Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's a little ironic that you're trying to save a penny or two on your
design and think that bitching about free advice is somehow going to help you achieve that goal... Look, call up a dozen or so vendors and get some price quotes -- it'll give you some idea of what a 'reasonable' price should be. Figure out what you can charge for your product... if there's enough money left for you to make profit, just go for it and leave the rest of your learning/profit maximization until you actually have an income stream and some track record of the difficulties in building your products. Anyone worrying about $.01/sq. in. either has such a huge volume that they should be able to afford an expect to get the best prices and redesign the product (this oftens makes a huge difference!) specifically to be easy to manufacture or else is probably never going to get their product out the door in the first place. I've seen many people who seemed to have viable product ideas never get anywhere because they spent far too much time worrying about how to squeeze the last penny out of manufacturing costs and ran out of enthusiasm to simply design and document the product properly. ---Joel Kolstad Finally a thoughtful response. BTW I have called up the vendors, that's just common sense, but the prices they quote are rediculous even if you promise them volume. They don't believe you about the volume (rightfully so, that's why I am asking someone who has the volume) and at those prices there is no business. I have done all that analysis. Yes, I am worried about $.01/sq in. That's a buck on a 100 sq in board. That's A LOT of money to me. BTW, I have done as much antenna footprint minimization as possible (that's a different topic). Now to your point about never getting anywhere due to too much time squeezing out pennies. I have experienced a lot more of the opposite, where people build stuff without paying enough attention to the costs and then figure out that its too expensive and try to cost reduce. At that point their previous decisions limit their options and the stuff can never be built cheap enough. So I am trying to strike a balance. And if I can get a quick answer on what those costs are, that would leave me more time to optimize the design. BTW I am NOT asking who you are, I am just asking how much you pay. That's the beauty of these boards. I don't see the foul. ps Free advice is the goal of these boards, I am not bitching about the advice, I am bitching about lack thereof. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() basketball_jones wrote: It's a little ironic that you're trying to save a penny or two on your design and think that bitching about free advice is somehow going to help you achieve that goal... Look, call up a dozen or so vendors and get some price quotes -- it'll give you some idea of what a 'reasonable' price should be. Figure out what you can charge for your product... if there's enough money left for you to make profit, just go for it and leave the rest of your learning/profit maximization until you actually have an income stream and some track record of the difficulties in building your products. Anyone worrying about $.01/sq. in. either has such a huge volume that they should be able to afford an expect to get the best prices and redesign the product (this oftens makes a huge difference!) specifically to be easy to manufacture or else is probably never going to get their product out the door in the first place. I've seen many people who seemed to have viable product ideas never get anywhere because they spent far too much time worrying about how to squeeze the last penny out of manufacturing costs and ran out of enthusiasm to simply design and document the product properly. ---Joel Kolstad Finally a thoughtful response. BTW I have called up the vendors, that's just common sense, but the prices they quote are rediculous even if you promise them volume. They don't believe you about the volume (rightfully so, that's why I am asking someone who has the volume) and at those prices there is no business. I have done all that analysis. Yes, I am worried about $.01/sq in. That's a buck on a 100 sq in board. That's A LOT of money to me. BTW, I have done as much antenna footprint minimization as possible (that's a different topic). Now to your point about never getting anywhere due to too much time squeezing out pennies. I have experienced a lot more of the opposite, where people build stuff without paying enough attention to the costs and then figure out that its too expensive and try to cost reduce. At that point their previous decisions limit their options and the stuff can never be built cheap enough. So I am trying to strike a balance. And if I can get a quick answer on what those costs are, that would leave me more time to optimize the design. BTW I am NOT asking who you are, I am just asking how much you pay. That's the beauty of these boards. I don't see the foul. ps Free advice is the goal of these boards, I am not bitching about the advice, I am bitching about lack thereof. I gotta think you must be taking the wrong approach with these PC houses if you can't get an answer from them. Besides, the answers you get from us don't amount to much if you can't get anybody to make your boards for the prices "quoted" here. Bottom line is you won't get the low digit price unless you're going to spend some big money. If you let the PC houses know how big a project you have, and it's big, then they'll be plenty anxious to quote you a good price. 73, Jim AC6XG |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote in message ...
basketball_jones wrote: It's a little ironic that you're trying to save a penny or two on your design and think that bitching about free advice is somehow going to help you achieve that goal... Look, call up a dozen or so vendors and get some price quotes -- it'll give you some idea of what a 'reasonable' price should be. Figure out what you can charge for your product... if there's enough money left for you to make profit, just go for it and leave the rest of your learning/profit maximization until you actually have an income stream and some track record of the difficulties in building your products. Anyone worrying about $.01/sq. in. either has such a huge volume that they should be able to afford an expect to get the best prices and redesign the product (this oftens makes a huge difference!) specifically to be easy to manufacture or else is probably never going to get their product out the door in the first place. I've seen many people who seemed to have viable product ideas never get anywhere because they spent far too much time worrying about how to squeeze the last penny out of manufacturing costs and ran out of enthusiasm to simply design and document the product properly. ---Joel Kolstad Finally a thoughtful response. BTW I have called up the vendors, that's just common sense, but the prices they quote are rediculous even if you promise them volume. They don't believe you about the volume (rightfully so, that's why I am asking someone who has the volume) and at those prices there is no business. I have done all that analysis. Yes, I am worried about $.01/sq in. That's a buck on a 100 sq in board. That's A LOT of money to me. BTW, I have done as much antenna footprint minimization as possible (that's a different topic). Now to your point about never getting anywhere due to too much time squeezing out pennies. I have experienced a lot more of the opposite, where people build stuff without paying enough attention to the costs and then figure out that its too expensive and try to cost reduce. At that point their previous decisions limit their options and the stuff can never be built cheap enough. So I am trying to strike a balance. And if I can get a quick answer on what those costs are, that would leave me more time to optimize the design. BTW I am NOT asking who you are, I am just asking how much you pay. That's the beauty of these boards. I don't see the foul. ps Free advice is the goal of these boards, I am not bitching about the advice, I am bitching about lack thereof. I gotta think you must be taking the wrong approach with these PC houses if you can't get an answer from them. Besides, the answers you get from us don't amount to much if you can't get anybody to make your boards for the prices "quoted" here. Bottom line is you won't get the low digit price unless you're going to spend some big money. If you let the PC houses know how big a project you have, and it's big, then they'll be plenty anxious to quote you a good price. 73, Jim AC6XG Folks we are missing the point here. I can certainly get a quote from them. You can safely assume I already have it. Ok, that tells me the MOST I am going to pay. Now I want the LEAST I can possibly pay. The only way for me to get that is to go through board manufacturers' cost structure and assume their take. I am not TI or HP, I don't have the resources to do that, and even if I did I wouldn't get it right. Now why would I want to know the LEAST even though I can't get that price at this point. Well, the situation is likely that if I have to pay the MOST, I lose money. Do I still lose money when I get to pay the LEAST? (As far as getting the houses to quote a big project) I can't get the big project funded, much less quoted until I understand that. Look people. Determining the 'right' price is one of the 'killer aps' of the internet. Use it. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() basketball_jones wrote: Do I still lose money when I get to pay the LEAST? I think what you need is a book on the business of manufacturing. The price is basically going to fit a line y = mx + b. Think of b as a tooling charge. The unit cost is m. x is the number of units, and y is what you pay per lot. 73, Jim AC6XG |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTW You have NOT answered one question I asked so far. It would be
helpful if you either answered the questions or stopped wasting my time. You, my friend are the one that's playing games. Please Kevin, Don't be so righteous. I told you what to do on a private e-mail, way before you sent this. If you couldn't get pricing from the reps--REAL pricing--then I would provide it. I, too, have priced out boards for microwave apps, and I certainly didn't need to go around the reps. We need to keep a viable substrate industry continuing in this country, and anything that could be construed as undermining them is not in my vocabulary. They've bled way too much already. 73, Chip N1IR |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote in message ...
basketball_jones wrote: Do I still lose money when I get to pay the LEAST? I think what you need is a book on the business of manufacturing. The price is basically going to fit a line y = mx + b. Think of b as a tooling charge. The unit cost is m. x is the number of units, and y is what you pay per lot. 73, Jim AC6XG Excellent, thanks, now, what is the rough equation for 'm' vs volume for PCBs? |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
basketball_jones wrote:
Excellent, thanks, now, what is the rough equation for 'm' vs volume for PCBs? To first order, it's a constant which is proportional to the size of your PC board. 73, AC6XG |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
basketball_jones wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote in message ... basketball_jones wrote: Do I still lose money when I get to pay the LEAST? I think what you need is a book on the business of manufacturing. The price is basically going to fit a line y = mx + b. Think of b as a tooling charge. The unit cost is m. x is the number of units, and y is what you pay per lot. 73, Jim AC6XG Excellent, thanks, now, what is the rough equation for 'm' vs volume for PCBs? I hope you are kidding !!!! Contact the vendors and get a price schedule showing price breaks as a function of layers, area and quantity of boards. Do you want finished boards, or will you cut boards from a master sheet, etc.? What level of quality control is required? If you are selling into the NASA or Military market there are VERY SIGNIFICANT documentation, traceability requirements, and QC requirements and certifications required. Even to controlling the exact chemistry of the board material. Depending on your customer your unit material cost may be buried in recurring paper costs. I'm an expert in this area {Program Chief Engineer, USAF WS-118, RS/RV ... MX Missile] |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
basketball_jones wrote:
Folks we are missing the point here. I can certainly get a quote from them. You can safely assume I already have it. Ok, that tells me the MOST I am going to pay. Now I want the LEAST I can possibly pay. In many companies that are large enough to have the kind of volumes you seem to be after, I suspect that purchasing is done by, uh, the purchasing department and not the design engineer and said purchasing folks are probably rather unlikely to be reading this newsgroup. :-) Although I'd grant you this is about the best place to ask that I could think of... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|