Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been toying with the idea of putting up a 40M vertical antenna.
I have an inverted vee up at 40 feet high but it doesn't seem much good for hearing European stations. I put up a temporary 40m vertical today and heard alot more stations than on my inverted vee. I have a steel shed with a zincalum roof with an area of about 320 square feet. If I was to mount a 40m quarter wave vertical on that roof area would I have an adequate ground plane? Or, am I better off ground mounting it and running out radials? Or for something completely different, how would I go if I erected an 80m loop at about 30 feet high? I have tried to reorientate the inverted vee to better capture European stations but it doesn't seem to help, hence I am looking at other ideas. Any information gratefully accepted. Cheers Max |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 feb, 12:54, wrote:
I have been toying with the idea of putting up a 40M vertical antenna. I have an inverted vee up at 40 feet high but it doesn't seem much good for hearing European stations. I put up a temporary 40m vertical today and heard alot more stations than on my inverted vee. I have a steel shed with a zincalum roof with an area of about 320 square feet. If I was to mount a 40m quarter wave vertical on that roof area would I have an adequate ground plane? Or, am I better off ground mounting it and running out radials? Or for something completely different, how would I go if I erected an 80m loop at about 30 feet high? I have tried to reorientate the inverted vee to better capture European stations but it doesn't seem to help, hence I am looking at other ideas. Any information gratefully accepted. Cheers Max Hello Max. You proved yourself that the concept is better then the current solution. Vertical polarization gives lower elevation angle of the main lobe. From an antenna standpoint I would place the antenna on the shed. It raises the feed point, giving lower elevation angle of maximum radiation. I suppose the walls are metal also and are electrically connected to the roof, so you don't get HF inside the shed. The large metal surface (roof and walls) that serves as counterpoise may be sufficient. Depending on foundation of the shed and type of soil, some radials may help you. You can try it yourself. Look to the VSWR or impedance of the quarter wave as it is now. Add 2 floating radials from opposite edge of the roof. Vary the length and see what happens with the VSWR or impedance. When it doesn’t change much, radials will not give a large improvement. When the walls of the shed are non-metal, you will create an RF field between the roof and the soil under it (this will also lead to a common mode current on the coaxial feed line. In my opinion this is undesirable (both RF and safety). In that case I would ground the roof at several places. More thin copper grounding points are better then some thick grounding points. Safety is different. When the roof isn't connected to the walls at sufficient places, I direct hit can be fatal. Though you are pretty safe in a full metal shed when hit by lighting, when safety grounding is not OK, you might have a problem in the electrical system. When your shed lacks its own safety grounding, you will get excessive lightning current in the mains cable that runs from your home to the shed. About radials, buried, laying on the soil or elevated. Adding radials may reduce ground losses in the vicinity of the antenna, but will not change elevation of main lobe as this is mostly determined by soil properties up to many wavelengths from the antenna itself. When you make the vertical radiator longer then a quarter wave, it raises the input impedance and lowers the elevation angle of maximum radiation (you will like this). You only need a capacitor to tune out the inductive component. I use this concept for the 40m antenna for JOTA (16m vertical). The increased input impedance, reduces the current that must be drawn from the ground system (in your case the roof with or without radials). You may increase the electrical length by adding a capacative head. Some design info from the JOTA logfile. 13m radiator with 8 elevated quarter wave radials (2m above ground), gives about 60 Ohms in series with about 200 Ohms inductive part. All over pastoral ground. Last year we extended the radiator to about 16 m and used a 50 ohms to 200 Ohms transformer and just 3 floating radials. The reason for the many "abouts" is because of measurements are done with primitive antenna materials at the grass production ground adjacent to the scouting camp. Best regards and good DX. Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl without abc, the mail is OK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Wim,
thank you for your reply. The shed has metal walls, roof and frame. I will try what you suggest with the radials and see what happens. Cheers Max |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
VERTICAL GROUND RADIAL QUESTION | Antenna | |||
Technical vertical question | Antenna | |||
voltage fed vertical question | Antenna | |||
40m Endfed vertical QRP question | Antenna | |||
Grounding for Vertical Question | Antenna |