Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm using a line of site software to find an optimum tower height for my
location to receive UHF broadcasts centered around 600MHz. This software has an atmospheric correction factor for the frequency you are trying to receive. They give a value of 1.333 for microwave, but don't give an exact frequency. Does anyone know how to find this factor for a specific frequency? The range for this factor is 0.1 - 5. 0.1 would correspond to a high frequency (microwave (light maybe)), and 5 would be a low frequency (vlf?). |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Doe wrote:
"They gave a value of 1.333 for microwave, but don`t give an actual frequency." It`s true that there is a slight difference in the distances to the optical and radio horizons. It`s not important because the effective distance is inexact and varies with changes in atmospheric conditions. For radio horizon, the geometric model is usually an earth 4/3 tha actual. That`s where the 1.333 comes from. It would mean the earth appears under normal conditions to be a little flatter than it is. Radio range is increased a little over estimates based on a true geometric model. Since a still atmosphere can cause layering of air temperatures, refraction occurs sometimes in the early morning which bends radio waves away from the earth. To account for these misfortunes, designers of sensitive radio services sometimes use an earth model which is only 2/3 the size of the actual earth so contact is kept under lousy line-of-sight conditions. Using the customary 4/3 smooth earth estimate, an easily remembered formula emerges: D = sq.rt. 2H D is the distance to the horizon in miles. H is the height of the antenna in feet. You have an antenna at 200 feet. The sq rt of 400 is 20 miles. 20 miles is the distance over a bare landscape that you can communicate with an antenna at about ground level. If both antennas were at 200 feet, you might be able to communicate 40 miles at line-of-sight frequencies. The estimate is usually very good. Best regards, Richard Harrison,KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|