Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was wondering if anyone had any experience of the Meandering Antenna or
Meandering Dipole, I have found an article in Pat Hawkers book but the drawings are a bit hard to understand. I have limited space and was considering building one for 7.1 mhz Thanks John |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 30, 7:25*pm, "VK2KC" wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had any experience of the Meandering Antenna or Meandering Dipole, I have found an article in Pat Hawkers book but the drawings are a bit hard to understand. I have limited space and was considering building one for 7.1 mhz Thanks John John, the laws of Maxwell contain only distributed loads thus actual loads have to go thru the canceling process leaving only the disturbance at the bends unaccounted for. Cheers Art |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 01 May 2010 00:25:39 GMT, "VK2KC" wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had any experience of the Meandering Antenna or Meandering Dipole, I have found an article in Pat Hawkers book but the drawings are a bit hard to understand. I have limited space and was considering building one for 7.1 mhz Hi John, It is deceptively simple, and excruciatingly difficult to both build, or to describe. That is the wonder of "meander." Just by the English alone, it should inform you that how do you duplicate the meander of a drunk's walk? It's like trying to gracefully do a toe-to-heel amble 20 meters along a 12 meter long sidewalk. Imagine trying to follow turn and distance instructions at the same time while the constabulary are grading your performance. There is no defined path length to the drunk's stagger, and there is no defined length to a 7.1MHz Meander dipole. If it doesn't tune up after you build it, then you did it wrong. In other words, it's an academic joke. Can't get much clearer than that. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in
: .... Can't get much clearer than that. I recall one of my RF neighbours (VK2BBC) telling stations he was using a BTMD. That certainly (in those days) sparked a bit of interest, some new type of fabulous antenna? What was it? The acronym was for Bent Twisted Mangled Dipole. Same concept, different implementation! Owen |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1 mayo, 02:25, "VK2KC" wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had any experience of the Meandering Antenna or Meandering Dipole, I have found an article in Pat Hawkers book but the drawings are a bit hard to understand. I have limited space and was considering building one for 7.1 mhz Thanks John Hello, I assume that you talk about meandering like the zig/zag pattern on a viper or the pattern of a sidewinder. At other frequencies, yes I do have. Meandering increases the inductance per unit of length, so the propagating wave slows down. This results in a reduction of resonant length. The zig/zag wire pieces do, however, not contribute to the far field radiation. Given the same feed current, the meandered dipole radiates less then the full HW one, so the radiation resistance goes down. When your dipole length is about half of the full size length, feed point impedance goes down with almost factor 4. When you experience good VSWR in a center fed short meandered dipole, you can be sure to have losses. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl remove abc first in case of PM |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 1, 9:10*am, Wimpie wrote:
I assume that you talk about meandering like the zig/zag pattern on a viper or the pattern of a sidewinder. At other frequencies, yes I do have. There was this ham who came home drunk and spent 20 minutes beating his dipole to death. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 1, 2:37*pm, Bill wrote:
On May 1, 9:10*am, Wimpie wrote: I assume that you talk about meandering like the zig/zag pattern on a viper or the pattern of a sidewinder. At other frequencies, yes I do have. There was this ham who came home drunk and spent 20 minutes beating his dipole to death. What a Meanderthal... :/ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 1, 8:10*am, Wimpie wrote:
On 1 mayo, 02:25, "VK2KC" wrote: I was wondering if anyone had any experience of the Meandering Antenna or Meandering Dipole, I have found an article in Pat Hawkers book but the drawings are a bit hard to understand. I have limited space and was considering building one for 7.1 mhz Thanks John Hello, I assume that you talk about meandering like the zig/zag pattern on a viper or the pattern of a sidewinder. At other frequencies, yes I do have. Meandering increases the inductance per unit of length, so the propagating wave slows down. This results in a reduction of resonant length. The zig/zag wire pieces do, however, not contribute to the far field ?????? This is news to me! Can you give me a reference ? This clearly suggests that a twin wire formed in a closed circuit helix cannot radiate in the far field when it clearly can regardless of slow wave. If the dipole is clearly in equilibrium it cannot fail to radiate but then everything depends on the presented aparture and what medium it is operating under, such as a submarine at some depth in sea water versus fresh water. I have found that such arrangements start out at over 100 ohms and then gradually dampen down to 50 ohms when you start to exceed twice the full wave length and it comprises of a fully connected electrical wire circuit A fine example of a meander circuit would be a fractal arranged in full circuit form Regards Art radiation. Given the same feed current, the meandered dipole radiates less then the full HW one, so the radiation resistance goes down. When your dipole length is about half of the full size length, feed point impedance goes down with almost factor 4. When you experience good VSWR in a center fed short meandered dipole, you can be sure to have losses. Best regards, Wim PA3DJSwww.tetech.nl remove abc first in case of PM |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/1/2010 8:03 PM, Art Unwin wrote:
On May 1, 8:10 am, wrote: snip Meandering increases the inductance per unit of length, so the propagating wave slows down. This results in a reduction of resonant length. The zig/zag wire pieces do, however, not contribute to the far field ?????? This is news to me! Can you give me a reference ? This clearly suggests that a twin wire formed in a closed circuit helix cannot radiate in the far field when it clearly can regardless of slow wave. If the dipole is clearly in equilibrium it cannot fail to radiate but then everything depends on the presented aparture and what medium it is operating under, such as a submarine at some depth in sea water versus fresh water. I have found that such arrangements start out at over 100 ohms and then gradually dampen down to 50 ohms when you start to exceed twice the full wave length and it comprises of a fully connected electrical wire circuit A fine example of a meander circuit would be a fractal arranged in full circuit form Regards Art Another fine example of yourself, Art. Yes, of course it's news to you. Your physics is from a different universe. Nothing you typed has anything to do with the thread. As usual. It's just a continuation of your dysreality monologue. tom K0TAR |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 mayo, 03:03, Art Unwin wrote:
On May 1, 8:10*am, Wimpie wrote: On 1 mayo, 02:25, "VK2KC" wrote: I was wondering if anyone had any experience of the Meandering Antenna or Meandering Dipole, I have found an article in Pat Hawkers book but the drawings are a bit hard to understand. I have limited space and was considering building one for 7.1 mhz Thanks John Hello, I assume that you talk about meandering like the zig/zag pattern on a viper or the pattern of a sidewinder. At other frequencies, yes I do have. Meandering increases the inductance per unit of length, so the propagating wave slows down. This results in a reduction of resonant length. The zig/zag wire pieces do, however, not contribute to the far field ?????? This is news to me! Can you give me a reference ? This clearly suggests that a twin wire formed in a closed circuit helix cannot radiate in the far field when it clearly can regardless of slow wave. If the dipole is clearly in equilibrium it cannot fail to radiate but then everything depends on the presented aparture and what medium it is operating under, such as a submarine at some depth in sea water versus fresh water. I have found that such arrangements start out at over 100 ohms and then gradually dampen down to 50 ohms when you start to exceed twice the full wave length and it comprises of a fully connected electrical wire circuit A fine example of a meander circuit would be a fractal arranged in full circuit form Regards Art radiation. Given the same feed current, the meandered dipole radiates less then the full HW one, so the radiation resistance goes down. When your dipole length is about half of the full size length, feed point impedance goes down with almost factor 4. When you experience good VSWR in a center fed short meandered dipole, you can be sure to have losses. Best regards, Wim PA3DJSwww.tetech.nl remove abc first in case of PM Hello Art, The zig/zag or square wave pattern is frequently used in planar structures (PCB antennas or metal on plastic/paper). Regarding your request for references, look at UHF (800-900 MHz) RFID tags/transponders (TI, Alian, Rafsec, Feig, Deister, Sams, etc). They use meandering to shorten the overall length of half wave resonating structures. The radiaton pattern still matches that of a dipole, so negligible radiation in axial direction. As you are a ham also, it is not too difficult to prove this yourself. To get some axial sensitivity, the width of the structure should no longer be overall length of structure. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl without abc, PM will reach me. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|