On Mar 16, 2:30*am, wrote:
On Mar 16, 12:06*am, Bill wrote:

Variable capacitance antenna for multiband reception and transmission
http://www.google.com/patents?id=GEsbAAAAEBAJ&dq=5,625,367

There is an amazing difference between the writing he

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...ct2=HITOFF&d=P...

and the bafflegab we have been getting recently..

What is amazing is that you can use incorrect information
to describe a patent, and no one seems to notice or care.
Such as this vital tidbit of information...

Quote from United States Patent * * * * 5,625,367
"To increase the directivity of such an antenna, a parasitic
reflector element, usually tuned to a frequency slightly higher
than the driver resonant frequency, can be placed parallel to
the driver element along the boom. For further increased directivity,
one or more director elements, usually tuned to frequencies slightly
lower than the driver resonant frequency, can be placed at various
distances along the boom on the other side of the driver element
and parallel to the driver element."

Now I don't have the degree in mechanical engineering that Art has
and may have taken advantage of before he became senile and
decided to venture into antenna design, but danged if something
in this description just doesn't seem quite right to this semi-
literate
ignorant redneck. :/

I think it gives a fairly good indication of the level of attention
given
to the claims and descriptions offered during the patent process.

BTW, don't mind Jaroslav... That's just Art's latest trunk monkey
that pops out when the red button is pushed.

There is too much consistency to Art's rantings for him to be the
senile old man he pretends to be. More and more I think he is a troll.
My guess is someone from the CB newsgroup that often x-posts here. If
I am wrong I sincerely apologize to Art for I know I could through a
blot clot and be the next person with nothing better to do all day
than post the warped fantasies of my damaged mind on a newsgroup.

Jimmie

Jimmie