Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My 40/80 (modified for extra bands) W9INN dipole is getting old and I
need to replace the center connector. I am not sure what Bill W9INN used for the center connector but it looks like a W2AU 1:1 balun. Can someone verify what Bill used and recommend a replacement. Dick AA5VU W9INN (SK) is missed! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dick,
Any decent balun built into a center connector is OK. W2AU or Radio Works are examples. You can even use the budwing center connector plus a separate balun. Dave K4JRB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"David Thompson" wrote: Dick, Any decent balun built into a center connector is OK. W2AU or Radio Works are examples. You can even use the budwing center connector plus a separate balun. Dave K4JRB Thanks but my last balun was tossed in the Atlantic Ocean in 1979 and I will never (ever) use another one. Bill, W9INN, used a center connector that looked like the W2AU balun in in antennas. I worry that the W2AU may be more than a center conductor |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This posting is more of an update. I pulled the old W9INN down for
inspection and found a crack in the PVC. It was interesting to note the imprint on the top of the center conductor (not a balun) says W2AU; however, it does not look like a W2AU on any web page. It has ground strap running from top to bottom. To make a long story short, the crack in top of the device was easily repaired using PVC cement and it passed all continuity tests. It is back in place and working FB. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/4/2010 12:31 PM, aRKay wrote:
This posting is more of an update. I pulled the old W9INN down for inspection and found a crack in the PVC. It was interesting to note the imprint on the top of the center conductor (not a balun) says W2AU; however, it does not look like a W2AU on any web page. It has ground strap running from top to bottom. To make a long story short, the crack in top of the device was easily repaired using PVC cement and it passed all continuity tests. It is back in place and working FB. That was the old or original style of the W2AU center insulator. You could get with or without a balun inside. The strap was to provide a way to ground the shield of the coax for lighting protection via the hanging eyelet. I remember them from the seventies as a common connection method. John W3JXP |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
John Passaneau wrote: On 6/4/2010 12:31 PM, aRKay wrote: This posting is more of an update. I pulled the old W9INN down for inspection and found a crack in the PVC. It was interesting to note the imprint on the top of the center conductor (not a balun) says W2AU; however, it does not look like a W2AU on any web page. It has ground strap running from top to bottom. To make a long story short, the crack in top of the device was easily repaired using PVC cement and it passed all continuity tests. It is back in place and working FB. That was the old or original style of the W2AU center insulator. You could get with or without a balun inside. The strap was to provide a way to ground the shield of the coax for lighting protection via the hanging eyelet. I remember them from the seventies as a common connection method. John W3JXP John, Thank you for the clarification. Too bad it is no longer available. I think the current W2AU is a true balun rather than a center insulator. I never used the strap for lightning protection. The last balun I owned or used was tossed in the Atlantic Ocean on 1980 and I have never used one since then. I will have to live with my repaired W9INN center insulator. Dick AA5VU |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|