Bill wrote:
On Oct 26, 8:35 am, tom wrote:
Bill wrote:
. Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry
ones.
Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are
dead trees,
http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html
Oops, forgot to say that water, even with the contaminants of life in
it, doesn't conduct very well when frozen.

tom
K0TAR

The original question had to do with interference with radio
reception, not with conduction.

What planet do you live on?

Interference had nothing to do with the discussion.

Conduction of objects in the local environment has everything to do with
reception.

tom
K0TAR

tom wrote:


Conduction of objects in the local environment has everything to do with
reception.


Should have said conductivity.

tom
K0TAR

Bill wrote:
On Oct 26, 8:35 am, tom wrote:
Bill wrote:
. Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry
ones.
Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are
dead trees,
http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html
Oops, forgot to say that water, even with the contaminants of life in
it, doesn't conduct very well when frozen.

tom
K0TAR

The original question had to do with interference with radio
reception, not with conduction.


Your license is new in August this year. And tied to a canceled
callsign in 1999. Odd history.

tom
K0TAR

In article ,
tom wrote:

....
Your license is new in August this year. And tied to a canceled
callsign in 1999. Odd history.
....

Odd comment?
What is wrong with a new license?

Marc

--
remove bye and from mercial to get valid e-mail
http://www.heusser.com

On Oct 26, 10:40*pm, tom wrote:
Bill wrote:
On Oct 26, 8:19 am, tom wrote:
Bill wrote:
. Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry
ones.
Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are
dead trees,
http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html
You must live where it never freezes.

The original question had to do with rain, did it not? Not ice.

I was responding to "wet" versus "dead".



* The difference between summer
and winter on 2m and up is certainly noticeable and measurable here in
Minnesota.

And the difference is attributed to what?

Very very simple physics.

tom
K0TAR

I get it. You are Art today.

On Oct 27, 4:37*am, Marc Heusser
d wrote:
In article ,

*tom wrote:

... Your license is new in August this year. *And tied to a canceled
callsign in 1999. *Odd history.

...

Odd comment?
What is wrong with a new license?

Marc


And who did he look up?

On Oct 27, 6:48*am, Bill wrote:
On Oct 27, 4:37*am, Marc Heusser

d wrote:
In article ,

*tom wrote:

... Your license is new in August this year. *And tied to a canceled
callsign in 1999. *Odd history.

...

Odd comment?
What is wrong with a new license?

Marc

And who did he look up?

Just to be clear, I was first licensed in 1991, never "cancelled",
upgraded in August 2009.

And why does Tom choose to spread disinformation as part of this
discussion?

Bill wrote:
On Oct 27, 4:37 am, Marc Heusser
d wrote:
In article ,

tom wrote:

... Your license is new in August this year. And tied to a canceled
callsign in 1999. Odd history.
...

Odd comment?
What is wrong with a new license?

Marc


And who did he look up?

My apologies. It was wrong.

And to compound the problem, it was the wrong call.

tom
K0TAR

On Oct 27, 5:13*pm, tom wrote:
Bill wrote:
On Oct 27, 4:37 am, Marc Heusser
d wrote:
In article ,

*tom wrote:

... Your license is new in August this year. *And tied to a canceled
callsign in 1999. *Odd history.
...

Odd comment?
What is wrong with a new license?

Marc

And who did he look up?

My apologies. *It was wrong.

And to compound the problem, it was the wrong call.

tom
K0TAR- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Hiya, Tom --

No big deal! The tone in my posts sometimes gets snotty. Anyway, I
was interested in the discussion because I'm surrounded by pine trees
taller than my three story house.

Bill