Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
John Smith wrote: Ever heard of amplifed rabbit ears? I bought one, a Phillips MANT310/MNT310F - didn't work as well as the non-amplified RS one I already had. Actually, I had to construct my own with a broadband MMIC device, to get decent functionality ... however, my mother has an el-cheapo unit she purchased from some yard sale, it/they work surprisingly well! Location, reflections, etc. can vary ones experience greatly--but hey, they usually beat a wire coat hanger! :-) Regards, JS |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Nov, 22:45, Rich Grise wrote:
My current UHF antenna is a 14" Radio Shack clip lead clipped from the center of my coax to the venetian blind. I have to hand-adjust it for the channel, weather conditions, phase of the moon, etc. I can do this because I can _see_ an indication of signal strength. Well, with this new Fascist "No More Free TV" crap, I'm gonna need a real UHF antenna. My budget is exceedingly limited, but I have a supply of materials (GTAW filler rod, with some coppery-colored coating, so it solders like a dream, and is as stiff as piano wire) to build an antenna with. But I've been searching the web for some weeks now, and I can't seem to find any kind of formula, except there was this program I downloaded - LPDA.EXE, which runs on DOS. Unfortunately, it's in Russian or Polish or Uzbekistani - one of those East Yurp languages. Here's a screen snap:http://mysite.verizon.net/richgrise/...rog-Output.gif Which I went through pretty much by-guess-and-by-gosh - can anybody read that stuff? There are a lot of factors I don't know about, like "Tau", and all of the specific designs on the web are flat - something is telling me I want one of those pyramid-shaped ones, but I really don't know the difference (between that and flat) - it's probably something to do with bandwidth or F/B ratio or whatever. My local library has no ARRL Antenna Book (!), and did I mention I have a seriously limited budget? So, how do I pursue this? It'd be nice to have a program that will calculate the whole thing for me, but am I dreaming? If I want to send myself to Log-Periodic School, where should I start? Or, does anyone have a UHF-TV log-periodic design that they'd share? :-) Thanks, Rich I have used the procedure in the following paper: http://www.urel.feec.vutbr.cz/ra2008...tracts/116.pdf I slightly modified the design (e.g. I used several different diameters for the elements), but basically I used the same formulae. I did not use their formula for deciding the right spacing between the support tubes to get the right characteristic impedance, because I suspect that maybe it is only valid over a limited range of spacing. Instead, I measured the characteristic impedance of just the tubes with no elements attached on a VNA that could plot impedance vs distance in a sort of TDR mode, and I adjusted the spacing until it was right. I epoxied some very small (roughly 1mm cube) spacers between the support tubes to keep the distance right, once it was adjusted properly. It is important that the space between the support tubes is mostly filled with air, not epoxy or any other dielectric, because the wave needs to propagate at the right speed between the tubes so that the elements are fed in the right relative phase, and this won't happen if there is something with a higher dielectric constant in there. I used those brass tubes that you can get in hobby shops, but unfortunately brass is fairly resistive and I did not silver plate it. I would have used aluminium if it were easier to solder in a reliable way. The finished antenna had a good return loss over the desired frequency range (sorry, can't remember the numbers) and it did the job for which it was intended although I don't have a measured gain value etc. because I don't have an antenna range. I have a spreadsheet for calculating the element lengths (in Openoffice.org format) if you are interested. Chris |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:49:03 -0800, Jim Lux wrote:
Rich Grise wrote: .... myself to Log-Periodic School, where should I start? Looking for a cookbook design, or the theory to do it yourself? Cookbook, if at all possible. Like, element lengths and spacing, and the angle between the booms - which brings up a question - what effect does it have when you take a flat L-P and "open it up", like to a pyramid shape - I was doing a thought experiment with this and when it's completely "flattened out", (180 degrees between the booms), it looks like a drum roll please Bow Tie! Thanks, Rich |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:53:33 +0100, TheM wrote:
"Rich Grise" wrote in message news ![]() My current UHF antenna is a 14" Radio Shack clip lead clipped from the .... myself to Log-Periodic School, where should I start? Or, does anyone have a UHF-TV log-periodic design that they'd share? :-) Upisi najnizju radnu frekvenciju : enter lowest frequency Upisi najvisju radnu frekvenciju : enter highest frequency Duzina antene: length of antena Broj elemenata: number of elements Pritisni taster za proracun antene: press a key to calculate antenna Duzina 1. elem. length of first element Pritisni taster za nastavak Press any key to continue Duzina zavrsnog kratkospojenog odsecka: length of final shorted section Upisi precnik dipola: enter diameter of the dipole Upisi ulaznu otpornost (ohm): Entry resistance (weird in original) Impedanca napojnog voda: feeder impedance (not sure what this is) Upisi precnik napojnih provodnika: diameter of feeding leeds (my guess these are two bars that hold elements) razmak izmedju napojnih provodnika: distance between feeder leeds (and distance between two bard holding elements) You owe me a beer. BTW, its Croatian or Serbian. I kind of understand some 90%. Thanks! Rich |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:31:05 -0800, John Smith wrote:
Rich Grise wrote: My current UHF antenna is a 14" Radio Shack clip lead clipped from the center of my coax to the venetian blind. I have to hand-adjust it for the channel, weather conditions, phase of the moon, etc. I can do this because I can _see_ an indication of signal strength. LOL ... talk about trolls! That HAS TO BE THE BEST TROLL OPENING LINE I HAVE EVER SEEN! Hey, "John Smith", why don't you go outside and play hide-and-go-****-yourself? Cheers! Rich |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:53:28 -0800, Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:45:19 GMT, Rich Grise wrote: But I've been searching the web for some weeks now, and I can't seem to find any kind of formula, except there was this program I downloaded - LPDA.EXE, which runs on DOS. Unfortunately, it's in Russian or Polish or Uzbekistani - one of those East Yurp languages. Here's a screen snap: http://mysite.verizon.net/richgrise/...rog-Output.gif Which I went through pretty much by-guess-and-by-gosh - can anybody read that stuff? Someone else has already provided the translation, so that will take care of some of the wholes in data entry and reading. There are a lot of factors I don't know about, like "Tau", and all of the specific designs on the web are flat - something is telling me I want one of those pyramid-shaped ones, but I really don't know the difference (between that and flat) - it's probably something to do with bandwidth or F/B ratio or whatever. Tau is related to the shape of what you call the pyramid, or more actually to the angle of the taper. This defines the smoothness of matching across the span of frequencies you entered into the program. As you can see, it also relates to the available gain. Another correlative is it also relates to its length. All of these things are trade-offs that lend to the rule of choosing what you want most and giving up on the rest. I note elsewhere that you wanted something about 1 foot long. There is a Tau that will give you this boom length, and you got it on the first guess. So, how do I pursue this? It'd be nice to have a program that will calculate the whole thing for me, but am I dreaming? If I want to send myself to Log-Periodic School, where should I start? You should start building what your screen shot gave you IF that is the span of frequency you need (already questioned by other correspondents). 73's "Best Regardses"? ;-) Anyway, thanks for this - I'm feeling a lot better about this project now thanks to your help and that guy that translated it for me (forgot the name, but he knows who he is - Thanks Again!); I might even start cutting wire[1] and soldering this weekend! ;-) Thanks! Rich [1] GTAW (Gas Tungsten Arc Welding) filler rod, with some coppery- colored coating that solders even better than copper, about .030 dia., and as stiff as piano wire. |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:53:28 -0800, Richard Clark wrote:
You should start building what your screen shot gave you IF that is the span of frequency you need (already questioned by other correspondents). Apparently I'll only need up to ch. 52; have to look up the carrier freq. on that. Ch. 14 = 470-476 MHz Ch. 83 = 884-890 MHz I think. Now all I need to do is the algebra. ;-) 52 - 14 = 38 38 * 6 = 228 228 + 470 = 698 698 + 6 = 704 Cheers! Rich |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:50:57 +0000, Dave wrote:
Log periodics are not necessary for sub-octave operation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWQhlmJTMzw Dude! Awesome! And this one doesn't even have a reflector!. I wonder how far I should hang it in front of the venetian blind. ;-) Thanks! Rich |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Rich Grise wrote: My current UHF antenna is a 14" Radio Shack clip lead clipped from the center of my coax to the venetian blind. I have to hand-adjust it for the channel, weather conditions, phase of the moon, etc. I can do this because I can _see_ an indication of signal strength. Your clip lead is too long. Try 1/4 wave. I got good reception using a 4 1/2 inch length of 24 gauge solid poked into the F connector for a (line of sight) 45 kW station, 20 miles away. (Most of the local stations run in the 500-1000 kW range). Mark Zenier Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com) |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:18:47 +0000, GregS wrote:
Ever hear of the BOW TIE. Its a sort of Fractal antenna. Having a wide band. It could be improved by making it a full fractal. Yes - somebody just pointed to a youtube of somebody making one out of coathangers. I think I'm gonna do that. Cheers! Rich |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Log periodic antenna design | Antenna | |||
radiation pattern of log-periodic antenna | Antenna | |||
FA log periodic outdoor scanner antenna | Scanner | |||
FS WiNRADiO AX-31B Planar Log-Periodic Antenna | Swap | |||
FA: WiNRADiO AX-31B Planar Log-Periodic Antenna | Scanner |