Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The sure sign of a false argument is if it is accompanied by
the aggression of personal remarks. Truth needs no such sparring partners. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gareth" wrote in news:m2ojm5$fv1$1@dont-
email.me: The sure sign of a false argument is if it is accompanied by the aggression of personal remarks. Truth needs no such sparring partners. I've been trying to decide whether I can shun you without breaking my promise. I think I can now. I come here to learn a bit, and wading through this dreck is NOT helping. I'm done. My almost ineffectual gesture of putting you on the plonk list will do little good, but at least it will reduce any further temptation to get involved in this stuff. I don't mind other people's replies to him, so long as they deal with some basics, after all the repetition might teach ME, even if it won't tech him. Whaty I d hope for in addition is that people will quit attacking him unless it strictly needed to defend themselves, and there are usually better ways to do that. If people really need a fast breifing on Gareth's nature and behaviour, I suggest pointing to a few press articles and leaving it at that, instead of trying to re-interpret these events in further flames. I found more than I wanted to know, just by looking for it, and I don't want to see it, or its effects, any more. That half hour told me more than any of the back-and-forth stuff going on in TEN YEARS of Usenet postings easily found online, which I read very few of once I saw more smoke than fire. I'm blocking your posts, Gareth, because I don't want to be tempted to raise any smoke after this moment. I'm done. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Lostgallifreyan" wrote in message
. .. I'm blocking your posts, Gareth, because I don't want to be tempted to raise any smoke after this moment. I'm done. Stupid boy. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
gareth wrote:
The sure sign of a false argument is if it is accompanied by the aggression of personal remarks. Truth needs no such sparring partners. There is no such thing as "The philosophy of short antennae". There is the science of electromagnetics that explains how ANY antenna, including short ones, works. The phrase "aggression of personal remarks" is word saland babble. -- Jim Pennino |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Radiation from antennae - a new philosophy | Antenna | |||
Radiation from antennae - a new philosophy | Antenna | |||
Radiation from antennae - a new philosophy | Antenna | |||
Radiation from antennae - a new philosophy | Antenna |