I want to share with you one problem that I have on the above subject
When placing a yagi in free space the computor programs supply a gain
figure
where according to my thinking the root cause for ejection is the
intersection of two magnetic field.How this happens with a yagi is a
matter of conjecture. Any pointers?
Performing the same with an arrangement in equilibhrium there is no
gravity and yet gain is shown. This leads to four posabilities
! in the absence of levitation ejection is provided by the sliding of
the charges at the radiator ends as with corona in a vacuum. Problem
no spin applied
2 With a coupled antenna, yagi there exists two magnetic fields that
intersect where the charges again because of the absence of
equilibrium the charge again slides off the end Problem again no spin
applied
3 The programs have been modified from inception where the only rules
involved were Maxwell's laws which was then modified to correllate
with pre conceived known facts
4 The concept of initial reliance on equilibrium as preached by the
masters is incorrect and my reasoning is in error
I do not know the answer as I am not skilled with respect to the
algerythms used but the unknown can supply ammunition for loose mouths
until it is resolved
One thing is certain, Gauss states that static particles cannot
radiate in free space as there is no exchange of flux
and Maxwell includes the vector associated with the weak force where
gravity is non existent or zero !.
Best regards
Art

Art Unwin wrote:

One thing is certain, Gauss states that static particles cannot
radiate in free space as there is no exchange of flux
and Maxwell includes the vector associated with the weak force where
gravity is non existent or zero !.
Best regards
Art

You've just unvailed the dirty secret that antennas don't work in
space and that all the so called communications with Appolo, Pioneer,
Mir, ISS, the shuttle and all telecommunications satellites is faked.

Now you had better be on the watch for the black helicopters for reveling
this.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote:

...
You've just unvailed the dirty secret that antennas don't work in
space and that all the so called communications with Appolo, Pioneer,
Mir, ISS, the shuttle and all telecommunications satellites is faked.

Now you had better be on the watch for the black helicopters for reveling
this.

No. But the new pictures of light-waves do suggest they travel a medium
which exists, EVEN, in space, and yet, unseen to-date, and end up
"striking" the antenna(s) in question ... but then, most have always
accepted waves need a "medium" to propagate on/in ... but then--assign
it the name "either" and grown men cower in the shadows, in fear! ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:10:28 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin
wrote:

I want to share with you one problem that I have on the above subject
When placing a yagi in free space the computor programs supply a gain
figure
where according to my thinking the root cause for ejection is the
intersection of two magnetic field (...)

Not bad, but still a pile of garbage. Your word salad reminds me of
papers submitted by student who didn't have a clue what they were
doing and simply threw every buzzword they could remember into the
report.

Did you use an online technobabble generator, rant-o-matic, or created
it by hand? If online, I would be interesting in the URL as I have a
business plan to re-write.

Incidentally, if you're trying to regain your equalibrium, I suggest
that lay off the booze. Also, if your antenna is performing
self-ejections, you might want to tighten the mounting clamps.



--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

On Sep 14, 9:45*pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
One thing is certain, Gauss states that static particles cannot
radiate in free space as there is no exchange of flux
and Maxwell includes the vector associated with the weak force where
gravity is non existent or zero !.
Best regards
Art

You've just unvailed the dirty secret that antennas don't work in
space and that all the so called communications with Appolo, Pioneer,
Mir, ISS, the shuttle and all telecommunications satellites is faked.

Now you had better be on the watch for the black helicopters for reveling
this.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

No I have not invalidated the concept of radiation in space since I
cannot rule out the root cause of the phenomia of
two insecting magnetic fields At the same time I have little belief in
the total veracity of antenna programs because of assumptions made on
preparation
I also suspect that the expansion to rediation in free space was
concluded without due consideration as the programs depict the only
change as zero reflection with the absence of earth with out
consideration to other factors. I am not denying radiation in out
space cannot exist only that I do not know how it is created without
influence from outside or added forces. At the same time there are
more indications of correctness in my analysis via well known
phenomina than the puzzle that I have present. I rely only on the
logic presented by other people which I have no reason to discredit
most of which have stood the test of time. The computer programs were
based on the laws of Maxwell so assumptions should not have been
necessary nor the revisions made over the years One assumption is
clearly in error is based on sino soidal current flow where a full
wave radiator is considered to be a tank circuit
where energy is moved via pulses, obviously I am missing something
here as well as the mathematical constant of subtraction for free
space.
There is a problem but the root cause is obviously unknown thus my
theorem should not be discounted Formulas formed by Einstein on
relativity have included the same laws of Maxwell who includes the
weak force which is nothing but a vector at the present time such that
all forces equal zero. The latter was chosen as a fact thus there was
no option to conclude that the gap created via vectors was a
unidentifiable force often stated as an anti gravitational force thus
without gravity all forces must change to conform to equilibrium,
something I cannot accept per Gauss.
Jim, I am just being honest about my findings and at the same time
pointing to areas of disagreement by the unknowns that are presented.
Only the test of time is of value as more knoweledge is accumulated
Regards
Art

On Sep 14, 11:26*pm, John Smith wrote:

No. *But the new pictures of light-waves do suggest they travel a medium
which exists, EVEN, in space, and yet, unseen to-date, and end up
"striking" the antenna(s) in question ... but then, most have always
accepted waves need a "medium" to propagate on/in ... but then--assign
it the name "either" and grown men cower in the shadows, in fear! *ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

Egad, another senility eruption.

On Sep 14, 10:26*pm, John Smith wrote:
wrote:
...
You've just unvailed the dirty secret that antennas don't work in
space and that all the so called communications with Appolo, Pioneer,
Mir, ISS, the shuttle and all telecommunications satellites is faked.

Now you had better be on the watch for the black helicopters for reveling
this.

No. *But the new pictures of light-waves do suggest they travel a medium
which exists, EVEN, in space, and yet, unseen to-date, and end up
"striking" the antenna(s) in question ... but then, most have always
accepted waves need a "medium" to propagate on/in ... but then--assign
it the name "either" and grown men cower in the shadows, in fear! *ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

John the problem as I see it is how the magnetic field is bestowed on
a unbound particle
that is not rejected by the Earth"s magnetic field but allowed to
ecape from the Sun's magnetic field
.. It is this I have no explanation for
and despite all reference to garbage nobody can supply the true
creation of radiation.
More light needs to be shed on the subject of space. to determine what
one calls garbage
because of a compressed field of knoweledge where another without
those constraints see it as a treasure.
I have a strong suspicion that scientists have assigned diiferent
names based on the theory assigned to one
many of which there is no evidence of their existance
Best regards
Art

John Smith wrote:
But the new pictures of light-waves do suggest they travel a medium
which exists, ...

One of my books on the subject calls it the "quantum soup".
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

wrote:
Egad, another senility eruption.

Quoting "Alpha and Omega", by Charles Seife:

"Empty space is an incredibly complex substance,
.... Quantum physicists are forced to conclude
that the vacuum isn't truly empty. It is seething
with particles and energy."

"Casimir effect: The ability of the ZERO-POINT
ENERGY, the particles constantly winking in and
out of existence, to exert a force. Predicted
by Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir, the Casimir
effect has been measured."

Reckon all quantum physicists are senile?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Art Unwin wrote:

...
John the problem as I see it is how the magnetic field is bestowed on
a unbound particle
that is not rejected by the Earth"s magnetic field but allowed to
ecape from the Sun's magnetic field
. It is this I have no explanation for
and despite all reference to garbage nobody can supply the true
creation of radiation.
More light needs to be shed on the subject of space. to determine what
one calls garbage
because of a compressed field of knoweledge where another without
those constraints see it as a treasure.
I have a strong suspicion that scientists have assigned diiferent
names based on the theory assigned to one
many of which there is no evidence of their existance
Best regards
Art

There is actually a LOT in the few words above, it is deceptively
stated--although, perhaps, without intention; had to really think about
it a bit:

I quite agree with the fact that what you refer to as "have assigned
different names [to] ..." is/are at the center of what you speak, what
the "either is" and what the Hadron project is about to attempt to look
at, in greater detail ... indeed, it is where the "new
knowledge/discoveries" are about to emerge from (if there is any chance
that will happen--at all.)

Hopefully, this all will end up pointing at new ways to design antennas
to take advantage of "its'" (the eithers') properties. And, is an area
adjacent to, in the very least, the one you are in the process of
contemplating/imagining ...

The earths magnetic field (indeed, any static/changing magnetic field
for that matter), gravity, suns particles/emissions/etc. all depend on
the "either" you place in question; when you sprinkle iron filings on a
sheet of paper and position a magnet below--this is what you look at; I
believe it is also what is referred to as "the weak force" (or, is
intrinsically related), but talk about a misnomer!

We just spin our wheels with little progress ahead ... but then Einstein
even referred to it as, and I paraphrase, "un-comprehend-able!"

But then, perhaps some of "these things" are just shooting bullets
(particles) as some picture the "particles." One must acknowledge this,
although I have come NOT to "believe it", at this point.

We can't know until we really "know", and even then we may have yet to
"prove" it; and, therein lies the real problem(s). For now, we must
face the goons who poke fun at men and women who wonder, and dream, yet
are certain "they" know SOMETHING EXISTS THERE.

You are correct to focus your vision(s) towards the Hadron project ...
it is at least one hope of vindication! :-(

And, even if you still do not see the either as I do -- you will "come
'round!" grin

Regards,
JS