Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I've noticed most homebuilt amateur antennas use tubing and usually copper, whereas commercial antennas typically use round bar, either steel or Aluminum. I understand the advantages of the materials in terms of electrical conductivity and weather resistance, however I dont understand the pro's and cons of using tube vs round bar? Can you point me to a book that may discuss this? Have studies been done re the effect of a layer of oxidation on the performance of the antenna? Finally, there is plenty of material about designing antennae for a band, but every little about designing it at a particular impedence, can you point me to a discussion on this too? Thanks Steven |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:12:41 -0700 (PDT), InfRes
wrote: I dont understand the pro's and cons of using tube vs round bar? Can you point me to a book that may discuss this? Hi Steven, No book necessary. Walk into a store that sells any of this and you will tell several things immediately: 1. what is available; 2. what is affordable; 3. which weighs more for no increase in performance. Have studies been done re the effect of a layer of oxidation on the performance of the antenna? Oxidation is another form of insulation. Lots of antennas are insulated. They have been studied galore. If the oxidation becomes as thick as a vinyl jacket on your coax, then the antenna is going to resonate at a lower frequency. Finally, there is plenty of material about designing antennae for a band, but every little about designing it at a particular impedence, can you point me to a discussion on this too? Those references are too numerous to recite in one place - that is what google is for. To the nature of your question, there is no reliable "formula" for all styles of antenna that can provide a satisfactory answer. Even simple antennas have complex relationships. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "InfRes" wrote in message ... Hi, I've noticed most homebuilt amateur antennas use tubing and usually copper, whereas commercial antennas typically use round bar, either steel or Aluminum. I understand the advantages of the materials in terms of electrical conductivity and weather resistance, however I dont understand the pro's and cons of using tube vs round bar? Can you point me to a book that may discuss this? Have studies been done re the effect of a layer of oxidation on the performance of the antenna? Finally, there is plenty of material about designing antennae for a band, but every little about designing it at a particular impedence, can you point me to a discussion on this too? Thanks Steven Electrically there is not much differance in using tubing or rods. It is mainly about the cost, weight and strength. Copper is used by many at home because you can get it at the local stores where aluminum is often hard to come by in lots of towns. Also you can solder to copper where not many can solder or weld aluminum. The impedance is not usually that much concern, Just design for gain and f/b ratio and then match whatever impedance you have to the transmission line you are going to use. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 30, 11:12*am, InfRes wrote:
Hi, I've noticed most homebuilt amateur antennas use tubing and usually copper, whereas commercial antennas typically use round bar, either steel or Aluminum. I understand the advantages of the materials in terms of electrical conductivity and weather resistance, however I dont understand the pro's and cons of using tube vs round bar? Can you point me to a book that may discuss this? Have studies been done re the effect of a layer of oxidation on the performance of the antenna? Finally, there is plenty of material about designing antennae for a band, but every little about designing it at a particular impedence, can you point me to a discussion on this too? Copper has the advantages that copper pipe and fittings are available at any hardware store or home improvement store. Aluminum isn't exactly rare but it's not so easy to find in your hometown on a Sunday afternoon at a retail store. Copper is also easily joined with solder by just about anyone using very simple tools. Aluminum can be welded but this requires more skill and a welding machine. Aluminum is a superior antenna material in terms of strength per dollar or strength per weight, but not quite as readily available. Very few aluminum antenna designs use solid bar, with the exception of VHF/UHF or tips where the elements are so skinny that there's no point to making them hollow. The vast majority of HF aluminum antennas are not solid bar but nested sections of aluminum tubing. The ham radio magazines have lots of ads in the back from places that sell nesting aluminum tubing sections. I don't think there is any substantial electrical difference in copper vs aluminum oxidation. Play with EZNEC varying the conductivities and you'll find that the conductivity changes are in the noise. One important thread in these antenna designs, is not that they are numerically superior in performance to some other technique. It's that they're buildable by average hams using readily available materials. Tim. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
copper clad steel | Antenna | |||
Aluminum chassis & steel rivets = bad graound | Boatanchors | |||
Why is copper better than steel for wire antenna? | Antenna | |||
Steel to Copper | Antenna | |||
Still Looking for crankup/foldover steel or aluminum tower | Antenna |