Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have always been of the opinion that when it comes to wire antennas, the
prevailing rule of thumb is "the higher the better". However, I am about to deploy a 270' 160m antenna, and -- based on available trees -- I can either install an inverted vee with a 50 foot apex, along a straight vertical plane, with ends dropping off to about 15 feet high; or a dipole at 50 feet, with the antenna in a straight horizontal plane (center and ends at 50 feet), but the vertical plane in a V beam configuration of about 90 degrees. I enjoy chasing DX - so which configuration should I choose? Would the slight vertical component of the inverted vee offer me a better take-off angle than the horizontal dipole? Or should I opt for the "higher the better" route? Thanks in advance for your responses, -larry K8UT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The effective height of an inverted vee is approximately 80% of its
apex height - depending upon the angle. However at 50 foot height above ground ether configuration (the dipole or inverted vee) will be a NVIS antenna system on 160 meters. If you are seeking low takeoff angles for DX you would be better off using an L. 73 Danny, K6MHE On Wed, 5 May 2004 10:47:24 -0400, "Larry Gauthier \(K8UT\)" wrote: I have always been of the opinion that when it comes to wire antennas, the prevailing rule of thumb is "the higher the better". However, I am about to deploy a 270' 160m antenna, and -- based on available trees -- I can either install an inverted vee with a 50 foot apex, along a straight vertical plane, with ends dropping off to about 15 feet high; or a dipole at 50 feet, with the antenna in a straight horizontal plane (center and ends at 50 feet), but the vertical plane in a V beam configuration of about 90 degrees. I enjoy chasing DX - so which configuration should I choose? Would the slight vertical component of the inverted vee offer me a better take-off angle than the horizontal dipole? Or should I opt for the "higher the better" route? Thanks in advance for your responses, -larry K8UT |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry,
At 50 feet, the differences between the two antennas are going to be negligible. Put up whichever will be easiest for you. 'Doc |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |