Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm confused about the requirements for a counterpoise for an end-fed wire antenna. I understand
that it's needed, but I don't understand what the requirements are. Can a ground stake at the base of the feed point serve as a counterpoise, or does it need to be another wire running under the ground below the antenna? If a wire is required, how long does the counterpoise have to be? Would it be better to use insulated or uninsulated wire for a buried counterpoise? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KJ4NTS wrote:
I'm confused about the requirements for a counterpoise for an end-fed wire antenna. I understand that it's needed, but I don't understand what the requirements are. If you get 100 replies, you'll probably get 110 different answers to that. Can a ground stake at the base of the feed point serve as a counterpoise, or does it need to be another wire running under the ground below the antenna? No, it makes a good DC ground for lightening protection. A counterpoise can be run almost anywhere, and the more the better. If a wire is required, how long does the counterpoise have to be? ..28 wavelength is something I have read, while most people use 1/4 wavelength, or an electrical equivalent (shorter due to velocity factor). Would it be better to use insulated or uninsulated wire for a buried counterpoise? Uninsulated. Not that some antennas don't need a counterpoise, for example a 5/8th wave antenna or an end fed zepp which uses no or a very short counterpoise. A friend of mine has a commercial antenna, which consists of a matching network, a trap and around 40 feet of wire. It covers 10,20 and 40 meters with no counterpoise. The matching network can only handle 25 watts, My speculation is that it's sort of a 5/8th wave type antenna with loading coils to eletrically lengthen it. It could also be a 50 ohm 25 watt resistor with a long tail on the "hot" end, but I really doubt it. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:30:31 GMT, "KJ4NTS" wrote:
I'm confused about the requirements for a counterpoise for an end-fed wire antenna. I understand that it's needed, but I don't understand what the requirements are. Hi OM, What are YOUR requirements? (What bands, how long is it?) Can a ground stake at the base of the feed point serve as a counterpoise, or does it need to be another wire running under the ground below the antenna? Both, and more wire(s). If a wire is required, how long does the counterpoise have to be? For single band operation? (You aren't very clear about this.) The deeper into the ground (and deeper than 6 inches doesn't count for much), the less resonant it will become. Make it as long as your wire overhead - maybe less. Would it be better to use insulated or uninsulated wire for a buried counterpoise? Doesn't matter. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 2, 12:30*pm, "KJ4NTS" wrote:
I'm confused about the requirements for a counterpoise for an end-fed wire antenna. *I understand that it's needed, but I don't understand what the requirements are. Can a ground stake at the base of the feed point serve as a counterpoise, or does it need to be another wire running under the ground below the antenna? If a wire is required, how long does the counterpoise have to be? Would it be better to use insulated or uninsulated wire for a buried counterpoise? With regard to whether you need a counterpoise or not. If your antenna has two wires at the open end (feed point) then they both must be connected to the transmitter where there is also an additional provision for a ground connection ( a must in all cases as the chassis is floating).If the radiator has only one termination then only one transmission wire can be connected to it leaving the other wire to be connected to a ground system which in effect balances your radiator with a load that does not radiate unless it is the form of a counterpoise. The effectiveness of your ground system can be measured by its effectiveness in supplying a resistive feed impedance somewhat near 30 ohms (above 20 ohms) or so where your transmitter does not encounter any problems, a counterpoise will present a higher impedance. An end fed antenna cannot be of a fractional wavelength and thus the ground field or counterpoise is required to be added to provide an impedance that can be fed by the transmitter without a problem so you can enjoy useage of your antenna |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Art Unwin" wrote in message ... On Aug 2, 12:30 pm, "KJ4NTS" wrote: ART IS BACK! don't believe a thing he says, even if you think it kind of makes sense, which it doesn't. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 2, 12:30�pm, "KJ4NTS" wrote:
I'm confused about the requirements for a counterpoise for an end-fed wire antenna. �I understand that it's needed, but I don't understand what the requirements are. Can a ground stake at the base of the feed point serve as a counterpoise, or does it need to be another wire running under the ground below the antenna? If a wire is required, how long does the counterpoise have to be? Would it be better to use insulated or uninsulated wire for a buried counterpoise? An end fed wire antenna should be very close to a half wave in length for the intended frequency. If coax fed, the objective is to make the antenna look as balanced as possible by insuring that the current in the counterpoise and the radiating element are very nearly equal. A half wave end fed is a high voltage low current antenna, and everything around the antenna will affect its impedance and balance, obviously the counterpoise will have a large effect. If the end fed antenna (half wave) is not in the clear, then the counterpoise is cut-and-try. If in the clear, antenna modelling will provide useful results, see W8JI web pages. A counterpoise is needed, but without knowing your exact situation, cut-and-try is your best bet. Gary N4AST |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 2, 3:01*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
An end fed antenna cannot be of a fractional wavelength... _________________ ? ? Art, note that the vertical monopoles used by MW broadcast stations are ALL fractional-wavelength radiators, and probably 99% of them are end fed. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 ago, 19:30, "KJ4NTS" wrote:
I'm confused about the requirements for a counterpoise for an end-fed wire antenna. *I understand that it's needed, but I don't understand what the requirements are. Can a ground stake at the base of the feed point serve as a counterpoise, or does it need to be another wire running under the ground below the antenna? If a wire is required, how long does the counterpoise have to be? Would it be better to use insulated or uninsulated wire for a buried counterpoise? Hello, As you might know, the current that goes into the end-fed antenna equals the current that goes into the counterpoise. The requirement for a good, efficient counterpoise is that it should not dissipate the RF power and that (preference) the impedance is far below the feed point impedance of the end-fed antenna. The requirement last mentioned is for assuring that you can feed your antenna with an unbalanced feeder (coaxial cable). It also helps to avoid that when you touch a coaxial connector while transmitting, you don't burn your fingers. Half or full wave resonant antennas have high input impedance (kOhm range), hence requirements for counterpoise are easy to meet. It is easy to create a counterpoise impedance of several hundreds Ohms. For a quarter wave (or shorter antenna), the resonant impedance is in the 30 Ohms range or below (for short antennas). In that case it may be very difficult to get counterpoise impedance far below 30 Ohms. As Geoffrey mentioned, with 100 replies, you will have 100 different answers. There are many ways to make a counterpoise; all have their advantages (and disadvantages). Generally spoken, the more metal the better. However at a certain point, doubling the amount/length of metal will not give significant increase. When you add more metal and the antenna impedance at resonance doesn't change, adding more metal is not necessary. In my opinion, many short wires are better then one long wire. When you have good ground conductivity, driving rods deep into the ground is not necessary (skin depth issue). In case of single frequency band operation, you might consider 2 or 3 elevated quarter wave resonating counterpoise wires. I know this is not a direct answer to your question, but I hope it will bring you closer to an answer. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl please remove the obvious character combination in case of PM. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 3, 5:24*am, Richard Fry wrote:
On Aug 2, 3:01*pm, Art Unwin wrote: An end fed antenna cannot be of a fractional wavelength... _________________ ? ? Art, note that the vertical monopoles used by MW broadcast stations are ALL fractional-wavelength radiators, and probably 99% of them are end fed. I regard a radiator with a counterpoise as being center fed of a given impedance to connect to regardles whether the counterpoise is above ground or not. If a radiator is of a closed cuircuit form it may be fed at any point in physical terms. Other peoples definitions may vary. The poster I understood to be at the position of the end of a transmission line with two wires in hand and wanted advice from that point to procede. If his advisers are going to quibble then he needs to go elsewhere for advise or settle for a poll. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KJ4NTS" wrote in message
... I'm confused about the requirements for a counterpoise for an end-fed wire antenna. I understand that it's needed, but I don't understand what the requirements are. Can a ground stake at the base of the feed point serve as a counterpoise, or does it need to be another wire running under the ground below the antenna? If a wire is required, how long does the counterpoise have to be? Would it be better to use insulated or uninsulated wire for a buried counterpoise? All these questions depend on your particular situation. In a typical antenna installation you would first seek to follow the instructions for that antenna. Especially if you don't understand the physics involved. You will probably already have some sort of ground through the power supply. Any better ground than that must actually be better to whatever energy you are trying to "ground". Someone mentioned RF in the shack and being bit from the chassis or connector shell. The best way to avoid that is for the energy at the coax connector to see 50 ohms, and for the radiating portion of the antenna to be well out of the shack. In that case, you don't need an RF ground on the radio. A ground stake at the feed point along with a remote tuner should be sufficient if you have really low resistance soil. You will probably benefit by adding a counterpoise and you will probably never have a perfect ground. It is better to have uninsulated wire because it will conduct into the ground. Some think insulated is better because it will last longer for a little expense in performance. A remote tuner (or matched antenna) at the feed point, will keep the RF to the transmission line and prevent high voltages on the line and keep losses to the minimum. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|