dwarf the tower. So... not an ideal situation, but my expectations are reasonable. It would just be nice to get enough channels to pass a rainy day, and a lot of the better channels are starting to be on UHF around here. (all analog) The current antenna is shown he http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/antenna_...on_image_1.jpg ...I don't quite recognize the type, it's not the standard log-periodic style of TV antenna seen on most towers. Since it is VHF-only in an area with a dozen or so UHF stations, I assume it's an older installation. It is relatively large (certainly longer than 10 feet). First question, is this older antenna design acceptable, and would it's VHF performance compare decently with a more conventional design of the same size? If it's fine, I prefer to just leave it there, but if it's an outdated or inferior design, there might be room for easy improvement right there. It is only VHF, so I do need a UHF antenna in some shape or form. I have acquired this serviceable and more typically-styled UHF/VHF antenna, of about the same size: http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/antenna_...on_image_2.jpg Would the VHF performance of this "modern" style of antenna be any improvement on the existing one? If it would I might consider installing it, but that is obviously a bit of a job to switch considering the tower. Another option that might work... the nose of the new antenna unbolts and seems to me to be a typical UHF design (with two VHF tines that I suspect wouldn't affect UHF): http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/antenna_...on_image_3.jpg Am I correct in assuming that this can be used alone as a UHF antenna? ...if the existing VHF antenna is "about as good as I can expect", I might choose to just install this as a UHF antenna with a separate 300 ohm lead down, as the TV I use has a separate UHF input anyways so it would be simpler than combing and splitting anyways... not sure if I can get enough separation to put it on the same pole though... Any ideas or suggestions? Experiences? Cheers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Extra Class License Study Material | Antenna | |||
ON4SKY needs images of your lightning protection | Antenna | |||
BEWARE SPENDING TIME ANSWERING QUESTIONS HERE (WAS Electronic Questions) | Antenna |