Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a half-sloper attached to my tower. It is mostly used for 80 meters
(but also for 160 and 40 in rare cases). It is attached to the top of the middle section of a 55' crankup tower. The tower has a number coax and other control lines suspended a foot or so outside the tower. I am in the "far suburbs" but 40/80/160 still have more noise that I hoped and I suspect some of the noise is from the neighborhood; there is no specific noise generator that I can detect. Question: would a coax choke (5 43-material toroids with 5 loops of coax) at the feedpoint of the half-sloper do any good? I am a little confused since the tower (and, I assume, the outside of the coax) is an intentional part of a half-sloper antenna. At the bottom of the tower, the coax goes underground for about 50' to the rig. Bill - W2WO |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 16, 9:41*am, "Bill Ogden" wrote:
I am a little confused since the tower (and, I assume, the outside of the coax) is an intentional part of a half-sloper antenna. There are two sources of common-mode current. A choke at the resonant dipole feedpoint reduces the common-mode current conducted onto the outside coax braid. Unfortunately with the tower being a radiator and the coax tied to the tower, inducted common-mode is the major problem and difficult to solve. A choke at the antenna feedpoint will have little effect on inducted common-mode current. I wonder if you are frying any earthworms along your buried coax? :-) -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/16/2010 7:41 AM, Bill Ogden wrote:
I have a half-sloper attached to my tower. It is mostly used for 80 meters (but also for 160 and 40 in rare cases). It is attached to the top of the middle section of a 55' crankup tower. The tower has a number coax and other control lines suspended a foot or so outside the tower. I am in the "far suburbs" but 40/80/160 still have more noise that I hoped and I suspect some of the noise is from the neighborhood; there is no specific noise generator that I can detect. Question: would a coax choke (5 43-material toroids with 5 loops of coax) at the feedpoint of the half-sloper do any good? I am a little confused since the tower (and, I assume, the outside of the coax) is an intentional part of a half-sloper antenna. At the bottom of the tower, the coax goes underground for about 50' to the rig. Bill - W2WO You're correct that the feedline and/or tower are part of the antenna. What you have is a dipole (not necessarily symmetrical), with one side of the dipole being the half-sloper "antenna" and the other side being the tower and feedline. The feedline has two transmission line conductors, which are the center conductor and the inside of the shield. Whatever current flows out of one must flow into the other. The current going to the half sloper equals the current flowing down the tower and outside of the feedline shield. If you effectively choke the tower and feedline currents, you'll also choke the current to the half sloper. While you can effectively choke the current on the outside of the feedline (it would probably take two chokes, one at the top and one at the bottom), it won't help your noise situation. Whatever nearby vertically polarized noise might have been picked up by the outside of the coax will still be picked up by the tower. If the problem is vertically polarized local noise, the only solution is probably to go with a fully horizontal antenna with a well-decoupled feedline. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:41:32 -0400, "Bill Ogden"
wrote: the coax goes underground for about 50' to the rig. Hi Bill, That alone should snub common mode currents (into the shack). What kind of noise? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() You're correct that the feedline and/or tower are part of the antenna. What you have is a dipole (not necessarily symmetrical), with one side of the dipole being the half-sloper "antenna" and the other side being the tower and feedline. The feedline has two transmission line conductors, which are the center conductor and the inside of the shield. Whatever current flows out of one must flow into the other. The current going to the half sloper equals the current flowing down the tower and outside of the feedline shield. If you effectively choke the tower and feedline currents, you'll also choke the current to the half sloper. While you can effectively choke the current on the outside of the feedline (it would probably take two chokes, one at the top and one at the bottom), it won't help your noise situation. Whatever nearby vertically polarized noise might have been picked up by the outside of the coax will still be picked up by the tower. If the problem is vertically polarized local noise, the only solution is probably to go with a fully horizontal antenna with a well-decoupled feedline. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Thank you for the confirmation. I'll skip the choke for the half-sloper. I am aware that many hams take a poor view of these antennas. Perhaps I am a bit lucky because mine seems to meet my minimum requirements --- especially for transmitting --- probably because I do not use 80 or 160 very often. (I still need about 25 countries on 80 for 5BDXCC and this is my driver.) I would love to have a quieter receiving antenna for 80. There is a very interesting scheme in the QST I received today; in effect a rotary beam for 80, with variable angle of reception. Bill - W2WO |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/16/2010 7:41 AM, Bill Ogden wrote:
I have a half-sloper attached to my tower. It is mostly used for 80 meters (but also for 160 and 40 in rare cases). It is attached to the top of the middle section of a 55' crankup tower. The tower has a number coax and other control lines suspended a foot or so outside the tower. I am in the "far suburbs" but 40/80/160 still have more noise that I hoped and I suspect some of the noise is from the neighborhood; there is no specific noise generator that I can detect. Question: would a coax choke (5 43-material toroids with 5 loops of coax) at the feedpoint of the half-sloper do any good? I am a little confused since the tower (and, I assume, the outside of the coax) is an intentional part of a half-sloper antenna. At the bottom of the tower, the coax goes underground for about 50' to the rig. Bill - W2WO Might, actually, be better to feed the other end of the sloper, bringing that end as close to the shack as possible, shortening the coax and dropping out the associated loss, possibly having a favorable effect on your noise, etc. Of course the addition of a suitable counterpoise(s) would be necessary .... just a thought ... and, of course, a notable amount of work. Regards, JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Coax choke balun | Antenna | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Boatanchors | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment |