Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I ran across some statements in a magazine artical a while back that has me
wondering if true or not. One example is that a directional wattmeter such as the Bird does not make any differance as to the line impedance. That is if you have a 50 ohm line and 50 ohm antenna or a 70 ohm line and antenna, the swr will calculate to the same which in this case would be 1:1. Also if the line and load impedance is differant, the swr will still calculate out to the same. that is say you have a 50 ohm line and 100 ohm load or a 70 ohm line and 140 ohm load the same directional wattmeter such as the Bird or a Drake w4 will still calculate the same 2:1 swr even if they are not set up for the differances in impedance. All that is asuming a line say 50 to 100 feet long so the standing waves can really form. I do know that the transmitter tuning will be differant due to the 50 or 70 ohm impedance even if the swr shows 1:1. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/11/2014 11:00 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote:
I ran across some statements in a magazine artical a while back that has me wondering if true or not. One example is that a directional wattmeter such as the Bird does not make any differance as to the line impedance. That is if you have a 50 ohm line and 50 ohm antenna or a 70 ohm line and antenna, the swr will calculate to the same which in this case would be 1:1. Also if the line and load impedance is differant, the swr will still calculate out to the same. that is say you have a 50 ohm line and 100 ohm load or a 70 ohm line and 140 ohm load the same directional wattmeter such as the Bird or a Drake w4 will still calculate the same 2:1 swr even if they are not set up for the differances in impedance. All that is asuming a line say 50 to 100 feet long so the standing waves can really form. I do know that the transmitter tuning will be differant due to the 50 or 70 ohm impedance even if the swr shows 1:1. Hello, and in order for a directional wattmeter (DWM) to give the correct incident (forward) and reflected readings from the load, the source (transmitter) output impedance and the design characteristic impedance of the DWM should ideally be equal. For example, consider a "classic" Bird model 43 designed for a 50 ohm system connected between a 75 ohm transmitter source and some arbitrary load impedance. Any reflections returned from the load to the transmitter are re-reflected rather than absorbed. These re-reflections add to the sampled transmit power in the incident 50-ohm termination in the Bird DWM and also affect the sampled load reflected value. The result is incorrect incident and reflected indications on the DWM. As an aside, back in the analog days of TV this same phenomenon could result in ghosting on the TV screen when 50-ohm power splitters/combiners or directional couplers were used on a 75-ohm TV signal distribution system. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO, -- J. B. Wood e-mail: |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
J.B. Wood wrote:
On 06/11/2014 11:00 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote: I ran across some statements in a magazine artical a while back that has me wondering if true or not. One example is that a directional wattmeter such as the Bird does not make any differance as to the line impedance. That is if you have a 50 ohm line and 50 ohm antenna or a 70 ohm line and antenna, the swr will calculate to the same which in this case would be 1:1. Also if the line and load impedance is differant, the swr will still calculate out to the same. that is say you have a 50 ohm line and 100 ohm load or a 70 ohm line and 140 ohm load the same directional wattmeter such as the Bird or a Drake w4 will still calculate the same 2:1 swr even if they are not set up for the differances in impedance. All that is asuming a line say 50 to 100 feet long so the standing waves can really form. I do know that the transmitter tuning will be differant due to the 50 or 70 ohm impedance even if the swr shows 1:1. Hello, and in order for a directional wattmeter (DWM) to give the correct incident (forward) and reflected readings from the load, the source (transmitter) output impedance and the design characteristic impedance of the DWM should ideally be equal. For example, consider a "classic" Bird model 43 designed for a 50 ohm system connected between a 75 ohm transmitter source and some arbitrary load impedance. Any reflections returned from the load to the transmitter are re-reflected rather than absorbed. These re-reflections add to the sampled transmit power in the incident 50-ohm termination in the Bird DWM and also affect the sampled load reflected value. The result is incorrect incident and reflected indications on the DWM. The assumption probably is that the length of the piece of 50 ohm line in the wattmeter is short relative to the wavelength, and has little influence on the system. That should be true below 200 MHz or so. Once the line length is approaching a quarter wavelength (at about 900 MHz), there will be considerable influence of the mismatch. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff wrote:
From the Bird 43 manual: "There may be cases where it is necessary to use the Bird 43 with a non-50 ohm transmission line. If the reflected power is less than 10% and the frequency is below 200 MHz, the resulting mismatch will not be too serious. At higher test frequencies and/or higher reflected power levels, the load impedance will change when the wattmeter is removed from the circuit. Ah I did not even read that manual, but my guess from the width of the Bird 43 and the relative wavelength was completely correct :-) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
El 11-06-14 17:00, Ralph Mowery escribió:
I ran across some statements in a magazine artical a while back that has me wondering if true or not. One example is that a directional wattmeter such as the Bird does not make any differance as to the line impedance. That is if you have a 50 ohm line and 50 ohm antenna or a 70 ohm line and antenna, the swr will calculate to the same which in this case would be 1:1. Also if the line and load impedance is differant, the swr will still calculate out to the same. that is say you have a 50 ohm line and 100 ohm load or a 70 ohm line and 140 ohm load the same directional wattmeter such as the Bird or a Drake w4 will still calculate the same 2:1 swr even if they are not set up for the differances in impedance. All that is asuming a line say 50 to 100 feet long so the standing waves can really form. I do know that the transmitter tuning will be differant due to the 50 or 70 ohm impedance even if the swr shows 1:1. A directional coupler is designed for a certain reference impedance. A 50 Ohms coupler reads zero reflected power when terminated with 50 Ohms. It doesn't matter how you generate the 50 Ohms load. Using 75 Ohms cable gives large uncertainty if you want to measure the VSWR inside the 75 Ohms cable. An example: A 75 Ohms cable terminated with 112.5 Ohms has VSWR=1.5 inside the 75 Ohms cable. When you connect this combination (that is 75 Ohms cable plus 112.5 Ohms termination) to a 50 Ohms coupler, VSWR reading on the coupler will vary between 0 and 2.25 (depending on length of 75 Ohms cable between load and coupler). So you can't use a 50 Ohm referenced coupler with scalair outputs to measure the VSWR inside a 75 Ohms cable. You can use the 50 Ohms coupler to measure the net power flowing through the coupler. The net power equals Pforward - Preflected. Of course the electrical length of the coupler should be well below 0.1 lambda, especially when there is large relative deviation between cable impedance and the coupler's design impedance. When the source impedance doesn't match the coupler reference impedance, the forward power reading on the coupler can be more than the net power supplied by the source. This is due to multiple reflections. VSWR readings do not depend on source impedance. -- Wim PA3DJS Please remove abc first in case of PM |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/12/2014 09:59 AM, Wimpie wrote:
When the source impedance doesn't match the coupler reference impedance, the forward power reading on the coupler can be more than the net power supplied by the source. This is due to multiple reflections. VSWR readings do not depend on source impedance. Hello, and I think it would be more accurate to state that the definition of load VSWR ("SWR") is source impedance agnostic but it is always referenced to some value, say 50 or 75 ohms. If the load VSWR is being calculated from incident and reflected readings from a mismatched directional WM (which is just a directional coupler with terminations and an indicator(s))then errors will occur, as has been pointed out already. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO, -- J. B. Wood e-mail: |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|