Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey,
I've been getting different readings on my power meter that depend on the length of coax that i use to the meter (into a Cantenna). This is a push-pull VHF 300 watt transmitter with a coax stub harmonic filter on the output. My digital Daiwa will read about 310 watts incident power using a 4 foot RG-8X jumper coax (from filter to meter), and about 240 watts using a 12 foot section of RG-8X!!?? VSWR stays the same at about 1.4:1 . There is the old ham wife's tale that you can tune your transmitter for a better match if you adjust the legnth of your coax to the antenna. And from a theoretical point of view, it _should_ be only a tale, because if your antenna is not a perfect 50 Ohms, the length of the coax should still not matter, because the constant VSWR circles around the center of the Smith Chart have just that, the same SWR independant of the wavelengths away from the antenna (assuming 50 Ohm transmission lines are used). OTOH, the actual series equivalent complex impedance will be alternating from inductive to capacitive, every 1/2 wavelength. So perhaps this will tune/detune the amplifier? Any non-bullsh** advice/explainations appreciated. Dr. Slick |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
With a non-resistive load, the length of the coax and placement of an
inexpensive (e.g. non-Bird) meter will cause different readings. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dr. Slick", Sure, for the CB crowd, it's in increments of 3 feet. 'Doc |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr. Slick wrote:
This is a push-pull VHF 300 watt transmitter with a coax stub harmonic filter on the output. My digital Daiwa will read about 310 watts incident power using a 4 foot RG-8X jumper coax (from filter to meter), and about 240 watts using a 12 foot section of RG-8X!!?? VSWR stays the same at about 1.4:1 . Remember the maximum power transfer theorem? The transmitter probably works better into some impedances than into others. With an SWR of 1.4:1, the transmitter will see a resistance between 35.7 ohms and 70 ohms with a reactance between zero and about plus or minus j15. Knowing the frequency and VF of the RG-8X, you should be able to estimate the two impedances seen by the transmitter. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarmo Tammaru" wrote in message ...
You don't say what VHF frequency, but the Cantenna is probably unsuitable at that frequency. Your amp is spec'd to put out 300W into 50 Ohms, not 35 or 70. It could put out more or less power into a different impedance. Your best bet is to build a little L network right at the Cantenna, adjust it for 1:1 SWR, and then measure the power. Another approach would be to string all the RG58 you own in series with the 8X. Tam/WB2TT Less than 150 MHz. Someone else suggested that i place the meter right at the cantenna, to at least exclude the patch from meter to dummy load. Unfortunately, as i have mentioned before, the cantenna is not the greatest 50 Ohms at anything above 10-20 MHz. Slick |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
W5DXP wrote in message ...
Remember the maximum power transfer theorem? The transmitter probably works better into some impedances than into others. With an SWR of 1.4:1, the transmitter will see a resistance between 35.7 ohms and 70 ohms with a reactance between zero and about plus or minus j15. Knowing the frequency and VF of the RG-8X, you should be able to estimate the two impedances seen by the transmitter. Actually, i read off of my Smith Chart about +/- j20, but you are close. Anyhow, my point is that the ham "wife's tale" of adjusting the coax length for lowest SWR may be truly just a tale. However, in my case, the SWR doesn't change much, while the INCIDENT power does!!! To me, this may be due to the fact that the PA isn't 50 Ohms at the output (I'll bet not many really are), and so a swing of +/- j20 may improve or degrade how close you are to a conjugate match. What do you dudes think? Dr. Slick |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr. Slick wrote:
However, in my case, the SWR doesn't change much, while the INCIDENT power does!!! Guess I wasn't clear. There are an infinite number of impedances on a constant SWR circle. The transmitter likes some of those impedances better than others. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dr. Slick" wrote in message om... Someone else suggested that i place the meter right at the cantenna, to at least exclude the patch from meter to dummy load. No, you don't want to do that. Put as much loss as you can between the meter and the Cantenna. 100 feet of RG58 will have about 6.5 db of loss. It will make your load a lot closer to 50 Ohms. There are Tables that show SWR as a function of cable loss for a given mismatch. One chart that I have in "Reference Data for Radio Engineers" shows that with a load SWR of 1.4, and 6.5 db of cable loss, the SWR at the driving end is around 1.075. Note that you DO NOT want low loss coax. Tam/WB2TT |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |