Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
hi
Was going to put up some antennas turned via a rotator. Normally I guess people use some 'flexible' type coax like a RG213 Wondering if cost was no object is there some coax that is better rated to withstand this type of repeated flexing ?? Thanks |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ml wrote:
hi Was going to put up some antennas turned via a rotator. Normally I guess people use some 'flexible' type coax like a RG213 Wondering if cost was no object is there some coax that is better rated to withstand this type of repeated flexing ?? Thanks Hi Ml: There used to be a "type" of RG-8 coax called "superflex" that was much more flexable than standard RG-8 (this was back when RG-8 was still a mil standard)but I've not seen it for some time. But I've used RG-213 for years with no problems just remember to leave a big enough loop so the coax is not stressed to much. The kind of coax with the foil under the braid is NOT good for this loop. John Passaneau W3JXP |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
John Passaneau wrote: ml wrote: hi Was going to put up some antennas turned via a rotator. Normally I guess people use some 'flexible' type coax like a RG213 Wondering if cost was no object is there some coax that is better rated to withstand this type of repeated flexing ?? Thanks Hi Ml: There used to be a "type" of RG-8 coax called "superflex" that was much more flexable than standard RG-8 (this was back when RG-8 was still a mil standard)but I've not seen it for some time. But I've used RG-213 for years with no problems just remember to leave a big enough loop so the coax is not stressed to much. The kind of coax with the foil under the braid is NOT good for this loop. John Passaneau W3JXP Hi Thank you very much for responding. was hoping more might respond to what I thought was a fair question. Interesting wonder why you don't recomend the foil type I guess the extra flexing would damage it?? Perhaps i can just find some double braided shield then... thanks |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
the coax is not stressed to much. The kind of coax with the foil under
the braid is NOT good for this loop. John Passaneau W3JXP Hi Thank you very much for responding. was hoping more might respond to what I thought was a fair question. Interesting wonder why you don't recomend the foil type I guess the extra flexing would damage it?? Yes. Not only does the foil shield break up, but the abrasion between the dissimilar metals causes noise Perhaps i can just find some double braided shield then... A good 95% + shield like Belden 8214 or eq. foam type with stranded center conductor is the best. Extra shields will complicate matters. If you have multiple runs, the crosstalk between cables will me much less than the antennas talking to each other anyway unless you have a lot of vertical separation. It is good to use double shielding on duplexers and hardline on fixed antennas. When going around a rotor, you will have maximum life if you provide strain relief and broad loops like the remote broadcast trucks do. The coax will go bad at the loop first. Another answer is to use hardline up the tower and 8214 or RG-214 and N connectors for the rotor jumper, and replace it occasionally. Of course the connectors must be strain relieved, wrapped and well sealed to avoid any mechanical disturbance or water intrusion. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"JB" wrote: the coax is not stressed to much. The kind of coax with the foil under the braid is NOT good for this loop. John Passaneau W3JXP Hi Thank you very much for responding. was hoping more might respond to what I thought was a fair question. Interesting wonder why you don't recomend the foil type I guess the extra flexing would damage it?? Yes. Not only does the foil shield break up, but the abrasion between the dissimilar metals causes noise Perhaps i can just find some double braided shield then... A good 95% + shield like Belden 8214 or eq. foam type with stranded center conductor is the best. Extra shields will complicate matters. If you have multiple runs, the crosstalk between cables will me much less than the antennas talking to each other anyway unless you have a lot of vertical separation. It is good to use double shielding on duplexers and hardline on fixed antennas. When going around a rotor, you will have maximum life if you provide strain relief and broad loops like the remote broadcast trucks do. The coax will go bad at the loop first. Another answer is to use hardline up the tower and 8214 or RG-214 and N connectors for the rotor jumper, and replace it occasionally. Of course the connectors must be strain relieved, wrapped and well sealed to avoid any mechanical disturbance or water intrusion. thanks much for a ll the tips |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
N9ZAS. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() You might want to check out Belden 9913F (flex) which is a low loss coaxial cable which very well at frequencies up to 1ghz. N9ZAS. It too has a foil shield. It is just like LMR400 but with a more flexible jacket and stranded #10 center. Belden 8913 is just like 9913 without the foil. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Will these rotator control boxes work? (was Can you help identify this rotator?) | Antenna | |||
FS: Coax Connectors, Adapters & Bulk Coax Cable | Swap | |||
Coax To Coax Noise transfer ? | Antenna | |||
Coax To Coax Noise Transfer ? | Shortwave | |||
FS:RG8X 18 FT LENGTH COAX WITH COAX CONNECTOR | Swap |