Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all
I have an odd situation with a Solarcon Ground Zero antenna operating on 10m. I am short of space, and dont have room to erect a traditional silver rod type vertical, or anything with a large radial system, so I cast around for something that would fit the bill and go on my existing mast. I came up with this Solarcon antenna. It is a continuously loaded - ie helically wound - monopole, about 4 feet long. It claims to be a groundplane-less electrical half wave, with voltage feed at the base, via what they call their patented " sidekicker unit ", which appears to be some kind of clamp mounted ferrite balun. It is able to be moved up and down a small section of the antenna to facilitate VSWR adjustment. It claims to be ok for use on fibreglass truck cabs etc, and does not require a conducting mount. I only wanted it for fairly short range local FM chit chat at 29Megs, and access to my local 10m repeater about 6 miles away. So far, so good. Initial trials were carried out indoors, with the antenna fixed in a chemistry clampstand, about a foot above a bench, and fed with about 10 feet of coax. The VSWR set up PERFECTLY at 29.5MHz, and a 2:1 VSWR was maintained over a couple hundred kHz. The repeater could be accessed with only a few watts, and a good signal was received from it. I then mounted the antenna at the end of a 4 foot 1.5 inch diameter duralumin pole, and clamped this to my main 2.5 inch diameter station mast, at a height of about 4 feet above ground, and ran the full final length of coax back to the transmitter. I then carried out some final VSWR tweaks and repeated the tests with the repeater. Again, results were good. I also ran some simplex tests with a friend located near the repeater receive site, and again, results were good. I then moved the antenna up the mast to what I hoped would be its final installation position at around 15 feet above ground - and here's where it all went wrong. A recheck of the VSWR at this point revealed that it had not changed, so the antenna was not being detuned in any way. However, the performance was now absolute crap. I needed over 20 watts to access the repeater, and the returned signal was 5 S points down. My friend could no longer pull me out of the noise below 5 watts. Several hours of tests then followed, and the upshot of these was that the lower I brought the antenna, the better it worked. I am now at a total loss to explain this. As an electrical half wave, the antenna should not require a ground system to work against, and this would seem to be the case, as it tunes up so well. I thought maybe the radiation angle was rather high, although again, it shouldn't be for a half wave. If it were, maybe the ground was having an effect on this, and pulling the radiation angle down. I'm loathe to believe this though, as the antenna is originally designed as a groundplane-less type for CB use, and this is primarily a short range band requiring a good ground wave. Does anyone have any thoughts on what is going on here, and whether anything can be done to improve the situation? I have also considered using a Boomerang instead, as this can be centre mounted and is designed to work stood off from a pole similar to my situation.Again, any thoughts ? I would appreciate any replies direct to Thanks Geoff G7RTC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
the upshot of these was that the lower
I brought the antenna, the better it worked. If you're getting the coverage you want at only 4 ft up, why not just leave it there? jw K9RZZ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , J999w
writes the upshot of these was that the lower I brought the antenna, the better it worked. If you're getting the coverage you want at only 4 ft up, why not just leave it there? jw K9RZZ A REAL radio amateur is NEVER satisfied with the coverage or signal strength! However, the lack of signal strength in the elevated location could be because of multipath reflections, and the antenna is now in a null wrt the repeater antenna (this can happen on 10m). Well, maybe..... Ian. -- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geof,
All antennas are affected by 'ground', real (dirt), or the artificial kind (radials/counterpoise/??), not to mention everything around it. That's why you 'tune' one, right? I'm not familiar with the particular antenna you speak of, but I see no reason why it should be different. 'Doc |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arfa Daily wrote:
Does anyone have any thoughts on what is going on here, and whether anything can be done to improve the situation? I have also considered using a Boomerang instead, as this can be centre mounted and is designed to work stood off from a pole similar to my situation.Again, any thoughts ? Offhand, it would seem feedline radiation is ruining the pattern. Skews the pattern up off the horizon. Not that your coax length is nearly a 1/2 wave now. It's probably acting as part of the antenna. Try a choke, ferrite beads, etc, below the feedpoint. MK -- http://web.wt.net/~nm5k |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arfa Daily" wrote in message 2.203... Hi all I have an odd situation with a Solarcon Ground Zero antenna operating on 10m. I am short of space, and dont have room to erect a traditional silver rod type vertical, or anything with a large radial system, so I cast around for something that would fit the bill and go on my existing mast. I came up with this Solarcon antenna. It is a continuously loaded - ie helically wound - monopole, about 4 feet long. It claims to be a groundplane-less electrical half wave, with voltage feed at the base, via what they call their patented " sidekicker unit ", which appears to be some kind of clamp mounted ferrite balun. It is able to be moved up and down a small section of the antenna to facilitate VSWR adjustment. It claims to be ok for use on fibreglass truck cabs etc, and does not require a conducting mount. I only wanted it for fairly short range local FM chit chat at 29Megs, and access to my local 10m repeater about 6 miles away. So far, so good. Initial trials were carried out indoors, with the antenna fixed in a chemistry clampstand, about a foot above a bench, and fed with about 10 feet of coax. The VSWR set up PERFECTLY at 29.5MHz, and a 2:1 VSWR was maintained over a couple hundred kHz. The repeater could be accessed with only a few watts, and a good signal was received from it. I then mounted the antenna at the end of a 4 foot 1.5 inch diameter duralumin pole, and clamped this to my main 2.5 inch diameter station mast, at a height of about 4 feet above ground, and ran the full final length of coax back to the transmitter. I then carried out some final VSWR tweaks and repeated the tests with the repeater. Again, results were good. I also ran some simplex tests with a friend located near the repeater receive site, and again, results were good. I then moved the antenna up the mast to what I hoped would be its final installation position at around 15 feet above ground - and here's where it all went wrong. A recheck of the VSWR at this point revealed that it had not changed, so the antenna was not being detuned in any way. However, the performance was now absolute crap. I needed over 20 watts to access the repeater, and the returned signal was 5 S points down. My friend could no longer pull me out of the noise below 5 watts. Several hours of tests then followed, and the upshot of these was that the lower I brought the antenna, the better it worked. I am now at a total loss to explain this. As an electrical half wave, the antenna should not require a ground system to work against, and this would seem to be the case, as it tunes up so well. I thought maybe the radiation angle was rather high, although again, it shouldn't be for a half wave. If it were, maybe the ground was having an effect on this, and pulling the radiation angle down. I'm loathe to believe this though, as the antenna is originally designed as a groundplane-less type for CB use, and this is primarily a short range band requiring a good ground wave. Does anyone have any thoughts on what is going on here, and whether anything can be done to improve the situation? I have also considered using a Boomerang instead, as this can be centre mounted and is designed to work stood off from a pole similar to my situation.Again, any thoughts ? I would appreciate any replies direct to Thanks Geoff G7RTC I would try to get the antenna up even higher and see what happens. You could be in a bad spot for quite a few different reasons. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
HF Vertical design(s) | Antenna | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna |