Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I tried a shortwave radio group first, but no answers. Should have posted here, first. Enjoy sw listening, but frankly not all that sharp re antennas. Over the past few months, I have seen several ads for those handheld sw receivers and transceivers. From different mfgs. About the size of the typical hand-held scanner receiver. They all seem to cover up to at least 30 MHz, and most beyond. Got to thinking about this a bit. What do they use for an antenna for 30 MHz and below ? I have a long end fed antenna for my listening. Obviously they have a short "something" antenna. How effective is a short "something" around 5 to 10 MHz, e.g. ? How can it work down there at all ? I can visualize s tuned ferrite loop, such as the very old fashioned AM table radios used to have, but wouldn't this only be effective over a very small range ? Or, do they expect you to hook up something "decent" to it, even though it is supposed to be portable, and is very small ? Any technical explanation on this would be most appreciated. Thanks, Bob |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 14:52:15 -0400, Bob wrote:
I have a long end fed antenna for my listening. Obviously they have a short "something" antenna. How effective is a short "something" around 5 to 10 MHz, e.g. ? How can it work down there at all ? I can visualize s tuned ferrite loop, such as the very old fashioned AM table radios used to have, but wouldn't this only be effective over a very small range ? Hi Bob, A make and model number would get you a more definitive answer. However, for the broader question, and as you undoubtedly expect, more antenna is better - to a point. Some will argue, theoretically, otherwise. I go with results. When I was in South Africa (no, not the World Cup), I took along one of Radio Shack's cheapest SW radios. It had the conventional whip, and it offered the conventional whimp. However, having foresight, I also took along about 20 feet of wirewrap wire with a quarter taped onto one end. At the close of day, I would wrap one end around the shortened whip and I would toss the quarter into the rafters (we stayed in thatched covered huts), all of a ten or fourteen foot height; and signals came booming in from all over the continent and Europe. Another thing missing from these small jobs are a tuned front end. In fact, you can spend a lot of money on SW radios and still not get front end tuning. A preselector, or simple antenna tuner (as cheap as one as you can find, or build one for $10) will go far, far, far. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bob wrote: How effective is a short "something" around 5 to 10 MHz, e.g. ? How can it work down there at all ? Bob- Like Richard, I have one of the small Radio Shack SW Receivers. I think it was made for them by Sangean. It has a telescoping antenna that may be as long as 36 inches when extended. No, a 36 inch antenna is not as good as a longer wire for Shortwave reception. Someone with a better understanding of antenna theory may be able to calculate just how much worse it is, but suppose it receives a signal at a 20 dB lower level (1/100th the power level or 1/10th the voltage) than a full-size antenna. All you need is a stronger signal to make up for it. But when propagation is good, signals can be quite strong. Even so, it wouldn't hurt to take along some extra antenna wire! Fred |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: 3 P110 UHF Handhelds | Swap | |||
Antenna Simulation Parameters and Folded Dipole Antenna Question... | Antenna | |||
ssb cappable handhelds? | CB | |||
10m Handhelds | Equipment | |||
GE Ericsson PCS Handhelds for sale | Swap |