Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I put up a 133 ft Windom at 40 feet to operate some CW on the lower
bands during the down cycle. It seems, on 40 Mtrs, I am getting great reports to the north, MI and Canada, but lower reports to the south. This thing can't have a front to back, can it? Can anyone point me to some radiations patterns for the Windom? Thanks. Win w0lz |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
yes, it can. it could also be that the ground is better one way than the
other, there is a building the wrong (or right) distance away one way or the other, that there is a hill in the way one way, that you have been on when propagation favors one direction over the other, or that you have just contacted people who have better receivers to your north than to your south. random on the air tests of antennas are poor at best, misleading at worst, and are generally not all that useful in figuring out what the antenna itself is doing. "Winston" wrote in message ... I put up a 133 ft Windom at 40 feet to operate some CW on the lower bands during the down cycle. It seems, on 40 Mtrs, I am getting great reports to the north, MI and Canada, but lower reports to the south. This thing can't have a front to back, can it? Can anyone point me to some radiations patterns for the Windom? Thanks. Win w0lz |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:51:44 -0000, "Dave" wrote:
You may be right, Dave. I live on a lake and am radiating over water to the north. I also have a little natural screening to the south. Win w0lz yes, it can. it could also be that the ground is better one way than the other, there is a building the wrong (or right) distance away one way or the other, that there is a hill in the way one way, that you have been on when propagation favors one direction over the other, or that you have just contacted people who have better receivers to your north than to your south. random on the air tests of antennas are poor at best, misleading at worst, and are generally not all that useful in figuring out what the antenna itself is doing. "Winston" wrote in message .. . I put up a 133 ft Windom at 40 feet to operate some CW on the lower bands during the down cycle. It seems, on 40 Mtrs, I am getting great reports to the north, MI and Canada, but lower reports to the south. This thing can't have a front to back, can it? Can anyone point me to some radiations patterns for the Windom? Thanks. Win w0lz |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Winston wrote:
I put up a 133 ft Windom at 40 feet to operate some CW on the lower bands during the down cycle. It seems, on 40 Mtrs, I am getting great reports to the north, MI and Canada, but lower reports to the south. This thing can't have a front to back, can it? Can anyone point me to some radiations patterns for the Windom? An off-center-fed dipole favors the hemisphere toward the long end. If the long part of the dipole is pointing North, you will get the best results in NE and NW directions. TOA on 40m is about 45 deg. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil, I failed to say that it is a Carolina Windom. Would the
vertical radial alter the pattern significantly. The antenna runs East and West with the long arm to the West. Thnaks, Win w0lz On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:49:35 -0600, Cecil Moore wrote: Winston wrote: I put up a 133 ft Windom at 40 feet to operate some CW on the lower bands during the down cycle. It seems, on 40 Mtrs, I am getting great reports to the north, MI and Canada, but lower reports to the south. This thing can't have a front to back, can it? Can anyone point me to some radiations patterns for the Windom? An off-center-fed dipole favors the hemisphere toward the long end. If the long part of the dipole is pointing North, you will get the best results in NE and NW directions. TOA on 40m is about 45 deg. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Winston wrote:
Cecil, I failed to say that it is a Carolina Windom. Would the vertical radial alter the pattern significantly. The antenna runs East and West with the long arm to the West. Yes, that *does* change things. The Carolina Windom is somewhat like the original windom, i.e. the vertical feedline is designed to carry common mode currents and therefore radiate. This antenna could probably be modeled as an off-center-fed dipole with an extra conductor hanging down but I don't know which side the coax braid is connected to. Do you know? Is the coax braid connected to the long side or the short side? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I cant tell, Cecil. The vertical feedline connects via a PL connector
into a balum. I'm not sure it is a balum. It just looks like a balum. There is what looks like a second balum at the bottom of the feed line, PL connectors at both ends, and then 70 feet of RG-8. Maybe the first balum is a 4 to1 and the second a 1 to 1.Bought it from Radio World. Actually I am very pleased with it. I just wondered why most of my contacts are in the same area, to the North. Win w0lz On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:23:33 -0600, Cecil Moore wrote: Winston wrote: Cecil, I failed to say that it is a Carolina Windom. Would the vertical radial alter the pattern significantly. The antenna runs East and West with the long arm to the West. Yes, that *does* change things. The Carolina Windom is somewhat like the original windom, i.e. the vertical feedline is designed to carry common mode currents and therefore radiate. This antenna could probably be modeled as an off-center-fed dipole with an extra conductor hanging down but I don't know which side the coax braid is connected to. Do you know? Is the coax braid connected to the long side or the short side? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Winston wrote:
I cant tell, Cecil. The vertical feedline connects via a PL connector into a balum. I'm not sure it is a balum. It just looks like a balum. There is what looks like a second balum at the bottom of the feed line, PL connectors at both ends, and then 70 feet of RG-8. Maybe the first balum is a 4 to1 and the second a 1 to 1.Bought it from Radio World. Actually I am very pleased with it. I just wondered why most of my contacts are in the same area, to the North. Could be the top device is a 4:1 voltage balun which doesn't balance the currents and that's why the vertical feedline radiates. The bottom device is probably a 1:1 choke. The slope of the land at my QTH favors Westward radiation. Perhaps that is what you are experiencing. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
How the SWR meter works. | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||
30 meter add-on for HF2-V idea | Antenna |