Richard Clark wrote:

...
73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Well, come to think of it, that won't do now, will it?

I mean your education in biology is probably just as lacking as in all
the other sciences you have demonstrated here ...

This:

"Human blood plasma has an osmotic pressure of about 290 mOsm and water
from the open ocean has an osmotic pressure of about 1010 mOsm. This
indicates that there is much more salt in sea water than in human blood
plasma and also that there is less pure water in a liter of sea water
than in a liter of plasma. Just as ions diffuse from areas of high
concentration in a solution to areas of low concentration, so do water
molecules diffuse from areas of high water concentration (= low osmotic
pressure) to areas of low water concentration (= high osmotic pressure).
In considering this it is well to remember that salt added to water
lowers the water concentration of the resulting solution. When water
diffuses through membranes such as those around cells (called
semipermeable membranes because they are nearly impermeable to ions but
very permeable to water), this diffusion of water is called osmosis.
Osmosis is the reason that the skin on our hands wrinkles into "prune
fingers" when we stay too long in the bath or shower. Water diffuses
from the higher water concentration (but low salt concentration) of the
fresh water in the bath into the lower water concentration (but higher
salt concentration) of our skin, causing it to swell and be thrown into
wrinkles. The exact opposite happens when we immerse ourselves in sea
water at the beach and our skin, particularly on our hands and faces,
shrinks by osmosis and feels tight."

From he

http://ww2.lafayette.edu/~hollidac/osmoticprimer.html

Feel free to investigate other sites, perhaps harvard.edu?

Regards,
JS

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:04:46 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

Well, come to think of it, that won't do now, will it?

No one would think so from you Brett,

But a shallow clip and paste education has served your product here
for years as a substitute to understanding certainly. Simple point of
your posting to a forum of licensed radio operators where you can't
even pass a minimal FCC test serves to illustrate this. Your
pretending to be anonymous pollutes any sense of authentic thought
even more.

Insofar as spamming articles here to elevate your sham status: if
posting three times to a single offering (a signature if ever,
especially when you respond to yourself twice too) were to crown you
king of the xerox over Cecil, you would still have 10,000 postings to
go to eclipse his commentaries - shouldn't take you more than an
afternoon to reach that exalted height.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:04:46 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

Well, come to think of it, that won't do now, will it?

No one would think so from you Brett,

But a shallow clip and paste education has served your product here
for years as a substitute to understanding certainly. Simple point of
your posting to a forum of licensed radio operators where you can't
even pass a minimal FCC test serves to illustrate this. Your
pretending to be anonymous pollutes any sense of authentic thought
even more.

Insofar as spamming articles here to elevate your sham status: if
posting three times to a single offering (a signature if ever,
especially when you respond to yourself twice too) were to crown you
king of the xerox over Cecil, you would still have 10,000 postings to
go to eclipse his commentaries - shouldn't take you more than an
afternoon to reach that exalted height.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard:

Your capabilities are quite obvious to those with serious gray matter
.... your tactics remind me of gorilla warfare and behaviors I have seen
demonstrated in high school :-( ... your ramblings into shakespeare
suggest your education is more suited to the liberal arts (there is
nothing wrong with that, mind you!)

You made a grave mistake in all the educational institutions you may
have attended ... you thought who taught the material mattered--it did
not, only the material mattered--how/where to find it, etc. This has
shattered your credibility and taken you far off course from logic ...
you are stuck with attacking the messenger and NOT the message.

If you ever wish to change the fact you are easily ignored and made the
butt of jokes ... look to the above ...

Regards,
JS

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:09:30 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

you thought who taught the material mattered
Imagine if Brett were to sign his own name to a post and had to
indulge the sophist fantasies of a "John Smith" in pointless reply. Is
it your fear that it would be a tough slog to hold your own as either
the plebe or the troll in that dim mirrored contest of wit?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:09:30 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

you thought who taught the material mattered
Imagine if Brett were to sign his own name to a post and had to
indulge the sophist fantasies of a "John Smith" in pointless reply. Is
it your fear that it would be a tough slog to hold your own as either
the plebe or the troll in that dim mirrored contest of wit?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

LOL ...

"Dim Mirrored" is better than "dim-witted!" The shoe box your mind lays
in is much too small ... however, I doubt you can ever raise up far
enough to peek over the edge ... sorry story really ... :-(

Now, go bother other dim-wits ...

Regards,
JS

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:53:58 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

"Dim Mirrored" is better than "dim-witted!"

Sure, but which one is it? John or Brett? Who gets nicked when you
shave using this mirror? Brett seems bloodless, and JS is a ghost.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:

...
Sure, but which one is it? John or Brett? Who gets nicked when you
shave using this mirror? Brett seems bloodless, and JS is a ghost.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hey, what comes around, goes around ...

Since all your responses to any of my posts have/has been
non-nonsensical, moronic, stupid, ignorant, without substance, vicious,
vindictive, etc., all I can do is repay the favor(s.)

Look for as much worth in my responses to your posts as I have found in
yours ... what? You expected different? LOL!

Good luck, may the others be stupid enough to remain your pawns ...

Regards,
JS

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:29:00 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

all I can do is repay the favor(s.)

Rather bloodless and ghost-like imitation(z) really.

Good luck, may the others be stupid enough to remain your pawns ...
You misspelled prawns again.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:29:00 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

all I can do is repay the favor(s.)

Rather bloodless and ghost-like imitation(z) really.

Good luck, may the others be stupid enough to remain your pawns ...
You misspelled prawns again.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Check my spelling on "idiot", IDIOT!

Regards,
JS

Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:29:00 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

all I can do is repay the favor(s.)

Rather bloodless and ghost-like imitation(z) really.

Good luck, may the others be stupid enough to remain your pawns ...
You misspelled prawns again.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Look, if you keep this up, I am going to find out what nut house they
have you stuck in, and you are hiding in, in Washington state. I then
am going to make a complaint and have them cut your computer privileges,
think about that ... you won't like it. 8-)

They might even take away your comic books and ice cream at bed time!
ROFLOL!

Regards,
JS