Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
Have you come across anything useful published by the FCC about polarisations used for digital terrestrial television. Chris Yes. http://www.fcc.gov/mb/video/tvq.html is the start page for most television queries for US, Canadian and Mexican TV stations. Type something relevant in the Call Sign block and press Enter. On the next page, click any of the station's lines and you will next be taken to a detail page (my term) with many specifics for the station, commonly including antenna polarization. (You may omit the callsign and instead enter a city, further downpage. Then, all that city's licensed stations will be listed and you can bring up detail pages one at a time.) Just now, I determined that KTVU is Horizontal and KABC is Circular (H=V). Please note that the detail page lists data for every major paper on file with the FCC (or neighbor government). That is, you find separate clusters of data for the station as licensed, plus any construction permits, applications, modifications, etc. Be sure of what you're seeing, as some of it represents planning that might never be approved or funded. Some data will open in a new window; the coverage maps are that way. Happy hunting, Sal |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
christofire wrote:
"Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:24:27 +0100, "christofire" wrote: Are all gmail users in the USA then? Our OP is halfway between Annapolis and D.C. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Did you know that from prior communication with the OP or is there some data in his posting that gives a clue to that fact? Take a deep breath, and don't see insults or snubs behind every tree. - Respectfully, 73 de Mike N3LI - |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... christofire wrote: "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:24:27 +0100, "christofire" wrote: Are all gmail users in the USA then? Our OP is halfway between Annapolis and D.C. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Did you know that from prior communication with the OP or is there some data in his posting that gives a clue to that fact? Take a deep breath, and don't see insults or snubs behind every tree. - Respectfully, 73 de Mike N3LI - QSD Chris |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
david boyd wrote:
Are there any websites that give the polarization for TV signals? For the US, the FCC database tells the polarization (elliptical is pretty common.. mostly horizontal, with some vertical component) For instance, here's the stuff for KCBS-TV in the Los Angeles area: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws....cility_id=9628 Horizontal pol But channel 11, KTTV http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws....ility_id=22208 has Elliptical.. The search page is he http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/p...d/sta_sear.htm |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Group:
As not all will be familiar with Q-signals: QSD Is my keying defective? when used as a question Your keying is defective.. Regards, Mac N8TT -- J. McLaughlin; Michigan, USA Home: "christofire" wrote in message ... "Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... christofire wrote: "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:24:27 +0100, "christofire" wrote: Are all gmail users in the USA then? Our OP is halfway between Annapolis and D.C. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Did you know that from prior communication with the OP or is there some data in his posting that gives a clue to that fact? Take a deep breath, and don't see insults or snubs behind every tree. - Respectfully, 73 de Mike N3LI - QSD Chris |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 5, 2:34*pm, Jim Lux wrote:
david boyd wrote: Are there any websites that give the polarization for TV signals? For the US, the FCC database tells the polarization (elliptical is pretty common.. mostly horizontal, with some vertical component) For instance, here's the stuff for KCBS-TV in the Los Angeles area:http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws....cc/prod/eng_tv.... Horizontal pol But channel 11, KTTVhttp://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/eng_tv.... has Elliptical.. The search page is hehttp://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/p...d/sta_sear.htm Concerning a TV station using elliptical polarization is there a purposeful phase difference between the horizontal and vertical fields or is it simply just dividing power between horizontal and verical radiators with no concern as to phase relationship Jimmie |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JIMMIE" wrote in message ... On Oct 5, 2:34 pm, Jim Lux wrote: david boyd wrote: Are there any websites that give the polarization for TV signals? For the US, the FCC database tells the polarization (elliptical is pretty common.. mostly horizontal, with some vertical component) For instance, here's the stuff for KCBS-TV in the Los Angeles area:http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws....cc/prod/eng_tv.... Horizontal pol But channel 11, KTTVhttp://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/eng_tv.... has Elliptical.. The search page is hehttp://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/p...d/sta_sear.htm Concerning a TV station using elliptical polarization is there a purposeful phase difference between the horizontal and vertical fields or is it simply just dividing power between horizontal and verical radiators with no concern as to phase relationship Jimmie Probably the latter, as is done around the world nowadays for VHF FM radio, although I confidently predict someone will contradict me with stuff about odd-order reflections changing the sense of rotation and stuff like that. Unless the receiving antennas are circularly polarised that won't count for much. There's a potential benefit when mobile receivers are in use, in some cases portable receivers as well.. In the UK the term 'mixed' polarisation is used in Band II and the broadcasters (mainly via Arqiva) don't pay extra for a specified phase relationship, but antenna manufacturers like Alan Dick (http://www.alandick.com/broadcast_an...roduct_004.htm) produce mixed-polarisation and circularly-polarised versions to suit different markets, as they would. UK terrestrial television in Bands IV/V is all plane polarised (H from 50 main stations and V from most of the rest) at the moment. DVB-H trials in L-Band may have used mixed (i.e. slant or elliptical) polarisation. Way back up the 'phone bill I posted in a thread titled 'Circular versus linear polarisation' a link to: http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/reports/1970-35.pdf which you may find interesting. Chris |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JIMMIE wrote:
Concerning a TV station using elliptical polarization is there a purposeful phase difference between the horizontal and vertical fields or is it simply just dividing power between horizontal and verical radiators with no concern as to phase relationship Jimmie If equal horizontal and vertical components are in phase, you have linear polarization. If they're 90 degrees out of phase, you have circular polarization. If they're at some other relative phase angle, you have elliptical polarization. (Actually, linear and circular are two extreme special cases of elliptical polarization.) This makes a big difference in how the waves behave. The polarization of a circularly polarized wave rotates 360 degrees each cycle, while the polarization of a linearly polarized wave is fixed. If you add equal vertical and horizontal fields in phase, you get a linearly polarized wave tilted 45 degrees relative to horizontal or vertical. If you rotate a linearly polarized receiving antenna in that field, you'll get a maximum when the antenna is aligned with the field, and zero when it's at right angles to the field, that is, tilted 45 degrees the other way. If, on the other hand, you add the linearly polarized vertical field to a linearly polarized horizontal field that's 90 degrees out of phase, you get a circularly polarized wave. The signal amplitude won't change at all as you rotate the linearly polarized receiving antenna. It'll stay at a constant 3 dB below the best response you got from the linearly polarized field. If the H and V fields are added with some other phase angle, you'll get some variation as you rotate the receiving antenna, but no complete null. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MW polarization | Antenna | |||
Polarization Loss? | Antenna | |||
Polarization Questions | Antenna | |||
ISP WAP Polarization | Antenna | |||
Polarization conversion | Antenna |