Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not an amateur radio guy or anything like that. I recently bought
a Kaito KA1103 Worldband Radio, mainly to get better reception of AM stations. I sometimes like to listen to discussion shows at night and the local selection is limited. The reviews seemed to indicate that the radio has good AM discrimination, etc. Well, so far it doesn't seem to be any better than my little 20 year old Sony Walkman radio. I've also scanned through the short wave frequencies and found nothing, but that was not my main reason for getting the radio. The radio came with an "antenna" that seems to be one big loop of wire with a plug at one end that goes into the radio and a plastic clip at the other end. I'm not sure what to do with it and have read somewhat contradictory advice on the internet. Nothing that I have tried has resulted in any better reception. I also see somewhat inexpensive loop antennas advertised. Any suggestions for improving AM reception would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
pixel_a_ted wrote:
I'm not an amateur radio guy or anything like that. I recently bought a Kaito KA1103 Worldband Radio, mainly to get better reception of AM stations. I sometimes like to listen to discussion shows at night and the local selection is limited. The reviews seemed to indicate that the radio has good AM discrimination, etc. Well, so far it doesn't seem to be any better than my little 20 year old Sony Walkman radio. I've also scanned through the short wave frequencies and found nothing, but that was not my main reason for getting the radio. The radio came with an "antenna" that seems to be one big loop of wire with a plug at one end that goes into the radio and a plastic clip at the other end. I'm not sure what to do with it and have read somewhat contradictory advice on the internet. Nothing that I have tried has resulted in any better reception. I also see somewhat inexpensive loop antennas advertised. Any suggestions for improving AM reception would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. First, the external antenna is intended for shortwave, so that's not going to help. The reviews I read stated that AM was quite good, better than some radios that I know are good, but that the AC adapter is quite noisy. If you are using that, try running just on batteries. If that doesn't work out for you, locate a GE Superradio or go C Crane site and get a CC Radio. The CC Radio is the best I've ever used that has straight AM detection and costs less than $300. Their site is www.ccrane.com. good luck tom K0TAR |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
pixel_a_ted wrote:
I'm not an amateur radio guy or anything like that. I recently bought a Kaito KA1103 Worldband Radio, mainly to get better reception of AM stations. I sometimes like to listen to discussion shows at night and the local selection is limited. The reviews seemed to indicate that the radio has good AM discrimination, etc. Well, so far it doesn't seem to be any better than my little 20 year old Sony Walkman radio. I've also scanned through the short wave frequencies and found nothing, but that was not my main reason for getting the radio. The radio came with an "antenna" that seems to be one big loop of wire with a plug at one end that goes into the radio and a plastic clip at the other end. I'm not sure what to do with it and have read somewhat contradictory advice on the internet. Nothing that I have tried has resulted in any better reception. I also see somewhat inexpensive loop antennas advertised. Any suggestions for improving AM reception would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. It looks like the original model CCRadio that I own has been replaced by the CCRadio-2. tom K0TAR |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "pixel_a_ted" wrote in message ... I'm not an amateur radio guy or anything like that. I recently bought a Kaito KA1103 Worldband Radio, mainly to get better reception of AM stations. I sometimes like to listen to discussion shows at night and the local selection is limited. The reviews seemed to indicate that the radio has good AM discrimination, etc. Well, so far it doesn't seem to be any better than my little 20 year old Sony Walkman radio. I've also scanned through the short wave frequencies and found nothing, but that was not my main reason for getting the radio. The radio came with an "antenna" that seems to be one big loop of wire with a plug at one end that goes into the radio and a plastic clip at the other end. I'm not sure what to do with it and have read somewhat contradictory advice on the internet. Nothing that I have tried has resulted in any better reception. I also see somewhat inexpensive loop antennas advertised. Any suggestions for improving AM reception would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Hi "Ted" If you wanted AM stations in the 0.5 to 2 MHz band, you might be happy with a tuned loop. I went "overboard and made a big multiturn loop that can be located outside but tuned and rotated from inside, It gets too complicated to both rotate and tune a big, outside AM Loop antenna. But, that really works well for reception of AM radio from long distances. You might find something in this site http://www.mindspring.com/~loop_antenna/ Jerry KD6JDJ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here what you ight consider doing;
The additional wire should, hopefully, increase the signal you capture. If you have window close to where you listen to your radio, stretch the wire around the room , at the highest level you can INDOORS. I use cup hooks to supend the wire. This will improve the shortwave signals. To improve the MW signals in the AM band, do some researach at some of the Yahoo groups on MW natennas and it has much more infor mation than I can list here. The 1103 is good portable, but DO NOT hook it up to an outside atenna. It will overload and you will get false signals everywhere. A good loop antenna or a Select-Tenna will improve the MW section. Hope this helps. Email me if you have questions. KE5LDO. Quote:
__________________
Extra Class Volunteer Examiner ARRL Instructor |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 4:09*pm, pixel_a_ted
Any suggestions for improving AM reception would be greatly appreciated. ___________ Medium-wave AM reception can be difficult in an indoor environment due to shielding provided by nearby wires and especially from the steel frame of a building. Radio noise from light dimmers, touch lamps etc nearby (yours and/or your neighbors) can limit AM reception, also. This Kaito radio has a built-in ferrite antenna that is used for AM broadcast reception. It is directional with best reception when the longest dimension of the radio is perpendicular to the direction to the station it is receiving. The telescopic whip is used for short wave and FM broadcast reception, only. According to the Operation Manual at http://www.ccrane.com/instruction-ma...1103-radio.pdf , this radio needs a field strength as high as 1 mV/m on the AM broadcast band. That is rather high, but some of the 50,000 watt AM stations like WJR (760), WLW (700), KMOX (1120) etc can produce nighttime fields that high or higher over wide areas of the US. The "Local/DX" switch probably should be in the DX position when listening to distant stations, unless you are located close to an AM station with a very strong signal at your location (experiment). You might take your radio outside to see if reception improves. If it does you may need to use an external MW antenna such a "long wire" or the C. Crane unit at http://www.ccrane.com/antennas/am-an...m-antenna.aspx .. Unfortunately, the Crane antenna costs more than you paid for your Kaito radio, probably. RF |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
tom wrote:
The CC (Crane) Radio is the best I've ever used that has straight AM detection and costs less than $300. I read rave reviews so I bought one and the display failed. I only use the memory channels now. It's also not any better than my Yacht Boy 400. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
tom wrote: The CC (Crane) Radio is the best I've ever used that has straight AM detection and costs less than $300. I read rave reviews so I bought one and the display failed. I only use the memory channels now. It's also not any better than my Yacht Boy 400. Sorry to hear that. Mine is running strong at about 10 years old. Never played with a Yacht Boy. My experience with Grundigs is with the smaller/cheaper models which aren't impressive and the giant ones that are way too expensive for the performance they give. The big ones aren't bad, but not close to the performance of what I could buy a used amateur rig for the same price, so I've stayed away. tom K0TAR |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:54:34 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: tom wrote: The CC (Crane) Radio is the best I've ever used that has straight AM detection and costs less than $300. I read rave reviews so I bought one and the display failed. I only use the memory channels now. It's also not any better than my Yacht Boy 400. The display in my original CCRadio failed, too -- I sent it back to the Crane folks and they put in a new display for $25, one that has much better longevity, they say. Still going strong after several years. Bob k5qwg |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob wrote:
The display in my original CCRadio failed, too -- I sent it back to the Crane folks and they put in a new display for $25, one that has much better longevity, they say. Still going strong after several years. Thanks Bob, maybe I should do that. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Newbie question | Shortwave | |||
Newbie Question | Scanner | |||
Newbie question -- Probably first one ever | Scanner | |||
Newbie (More or Less) Question | Scanner | |||
NEWBIE Question | Shortwave |