Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
Does the Shakespear or standard marine antenna base that is 1" 14tpi fit anything else? What about 1" national fine thread hex bolt? Or 3/4" npt plumbing type thread? Anyone have any luck using something else without ruining the threads? I cannot use one of their oem swivel base things for the application I thinking of doing. thnx for any advice, 73s |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 18:50:16 -0500, "Tom" wrote:
Does the Shakespear or standard marine antenna base that is 1" 14tpi fit anything else? Yes, some farm impliments that I blundered across in the 1970's. 1"-14 UNS (class 2a and 2b) are used only for marine mounts. UNS means "Unified National Special" which makes it a defacto standard thread. What about 1" national fine thread hex bolt? Or 3/4" npt plumbing type thread? Did you perhaps notice that the 1"-14 UNS thread is a straight thread, while all the NPT plumbing threads are tapered? Anyone have any luck using something else without ruining the threads? I cannot use one of their oem swivel base things for the application I thinking of doing. I'll do everyone a favor and not describe some of the antenna mounting abortions that I've seen in the Moss Landing and SCZ harbors, and at a former employer in the marine biz. Let's just say that it can be made to fit a variety of non-standard mounts, in a wide variety of ways, most of really disgusting. thnx for any advice, So, what are you trying to accomplish? -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wasn't sure if the threads were straight as the bolt or tapered as npt
(national pipe taper). I was trying to avoid buying the actual proper thread base (OEM), thought a pipe nipple would work but it didn't, thought a bolt would work but it didn't. So was wondering if the threads were chewed and that was the reason it wasn't working. I don't have that size tap anyway. Mabey a pipe tap but not a 1" national fine thread straight tap. Wanted to make a base but now see they are only 20 bucks on fleabay What would be the best antenna for 2m one could fit up within the 8ft fiberglass shell? That simple cutting of the coax can't be the best can it? This new fiberglass whip I just got is one of the good old ones, very solid and not flaky or nothing like the new shakespear ones they are producing. My cover breaks those too easy. "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 18:50:16 -0500, "Tom" wrote: Does the Shakespear or standard marine antenna base that is 1" 14tpi fit anything else? Yes, some farm impliments that I blundered across in the 1970's. 1"-14 UNS (class 2a and 2b) are used only for marine mounts. UNS means "Unified National Special" which makes it a defacto standard thread. What about 1" national fine thread hex bolt? Or 3/4" npt plumbing type thread? Did you perhaps notice that the 1"-14 UNS thread is a straight thread, while all the NPT plumbing threads are tapered? Anyone have any luck using something else without ruining the threads? I cannot use one of their oem swivel base things for the application I thinking of doing. I'll do everyone a favor and not describe some of the antenna mounting abortions that I've seen in the Moss Landing and SCZ harbors, and at a former employer in the marine biz. Let's just say that it can be made to fit a variety of non-standard mounts, in a wide variety of ways, most of really disgusting. thnx for any advice, So, what are you trying to accomplish? -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:13:50 -0500, "Tom" wrote:
I wasn't sure if the threads were straight as the bolt or tapered as npt (national pipe taper). 1"-15 UNS are straight threads. If it's expected to be under pressure, it's tapered. If there's no pressure involved, it's usually straight threads (or no threads). I was trying to avoid buying the actual proper thread base (OEM), thought a pipe nipple would work but it didn't, thought a bolt would work but it didn't. So was wondering if the threads were chewed and that was the reason it wasn't working. I don't have that size tap anyway. Mabey a pipe tap but not a 1" national fine thread straight tap. 1" UNF is 12 TPI (threads per inch). 1" UNC is 9 TPI http://www.gewinde-normen.de/en/unified-fine-thread.html? Wanted to make a base but now see they are only 20 bucks on fleabay $13 for plastic: http://www.ebay.com/itm/150781789267 Plenty more to choose from: www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=marine+antenna+mount What would be the best antenna for 2m one could fit up within the 8ft fiberglass shell? What's a "shell"? I'm visualizing a giant fiberglass clam shell. Very marine looking, but not your typical vessel. Can you be a bit more specific? Does 2m mean 144-148MHz ham radio, or a 6ft marine fiberglass antenna? That simple cutting of the coax can't be the best can it? I don't understand. That "best" at doing what? This new fiberglass whip I just got is one of the good old ones, very solid and not flaky or nothing like the new shakespear ones they are producing. My cover breaks those too easy. First a "shell", than an ambiguous use of 2meters, followed by a vague "best", and now a "cover". Perhaps you've had an overdose of election year rhetoric and are trying to emulate the politicians by being vague. Hopefully, it's not contageous. Some clarification would be helpful. If you look inside the older (1970') 3ft and 6ft fiberglass whips, you'll get an interesting surprise. Most of the antenna is sticky back copper tape, about 1/4" wide, and glued to the inside of the fiberglass taper. The fatter antennas are usually better built out of copper plated welding rod. The best are stainless rod. The problem is you can't really tell unless you tear it apart. How to mount a 2.4GHz omni on a 1"-14 marine antenna mount: http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/marine-omni/index.html -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Tom" wrote: Hi Does the Shakespear or standard marine antenna base that is 1" 14tpi fit anything else? What about 1" national fine thread hex bolt? Or 3/4" npt plumbing type thread? Anyone have any luck using something else without ruining the threads? I cannot use one of their oem swivel base things for the application I thinking of doing. thnx for any advice, 73s The thread is Straight Cut as opposed to NPT, which is Tapered... HOWEVER, I have cut 3/4" NPT Threads, using my Pipe Threader, that will work on Marine Antennas. The trick is to have an Adjustable Die, and cut the threads just a tad bit deeper than normal 3/4" NPT. It works well, as long as your Pipe has enough wall thickness, to take the deeper threading. I have used in in Alaska for years, and had no issues with the antennas or mounts. -- Bruce in Alaska add path before the @ for email |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You really stuck your foot into this one Bruce, now you are going to be stuck answering stupid questions for the next couple of weeks.
The Fiberglass Shell as the OP called it is called a Radome. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radome The problem the OP has - besides being cheap and wanting something for nothing is the fact that he does not understand what is inside of the radome. If you disassemble and Antron A99 or a Diamond X 500 - once inside, you will find a piece of copper wire or steel wire or stainless steel wire that is usually copper plated. Between each section - spaced for certain wavelengths is capacitors of unknown origin which makes the antenna into segments - some for 2 meters and some for 70 CM. This is what gives it its gain. These are purpose built antenna's for those frequencies.. You cannot take a Marine antenna - that uses a different frequency and use it on amateur frequencies - due to the fact that there is no way to get internally inside of the antenna and change the lengths of the segments of the wires inside of the antenna. Unfortunately - there is not a lot of educated Elmers out there that are willing to help a newbe - just due to the fact that most of the people who are left in Amateur Radio came from the CB radio and they were not knowledgeable - like the ones who came before them. Most of them never built anything in their life and are just appliance operators. I believe I had this conversation with this person or another person like this person previously.. My advice was that if the threads are of a ******* Origin and you are not willing to repair them or buy the mount to throw away the antenna.. They do not make a tap and die or make one that is economically feasable to repair a $10.00 antenna.. When you get into non standard threads - if you can find a tap and die - they tend to be quite pricey.. We are talking $60 - $100 each... You would have to fix a whole bunch of antenna's just to break even, and it wouldn't be economical to buy it to fix one antenna. You could buy a Diamond X 510 for about $150.00 and it would be already designed for the frequencys you desire to operate on. JMHO CJ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:29:10 -0900, Bruce Gordon
wrote: The thread is Straight Cut as opposed to NPT, which is Tapered... HOWEVER, I have cut 3/4" NPT Threads, using my Pipe Threader, that will work on Marine Antennas. The trick is to have an Adjustable Die, and cut the threads just a tad bit deeper than normal 3/4" NPT. It works well, as long as your Pipe has enough wall thickness, to take the deeper threading. I have used in in Alaska for years, and had no issues with the antennas or mounts. That sorta works because 3/4" NPT is also 14 TPI (threads per inch). Also, pipe is measured by the inside diameter, while nut and bolt type hardware, which includes 1"-14 antennas, is measured by the outside diameter. The result is that 3/4" NPT and 1"-14 UNS can be made to fit. I've seen the results of this method of antenna mounting. If the antenna base is heavy and strong, it will work. If it's cheap pot metal, the tapered pipe thread will crack the base when tightened. If the 3/4" NPT is a little on the large side, it will be supported by only by one or two threads. Hit the antenna with anything, and the base will peel out of the mount. The practice of using 3/4" NPT mounting is even more of a problem with GPS antennas, which are usually mounted on some manner of pipe. In order to avoid having two thread standards, Trimble and other have standardized on an odd compromise threading that works with both 1"-14 and 3/4" NPT. For example: http://trl.trimble.com/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-8420/Bullet-III_DS.pdf The socket accepts either a 1"-14 straight thread (typical marine antenna mount) or a 3/4" pipe thread. However, to the best of my knowledge, such a thread is not used in marine antennas. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:08:13 +0000, Channel Jumper
wrote: You really stuck your foot into this one Bruce, now you are going to be stuck answering stupid questions for the next couple of weeks. So much for diplomacy. If you disassemble and Antron A99 or a Diamond X 500 - $270 list for the Diamond X-510. http://www.rfparts.com/diamond/x510series.html The problem with such large antennas for VHF use on a vessel is that they have too much gain. The vertical radiation angle is fairly narrow. My guess(tm) is about 5 degrees at 450MHz and 10 degrees at 146MHz. As the vessels pitches and rolls, much of the RF is directed into the water or into the sky, with very little going towards the horizon. Unless one has a gyro stabilized platform, a lower gain antenna might be more useful. once inside, you will find a piece of copper wire or steel wire or stainless steel wire that is usually copper plated. Inside a Diamond X50 dual band ham antenna. http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/Misc/x50.jpg Sorry about the lousy photo. It's badly stitched together from four seperate photos. If you're wondering what happened, the former owner leaned the antenna against the garage wall, and then backed his car into it. Between each section - spaced for certain wavelengths is capacitors of unknown origin which makes the antenna into segments - some for 2 meters and some for 70 CM. This is what gives it its gain. That's the brass sleeve section in the middle. The gain is provided mostly by properly phasing the radiating sections so that the signals add. These are purpose built antenna's for those frequencies.. I should hope so. I would be seriously worried if they were built without any purpose in mind. Perhaps for decorations as it's well known that the uglier the antenna, the better it works. You cannot take a Marine antenna - that uses a different frequency and use it on amateur frequencies - due to the fact that there is no way to get internally inside of the antenna and change the lengths of the segments of the wires inside of the antenna. You'll be amazed at how little is actually inside a marine antenna. I don't have any photos handy. Most are copper tape glued to the inside of the tube, errr... radome. The rest are variations on coaxial (sleeve) antennas. However, for entertainment, I glued some magnetic recording tape (ferrite) along the copper tape and was able to lower the resonant frequency from about 156MHz to about 149MHz. That's not enough for ham use, but does show that it can be done. Most of them never built anything in their life and are just appliance operators. Again the diplomacy problem... They do not make a tap and die or make one that is economically feasable to repair a $10.00 antenna.. When you get into non standard threads - if you can find a tap and die - they tend to be quite pricey.. We are talking $60 - $100 each... http://www.ebay.com/itm/380414359502 $29 However, the dies are rather pricy. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
[quote='Tom[_8_];798370']
I was trying to avoid buying the actual proper thread base (OEM), thought a pipe nipple would work but it didn't, thought a bolt would work but it didn't. Wanted to make a base but now see they are only 20 bucks on fleabay What would be the best antenna for 2m one could fit up within the 8ft fiberglass shell? That simple cutting of the coax can't be the best can it? Well Jeff The OP said he would like to use the marine antenna in place of a 2 meter antenna. YOU ANSWERED YOUR OWN QUESTION WHEN YOU ADVISED HIM THAT THERE WAS TOO MUCH DISPARITY BETWEEN TWO METERS AND THE MARINE BAND. That was my point when I said to throw it away and buy another antenna. Your advice was that although the X510 was about the same size, it had too much gain to be of use on a rolling ship. Then you just go to the next obvious antenna. The Diamond V2000 would give the OP 2 meters, 70 CM and also 6 meters with the same antenna and is only 6' long - or there abouts. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Channel Jumper
I don't think my questions are "stupid". First off, you didn't answer my last question, you sounded pretty intelligent with your swaying me thoroughly into oblivia, completely around my question. It is obvious you understood the question, probably knew the answer, but didn't answer my question. Remember Channel Jumper, radio wave propagation and antenna theory was not what I majored in at the schools. I did graduate you know. I mean a accredited university gave me my masters. Do you have any accredation at all? Well then you cannot call me "stupid". I am willing to bet my career required a lot more years of study than yours. And continuous learning and upgrading. Yes, you are very knowledgable in regards to antenna work, however follow me for a day and I am sure you would be asking a lot of "stupid" questions. I will ignore negative comments from you. But you still didn't answer my last question, you brilliantly jigged right around it. Wouldn't touch it. I figured you didn't know the answer yet it was on topic, about the coils of the dipole, but you went right around it twice. Why not just say you don't know the specific answer? Instead of trying to thrill me with your wealth of knowledge on antenna design and engineering, I just wanted to know lengths and widths. But you read a page from your first year electrical theory course to me that went right around my question. "Channel Jumper" wrote in message ... You really stuck your foot into this one Bruce, now you are going to be stuck answering stupid questions for the next couple of weeks. The Fiberglass Shell as the OP called it is called a Radome. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radome The problem the OP has - besides being cheap and wanting something for nothing is the fact that he does not understand what is inside of the radome. If you disassemble and Antron A99 or a Diamond X 500 - once inside, you will find a piece of copper wire or steel wire or stainless steel wire that is usually copper plated. Between each section - spaced for certain wavelengths is capacitors of unknown origin which makes the antenna into segments - some for 2 meters and some for 70 CM. This is what gives it its gain. These are purpose built antenna's for those frequencies.. You cannot take a Marine antenna - that uses a different frequency and use it on amateur frequencies - due to the fact that there is no way to get internally inside of the antenna and change the lengths of the segments of the wires inside of the antenna. Unfortunately - there is not a lot of educated Elmers out there that are willing to help a newbe - just due to the fact that most of the people who are left in Amateur Radio came from the CB radio and they were not knowledgeable - like the ones who came before them. Most of them never built anything in their life and are just appliance operators. I believe I had this conversation with this person or another person like this person previously.. My advice was that if the threads are of a ******* Origin and you are not willing to repair them or buy the mount to throw away the antenna.. They do not make a tap and die or make one that is economically feasable to repair a $10.00 antenna.. When you get into non standard threads - if you can find a tap and die - they tend to be quite pricey.. We are talking $60 - $100 each... You would have to fix a whole bunch of antenna's just to break even, and it wouldn't be economical to buy it to fix one antenna. You could buy a Diamond X 510 for about $150.00 and it would be already designed for the frequencys you desire to operate on. JMHO CJ -- Channel Jumper |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Marine 2m Antenna wanted | Antenna | |||
help with a marine antenna | Antenna | |||
Marine band antenna for the Yaesu VX-7R | Antenna | |||
FA: CB ANTENNA M'CYLE-MARINE-BOAT>ANTENNA SPECIALIST MR306 | CB | |||
Is it a CB or VHF marine antenna? | Antenna |