Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in message . ..
Zc = 376.730 · ohms That is, the Z of free space is expressed in exactly the same terms as a carbon composition resistor. Now given the genesis of this debate is that free space Z is somehow different from the expression of Radiation Resistance (e.g. 37 Ohms for a monopole) the only possible rhetorical objection is that free space is not lossy like a carbon resistor (non-dissipative). Well, neither is the Radiation Resistance! Even rhetoric fails. ;-) Thank you Richard! Someone that's making sense on this NG after Roy lost his sense! An antenna is a structure that transforms Radiation Resistance into the Impedance of free space, as shown, and by definition. Both use identical MKS units, both are identical characteristics. Ohms are still always Ohms, regardless of what you are measuring. And it's very interesting that the E and H fields have units of Volts/meter and Ampere(turn)/meter, which when you divide one by the other, you get basically Volts/ampere, just like you would in a transmission line. But I don't claim that a wave traveling in a transmission line is the same as a wave traveling through free space, even if Roy claims this is what i mean. Slick |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |