Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seems like everyone I talk to about using ladder line to my
proposed 540' horizontal skywire loop does a double take when I say I want to use ladder line into the shack. I was curious if there are any fans of ladderline feed systems who can relate positive experiences, or am I about to really court disaster here. The ARRL antenna book says that coax to this type of antenna is not as "multiband" friendly as was once fantasized....they recommend ladder line. Anyone actually have such a loop? What is your experience? Bill, K6TAJ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/notuner.htm
"zeno" wrote in message ... Seems like everyone I talk to about using ladder line to my proposed 540' horizontal skywire loop does a double take when I say I want to use ladder line into the shack. I was curious if there are any fans of ladderline feed systems who can relate positive experiences, or am I about to really court disaster here. The ARRL antenna book says that coax to this type of antenna is not as "multiband" friendly as was once fantasized....they recommend ladder line. Anyone actually have such a loop? What is your experience? Bill, K6TAJ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "Peter" == Uncle Peter Uncle writes: Peter http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/notuner.htm That is the cleverest thing I've seen today. Wow. Very nifty. My only concern when constructing something like that is how to store the longer lengths (eight and sixteen) of ladder line -- can they be coiled up? If so, it's less unwieldy and can scale even higher. Of course, those hams who know binary arithmetic will luck out here. Jack. - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAjFdMGPFSfAB/ezgRArzcAJ42I07VGe2bpeKCs9sdN9V2jNfpDgCdGLPL Yul13ErgNKsQLK1xE4fxco8= =KS37 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "zeno" wrote in message ... Seems like everyone I talk to about using ladder line to my proposed 540' horizontal skywire loop does a double take when I say I want to use ladder line into the shack. I was curious if there are any fans of ladderline feed systems who can relate positive experiences, or am I about to really court disaster here. The ARRL antenna book says that coax to this type of antenna is not as "multiband" friendly as was once fantasized....they recommend ladder line. Anyone actually have such a loop? What is your experience? Bill, K6TAJ I use 450 ohm ladder line on two seperate antennas here. One is a full sized 40 meter loop, in right triangle configuration, vertical. I run the line straight into the shack and into a EF Johnson Matchbox. Works all bands 40 thr 10 just fine. I run 600 watts into it, and no problems. No TVI, No computer faults, no telephone problems. On the other antenna I have a 140 CF doublet with 450 Ladder Line feed. This into a Heathkit SA-2040 tuner. Same same as above. The reason I am able to run the LL into the shack is that I have a large out building that I have the shack in. Run it right through, not a problem. Just keep the line away from conductive objects and I run it up to my ceiling then out. Dan/W4NTI |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... "zeno" wrote in message ... Seems like everyone I talk to about using ladder line to my proposed 540' horizontal skywire loop does a double take when I say I want to use ladder line into the shack. I was curious if there are any fans of ladderline feed systems who can relate positive experiences, or am I about to really court disaster here. The ARRL antenna book says that coax to this type of antenna is not as "multiband" friendly as was once fantasized....they recommend ladder line. Anyone actually have such a loop? What is your experience? Bill, K6TAJ I use 450 ohm ladder line on two seperate antennas here. One is a full sized 40 meter loop, in right triangle configuration, vertical. I run the line straight into the shack and into a EF Johnson Matchbox. Works all bands 40 thr 10 just fine. I run 600 watts into it, and no problems. No TVI, No computer faults, no telephone problems. On the other antenna I have a 140 CF doublet with 450 Ladder Line feed. This into a Heathkit SA-2040 tuner. Same same as above. The reason I am able to run the LL into the shack is that I have a large out building that I have the shack in. Run it right through, not a problem. Just keep the line away from conductive objects and I run it up to my ceiling then out. Dan/W4NTI slightly off topic.... Hi Dan, What kind of lightning protection do you employ for straight ladderline? What are the options (besides tossing it out the window) - if you aren't using any? I don't run any feeds through my windows, so I wondered what options that left for ladderline, etc. Thanks Jack Virginia Beach |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:37:53 -0400, "Jack Painter"
wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net... "zeno" wrote in message ... Seems like everyone I talk to about using ladder line to my proposed 540' horizontal skywire loop does a double take when I say I want to use ladder line into the shack. I was curious if there are any fans of ladderline feed systems who can relate positive experiences, or am I about to really court disaster here. The ARRL antenna book says that coax to this type of antenna is not as "multiband" friendly as was once fantasized....they recommend ladder line. Anyone actually have such a loop? What is your experience? Bill, K6TAJ I use 450 ohm ladder line on two seperate antennas here. One is a full sized 40 meter loop, in right triangle configuration, vertical. I run the line straight into the shack and into a EF Johnson Matchbox. Works all bands 40 thr 10 just fine. I run 600 watts into it, and no problems. No TVI, No computer faults, no telephone problems. On the other antenna I have a 140 CF doublet with 450 Ladder Line feed. This into a Heathkit SA-2040 tuner. Same same as above. The reason I am able to run the LL into the shack is that I have a large out building that I have the shack in. Run it right through, not a problem. Just keep the line away from conductive objects and I run it up to my ceiling then out. Dan/W4NTI slightly off topic.... Hi Dan, What kind of lightning protection do you employ for straight ladderline? What are the options (besides tossing it out the window) - if you aren't using any? I don't run any feeds through my windows, so I wondered what options that left for ladderline, etc. I've found the easiest thing is to insert banana jacks/plugs in the ladderline just outside the window. When the clouds come, I simply unplug. The Wireman sells a balanced-line lightning arrester built around a couple of spark plugs, but I'm not sure how well it works. Bob k5qwg Thanks Jack Virginia Beach |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack Painter" wrote in message news:SJZic.41278$fq4.23897@lakeread05... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... "zeno" wrote in message ... Seems like everyone I talk to about using ladder line to my proposed 540' horizontal skywire loop does a double take when I say I want to use ladder line into the shack. I was curious if there are any fans of ladderline feed systems who can relate positive experiences, or am I about to really court disaster here. The ARRL antenna book says that coax to this type of antenna is not as "multiband" friendly as was once fantasized....they recommend ladder line. Anyone actually have such a loop? What is your experience? Bill, K6TAJ I use 450 ohm ladder line on two seperate antennas here. One is a full sized 40 meter loop, in right triangle configuration, vertical. I run the line straight into the shack and into a EF Johnson Matchbox. Works all bands 40 thr 10 just fine. I run 600 watts into it, and no problems. No TVI, No computer faults, no telephone problems. On the other antenna I have a 140 CF doublet with 450 Ladder Line feed. This into a Heathkit SA-2040 tuner. Same same as above. The reason I am able to run the LL into the shack is that I have a large out building that I have the shack in. Run it right through, not a problem. Just keep the line away from conductive objects and I run it up to my ceiling then out. Dan/W4NTI slightly off topic.... Hi Dan, What kind of lightning protection do you employ for straight ladderline? What are the options (besides tossing it out the window) - if you aren't using any? I don't run any feeds through my windows, so I wondered what options that left for ladderline, etc. Thanks Jack Virginia Beach I don't have any lightning protection on them at this point. I normally disconnect things when I leave the 'shack' anyway. However back in the old days the use of spark gaps were common for open wire line. Get some of the real Old Timers here to talk about that one. Dan/W4NTI |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
With general purpose, multi-band antennas such as yours, taking one band
with another, the higher the feedline impedance the less the loss in the feedline. This is because feedline attenuation in dB is directly proportional to R/Zo where R is the resistance of the feedline conductors and Zo is the line impedance. This simple relationship applies from 50-ohm coax (or lower) up to 600-ohm (or more) wide-spaced open-wire line. Ordinary 50-ohm coax is fine ONLY when the input impedance of the antenna is itself approximately 50 ohms purely resistive and the line length is not very long. But with multi-band antennas Zin is most unlikely to be anywhere near 50-ohms on any band. It is more likely, taking one band with another, to be several hundred ohms or even 1000 ohms with a high reactance component. Assuming the conductor resistance to be of the same order for both coax and balanced-pair lines of the same length, line loss will be appreciably less for the higher impedance lines. In fact, for the physical sizes usually involved, spaced balanced wires have a lower conductor resistance than ordinary coax and this swings the use of spaced lines further in their favour. Even a 300-ohm twin line with substantial conductors, not the flimsy old TV downlead type, will effect an improvement over the usual sort of coax. 450-ohm ladder line is most popular because of cheapness and relative ease of installation. But for perfectionists, on very long lines, a 5" or 6" spaced 600-ohm work-of-art cannot be bettered. With low-loss, high-Zo lines SWR on the line can usually be forgotten about. But a high SWR can make severe demands on the tuner however. Transmission line Zo, of course, is unrelated to antenna efficiency which with a high antenna is nearly always good enough to be considered 100%. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Reg Edwards wrote: Even a 300-ohm twin line with substantial conductors, not the flimsy old TV downlead type, will effect an improvement over the usual sort of coax. 450-ohm ladder line is most popular because of cheapness and relative ease of installation. But for perfectionists, on very long lines, a 5" or 6" spaced 600-ohm work-of-art cannot be bettered. any reason that silicon sealant would not be as good as anything else when fixing (gluing) the wires to the slotted holes of the spacers in a homebrew ladder line? Any reason why this same substance would not be appropriate to seal up the ceramic tubes where such lines go through a wall? this stuff is tough, weather resistant, sticks, and stays flexible. Bill, K6TAJ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The electrical properties of sealing materials and greases are not defined
or specified. They probably make poor dielectrics when surrounding or are in between transmission line conductors. I wouldn't use the stuff. A few spots of super-glue would be ok. There's no need to run open-wire line through walls and windows via two spaced holes. The building material between the wires will probably be of awful dielectric quality anyway. Just bring the pair of insulated wires close together for a short distance and run them through a single somewhat larger hole lined with a short, pvc or polythene tube. Slope the tube and the line to prevent rainwater from running indoors. When coming through glass or DRY varnished timber a single hole is fine. On high power lines make sure the insulation on the wires where they are close together is thick enough to withstand the high voltage at high SWR. At HF, the discontinuity in Zo due to bringing the wires close together for a few inches, even a foot or more, is absolutely negligeable. And there's nothing wrong with changing from a long open-wire line (outdoors) to a short ladder line to the transmitter (indoors). Use a simple choke balun between the transmitter end of balanced lines and the tuner. The luxury of a balanced tuner is unnecessary. ---- Reg, G4FGQ ==================================== Reg Edwards wrote: Even a 300-ohm twin line with substantial conductors, not the flimsy old TV downlead type, will effect an improvement over the usual sort of coax. 450-ohm ladder line is most popular because of cheapness and relative ease of installation. But for perfectionists, on very long lines, a 5" or 6" spaced 600-ohm work-of-art cannot be bettered. any reason that silicon sealant would not be as good as anything else when fixing (gluing) the wires to the slotted holes of the spacers in a homebrew ladder line? Any reason why this same substance would not be appropriate to seal up the ceramic tubes where such lines go through a wall? this stuff is tough, weather resistant, sticks, and stays flexible. Bill, K6TAJ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Delay is it real??? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |