Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I already have a 5 element, 6m beam installed on a telescoping pushup pole
guyed with metalic guys. I'm thinking of putting a matching beam below the present one and phasing them (with top/bottom/both switching). Will the metalic guys have much effect on the bottom antenna? There will be about 3 ft of clearance at minimum when turning. 73, jw K9RZZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Once you've finsished installing
the second beam and the switching don't forget to point it toward Southern California during band openings - I've got Illinois, Iowa and Michigan but no Wisconsin .......... yet, hopefully your new setup will change that 8-} 73 & best of luck, Howard Thanks for input, will give it a whirl. Hearing bursts from AF6O DM14 right now, but no QSO yet. CU on the band ! jw |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What Bill says is correct, and it is easy to implement on 6M. Put one
insulator as close to the mast as possible and another 4 - 5 feet down the guy. Even though that is close to quarter wave, it isn't resonant unless you leave out the insulator. That will put the unknown grounded remainder of the guys almost a half wave away, which is barely acceptable, but better than having them right up under the antenna. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address "Bill Turner" wrote in message ... On 11 Jul 2004 01:25:32 GMT, (J999w) wrote: Will the metalic guys have much effect on the bottom antenna? There will be about 3 ft of clearance at minimum when turning. __________________________________________________ _______ Three feet is pretty close. I'd break it up with insulators or else use Phillystrand for the part close to the antenna. The important thing is whether the guy wire is resonant (or close to resonance). If you leave it as is, you're always going to wonder if you shoulda. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:22:54 -0500, "Crazy George"
wrote: What Bill says is correct, and it is easy to implement on 6M. Put one insulator as close to the mast as possible and another 4 - 5 feet down the guy. Even though that is close to quarter wave, it isn't resonant unless you leave out the insulator. That will put the unknown grounded remainder of the guys almost a half wave away, which is barely acceptable, but better than having them right up under the antenna. Well, now you & Bill have me wondering if I should go up on the roof and redo the guys ....... which is no easy task for me. I did however use lengths that aren't resonant ........ aww heck, it's working now so I guess I'll leave it alone until the next time I need to add/change anything else. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:04:38 -0700, Bill Turner
wrote: On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:45:22 -0700, Howard mensch90249 wrote: Well, now you & Bill have me wondering if I should go up on the roof and redo the guys ....... which is no easy task for me. I did however use lengths that aren't resonant ........ aww heck, it's working now so I guess I'll leave it alone until the next time I need to add/change anything else. _________________________________________________ ________ Ok, if you're going to leave it up as is, at least do one simple test. Monitor the SWR as you rotate it through 360 degrees. If there is no change at all, you can sleep well at night. If you get radical swings in SWR, break up the guys ASAP. If you get "moderate" swings in SWR... try do define "moderate". :-) Bill, Did that test when I installed the antenna and there were no changes at all points tested (checked every 45 degrees). Funny thing is that I've seen insulators used and know why they're used ...... it just didn't occur to me to consider them as I was fixated on using a non-resonant guy length. Let's just call me lucky this time and lesson learned for the future. As to defining moderate........I'm not biting 8-} Howard |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howard:
See, here's the problem. If those guys are tied to a metal mast on one end and ground on the other, then you have no idea what the electrical length is. And, if the mast is grounded as it is supposed to be, then the mast, ground and guy form a loop which is dangerous even in the "non-resonant" mode. And the SWR test is a very insensitive test. Although if forward gain is the primary criteria, then you are likely OK, but on HF, where front to back and front to side ratios are important, then guy reradiation can be significant enough to mess those up without showing up on SWR. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address "Howard" mensch90249 wrote in message ... On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:04:38 -0700, Bill Turner wrote: On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:45:22 -0700, Howard mensch90249 wrote: Well, now you & Bill have me wondering if I should go up on the roof and redo the guys ....... which is no easy task for me. I did however use lengths that aren't resonant ........ aww heck, it's working now so I guess I'll leave it alone until the next time I need to add/change anything else. _________________________________________________ ________ Ok, if you're going to leave it up as is, at least do one simple test. Monitor the SWR as you rotate it through 360 degrees. If there is no change at all, you can sleep well at night. If you get radical swings in SWR, break up the guys ASAP. If you get "moderate" swings in SWR... try do define "moderate". :-) Bill, Did that test when I installed the antenna and there were no changes at all points tested (checked every 45 degrees). Funny thing is that I've seen insulators used and know why they're used ...... it just didn't occur to me to consider them as I was fixated on using a non-resonant guy length. Let's just call me lucky this time and lesson learned for the future. As to defining moderate........I'm not biting 8-} Howard |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:37:10 -0500, "Crazy George"
wrote: Howard: See, here's the problem. If those guys are tied to a metal mast on one end and ground on the other, then you have no idea what the electrical length is. And, if the mast is grounded as it is supposed to be, then the mast, ground and guy form a loop which is dangerous even in the "non-resonant" mode. And the SWR test is a very insensitive test. Although if forward gain is the primary criteria, then you are likely OK, but on HF, where front to back and front to side ratios are important, then guy reradiation can be significant enough to mess those up without showing up on SWR. Thanks for the additional info/perspective. I realize the SWR is only a portion of the picture, though the only element I can actually measure. F/B isn't much of an issue for me, from where I live most of the directions I point my beam has the back pointing to the ocean. The difficulty in adding insulators is that I don't do work on the roof anymore & the handyman whom I've been using for such tasks is pretty heavily booked these days. In any case, once he's free it's not a huge task and with the worst case being no difference and the best case being a better radiation pattern this is now on my list of things to get done. Thanks George and Bill for your input! 73, Howard |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Identify beam | Antenna | |||
How does rain effect antennas | Antenna | |||
Using a metal roof as a ground plane | Antenna | |||
Bricks effect in dipole resonance? Help! | Antenna | |||
Vee Beam info needed | Antenna |