Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Perhaps I might be of assistance by providing some orders of magnitude. A 1/2-wave stub line, 1 metre (39.37 inches) long constructed of a pair of polished copper tubes, each 1/2-inch in diameter, centers spaced 3 inches apart, at 150 MHz (not very far from 2 meters) has the following characteristics - Zo = 299.8 ohms. Attenuation = 0.0024 dB. As a tuned circuit, Resonant Q = 5800. When short-circuited - Parallel input components of Zin - Rsc = 0.08 ohms, Xsc = -j*582 ohms. When open circuited - Series input components of Zin - Roc = 1.11 megohms, Xoc = j*38.6 ohms. These and many other interesting values can be very accurately and rapidly calculated, from 20 Hz to 1 GHz, by using program RJELINE2 available, free issue, from website below. Contributors to this newsgroup, who by no means are lacking in intelligence, may then be able to get their feet on the ground. ----- .................................................. .......... Regards from Reg, G4FGQ For Free Radio Design Software go to http://www.btinternet.com/~g4fgq.regp .................................................. .......... |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 08:35:42 +0100, "Ian White, G3SEK"
wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: I'd also like to add that the induced current isn't unpredictable, as you stated. It has to follow rules like all other physical phenomena, so it's entirely predictable. Remainder deleted Three questions emerge from my foggy brain wrt to a current project. 1. What sort of choke loading on a feed line would be most effective at 70 cm, ferrite or coil wound from coax. 2. Could ferrite loading at a feed point take the place of say a 1/4 wave sleeve balun matching the unbalanced coax feed to a centre-fed dipole element. 3. What grade of ferrite bead would best be useful at 70cm. Thanks in advance. MikeN ZL1BNB |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MikeN wrote:
Three questions emerge from my foggy brain wrt to a current project. 1. What sort of choke loading on a feed line would be most effective at 70 cm, ferrite or coil wound from coax. Probably equally effective, although it might be tricky to get a coax coil to resonate at 70 cm, while a ferrite core choke, which is inherently broadband, would be easy. 2. Could ferrite loading at a feed point take the place of say a 1/4 wave sleeve balun matching the unbalanced coax feed to a centre-fed dipole element. Yes. A properly constructed sleeve balun can be made to have higher impedance, but in the application you describe, a ferrite core choke would be perfectly adequate. 3. What grade of ferrite bead would best be useful at 70cm. I'd probably use type 43. That's a Fair-Rite designation, but ferrites from other vendors with initial permeability of 700-800 or so would work equally well. Cores from that material are readily available in a wide variety of shapes and sizes. Some of the 60 series ferrites would also probably be adequate at that frequency. I suggest you visit the Fair-Rite website and take a look at the impedances of various cores at the frequency of interest, and choose ones that get you the impedance you need. (Unless you're running a lot of power, you don't need to worry about whether the impedance is resistive or reactive -- just look at its magnitude.) You can place cores on the outside of the coax and get an imedance that's the product of the number of cores and the impedance of one core. Or you can wind the coax in multiple turns on a single core and get N^2 times the single turn impedance, where N is the number of turns. 500 - 1000 ohms or so of impedance is adequate for most applications. If you have an antenna analyzer that operates at that frequency, you can measure it. Otherwise, just go by the manufacturer's stated value of impedance at the frequency of interest. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Physical size of radiating element? | Antenna | |||
FS, Book, 'Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems' & 'Transmission Technology..." | Antenna |