Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 9th 04, 10:22 PM
David Browne
 
Posts: n/a
Default inverted L or 1/2 size g5rv

hi, what would work best a, 54.45 feet,with a MHz trap,inverted L, up about
25-30feet above ground,with no radials ,just the ground,ps, i live in the uk
with good soil, or a 1/2 size g5rv up 25-30 feet high
thanks Dave Browne


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.701 / Virus Database: 458 - Release Date: 07/06/2004


  #2   Report Post  
Old June 10th 04, 02:27 AM
K9SQG
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In this particular case, the G5RV might be a better choice. In many other
instances other antennas will far out perform the G5RV and be easier to match
across all bands without being picky on some bands like the G5RV is. You'll
have fun in either case.

73s,

Evan
  #3   Report Post  
Old June 10th 04, 03:55 PM
K7MEM
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David Browne wrote:
hi, what would work best a, 54.45 feet,with a MHz trap,inverted L, up about
25-30feet above ground,with no radials ,just the ground,ps, i live in the uk
with good soil, or a 1/2 size g5rv up 25-30 feet high
thanks Dave Browne


In your situation I think you would be better off with the g5rv. With a
good tuner you should be able to run on all the HF bands.

I have found, in the past, that a inverted L doesn't work very well
without ground radials. I experimented with one that was fed at ground
level, traveled up for 25 feet, headed east to a tree branch, and then
south to another tree branch. Total length was about 96 feet. I first
tried to run with only a ground rod but couldn't get a stable match.
Then I started to add ground radials. They were just random lengths of
wire, around 25 feet long, buried about 1 or 2 inched in the ground. As
I added radials the matching became more stable and at around 5 radials
everything matched up great and the antenna worked great.

I live in the desert so my ground conditions are different than yours,
but you still may need the radials.

Martin

--
Martin E. Meserve

http://www.k7mem.150m.com

  #4   Report Post  
Old June 10th 04, 06:13 PM
JT1uk
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When I recently started out on HF these two antennas seemed to be obvious
canditates given the dimensions of my rear garden. I started out with an L of
similar dimensions to those quoted by the OP, and later tried a doublet (close
to half G5RV ) with an open wire feeder which ran rings around the L.
Not a fair comparison by any means outside the context of my garden and given
that the radial system for the L was 4 wires on the ground no more than 25 feet
in length.
My next step is to try a doublet of twice the length with the excess wire at
each end being guyed in various directions as necessary .
Have any of you experience of this and particularly of optimising what will
probably be an assymetric assymetric antenna?

John
M1JTA
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 11:22 PM
G5RV or 135 foot doublet or Carolina Windom? Jim Leder Antenna 3 May 22nd 04 04:43 PM
grounding half size g5rv David Browne Antenna 1 April 18th 04 08:08 PM
Stupid question G5RV Ken Bessler Antenna 17 January 9th 04 01:06 PM
G5RV 450 ohm or 300 ohm Phasing line Andy Antenna 2 August 15th 03 03:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017