On 10/6/2010 12:24 PM, Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 04:31:55 -0700 (PDT), JIMMIE
wrote:

Obviously a reduction in IR losses will improve any antenna. Art how
much do you thing making an antenna out of silver instead of aluminum
would reduce the IR losses.

InfraRed loss in an antenna?

or perhaps:

I·R Voltage Loss in an antenna?

or perhaps:

I²·R Power Loss in an antenna?

**************

Yes, I²·R loss is the entire point (and positive characteristic) of an
antenna, especially if R is radiation resistance.

Hmmm, I·R loss could be said to be a naturally occurring fact of life
along the length of any antenna if we consider the distribution of
potential.

Ouch, InfraRed loss could burn you - but it would be curious to note
that if an antenna is truly an equal performer (transmit/receive) what
would we hear from the antenna when the sun rises in the morning?

As to the receive-mode phenomenon of this sunrise observation, if that
antenna were coated with diamagnetic water (dew), then we would
observe particles leaping (-um- steaming) off of it (with sizzle)!

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

What an idea! IR night vision could be used to tune antennas!

I redact my previous obfuscation against you Art. You are BRIALLAINT!

tom
K0TAR

On 10/6/2010 5:45 PM, tom wrote:

...
What an idea! IR night vision could be used to tune antennas!

I redact my previous obfuscation against you Art. You are BRIALLAINT!

tom
K0TAR

First consuming Ayawaska and then putting on a 3d pair of glasses
actually allows you to see the photons shooting out from the antenna. I
believe it is the "time dilation effect" from the Ayawaska which is
responsible for this, seemingly, "superman ability" occurring.

As always, first consult your local shaman or witchdoctor before taking
Ayawaska ...

Regards,
JS

"Richard Clark" wrote
...
Symmetrical back and forth take place only in the simple equations.
In EACH wave the forth is stronger than back.

The intellectual product of a Stalinist education system.

"It was shown by Stokes that in a water wave the particles of fluid possess,
apart from their orbital motion, a steady second-order drift velocity
(usually called the mass-transport velocity)."

In all schools the second-order effects are neglected.
In Stokes time no radio. But the above apply to all waves.

You should start with the selfeducation.
S*

"tom" wrote
. net...
On 10/6/2010 2:13 PM, Richard Clark wrote:
Symmetrical back and forth take place only in the simple equations.
In EACH wave the forth is stronger than back.

The intellectual product of a Stalinist education system.

Or the most lucid manifesto available from the Tea Party.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Ah, I almost forgot, it's electron time.

And the field emissions.

Could you please let it go just one electron season? It is boring and
repetitious crap and way beneath your normal responses.

Electrons, mass transport and the field emission are reality. EM is a myth.
S*

On 10/7/2010 1:05 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:

...
"It was shown by Stokes that in a water wave the particles of fluid possess,
apart from their orbital motion, a steady second-order drift velocity
(usually called the mass-transport velocity)."
...

Sounds like you are using a stream of salt water as a radiator! Is the
pump Bismuth coated to prevent corrosion?

Regards,
JS

On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:26:49 +0200, "Szczepan Bialek"
wrote:
"tom" wrote
Ah, I almost forgot, it's electron time.

Evidence of the revisionist Stalinist influence.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"Richard Clark" wrote
...
Symmetrical back and forth take place only in the simple equations.
In EACH wave the forth is stronger than back.

The intellectual product of a Stalinist education system.

"It was shown by Stokes that in a water wave the particles of fluid possess,
apart from their orbital motion, a steady second-order drift velocity
(usually called the mass-transport velocity)."

In all schools the second-order effects are neglected.
In Stokes time no radio. But the above apply to all waves.

You should start with the selfeducation.
S*

Babbling, kook word salad.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:05:40 +0200, "Szczepan Bialek"
wrote:

In all schools the second-order effects are neglected.

Rabble of the lumpenproletariat. Continuing to wander in the fog is a
sure sign of never achieving class consciousness, and is therefore
worthless in the context of revolutionary struggle.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Since the conductivity of aluminum is about 43 times higher than that of
bisimuth, I think you are babbling.

You meant I could use the aluminum window frames as a big antenna?

--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.35.7
^ ^ 00:36:01 up 8 days 1:53 1 user load average: 0.00 0.11 0.08
�借貸! ��騙! ��交! �打交! �打劫! �自殺! 請考慮綜� (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa

"John Smith" wrote
...
On 10/7/2010 1:05 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:

...
"It was shown by Stokes that in a water wave the particles of fluid
possess,
apart from their orbital motion, a steady second-order drift velocity
(usually called the mass-transport velocity)."
...

Sounds like you are using a stream of salt water as a radiator! Is the
pump Bismuth coated to prevent corrosion?

In each radiator is a stream of electrons. The oscillating pump is in the
transmitter. But where is the tank with the electrons?

It is in the buried or elevated radials. R. Roy wrote: "If the earth was a
perfect conductor then those currents could travel
through the earth without loss, and a single, short ground rod would
serve as an electrical reference point for the r-f current flowing in
the antenna system. The sum of those r-f currents flowing in the
earth around the monopole, and collected by that ground rod will be
equal to the base current in the 1/4-wave, series-fed monopole"

The soil is different in each place. The air is similar. So the elevated
radials are universal. They catch the electrons from the air.
S*