When Maxwell added the displacement addition it was
to place radiation in a system of equilibrium as the formulas did not
prior to the addition meet Newtons law of equilibrium.,
The addition of Maxwell to Amperes law in reality because of the
required units, was seen to be a force or vector that displaced
something
of which they did not know. It was later interpretation that the
displacement referred to the Aether
and from then speculation built up. Einstein saw this addition as a
very weak force and spent his life looking for the
characteristics and action of this force but failed and instead turned
to to relatavistic observations which led to
various important developments. In actuality this displacement vector
was Newtons reaction vector to the applied current which was later
confirmed by the discovery by Foucault and termed eddy current. It was
this applied current and its reaction force that applied a elevation
or anti gravity force and at the same time applied a spin component to
the residing particles on the surface of the radiator. So scientists
were correct in assuming that the weak force was a derivative of the
magnetic force but made an error in referring to this force providing
a
projective wave into the aether. Tho this theory of action has now
lost favor with the scientific community the idea
that light was a function of a wave took place and survived. With the
explanation that displacement current is the eddy current which
provides elevation together with a twisting action of the particle so
a straight line projection is enabled it thus destroys the notion of
light being a series of waves to being a series of particles in motion
with a
revolving movement. The basis of the above was determined initially by
changing Gaussian law of statics to a dynamic field by the addition of
radiators to the static particles while maintaining a state of
equilibrium such that it met the essence of Maxwells law's which then
led to a true desciption of the action of the displacement force
applied to particles plus providing further evidence for the Grand
Uniform Theory
Food for thought
Art Unwin......KB9MZ.......(xg)

On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:04:24 -0800 (PST), Art Unwin
wrote:

changing Gaussian law of statics to a dynamic field by the addition of
radiators to the static particles while maintaining a state of
equilibrium such that it met the essence of Maxwells law's which then
led to a true desciption of the action of the displacement force
applied to particles

Then what happens?

plus providing further evidence for the Grand
Uniform Theory

There is no such thing.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Nov 24, 11:31*am, Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:04:24 -0800 (PST), Art Unwin

wrote:
changing Gaussian law of statics to a dynamic field by the addition of
radiators to the static particles while maintaining a state of
equilibrium such that it met the essence of Maxwells law's which then
led to a true desciption of the action of the displacement force
applied to particles

Then what happens?

plus providing further evidence for the Grand
Uniform Theory

There is no such thing.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

No more Richard, all done
You will never understand what is a given for engineers
Suggest you get a job on the top of a islamic tower
where you can holler several times a day.

On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:04:24 -0800 (PST), Art Unwin
wrote:

changing Gaussian law of statics to a dynamic field by the addition of
radiators to the static particles while maintaining a state of
equilibrium such that it met the essence of Maxwells law's which then
led to a true desciption of the action of the displacement force
applied to particles

Then what happens?

plus providing further evidence for the Grand
Uniform Theory

There is no such thing.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC