Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob, K5QWG wrote:
"Or should I go buy some bare solid copper wire?" Depends on frequency. As a path for electricity, the earth is like a leaky capacitor or a good capacitor in parallel with a resistance. Terman says on page 807 of his 1955 edition: "At broadcast (550-1600 KHz) and lower frequencies the ratio of capacitive reactance of the earth to the earth resitivity (sigma reciprocal=1/conductivity) is considerably greater than unity, so to a first approximation the earth can be considered as purely resistive.----Conversely at frequencies of the order of 10 MHz and greater, the impedance represented by ground (not sea water) is primarily capacitive, and ground-wave attenuation at a given physical distance is determined by the factor of frequency divided by the dielectric constant plus 1." So for low frequencies use bare wire. For high frequencies, you won`t notice insulation on your radials, electrically. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Miller" wrote For my general station ground, I have a copper pipe that goes down about one foot -- then hits rock or limestone or whatever. I'd like to enhance the pipe with a few buried radials. I happen to have a 500' roll of 14-guage stranded *insulated* copper wire. Will the insulation keep the wire from becoming "one with the dirt"? Or should I go buy some bare solid copper wire? --- and then Bob added: Question -- is there a problem in using a safety ground as an rf ground, too? If I connected 10x50-ft bare, buried radials to my little pipe, and used it as a safety ground for the station, and also as a ground to work an inverted "L" against, would that be a problem, or should I have separate ground points? -- Hi Bob, can you be more clear on what you meant by "general station ground"? Since you're in thunderstorm country it could be you mean a lightning protection ground. But you also mention safety ground and RF ground so it appears you have multiple requirements here. Conductor choices vary according to the function of the system so it is difficult to generalize about stranded v. solid wire until you can be more specific in your requirements. In some cases neither kind of wire is appropriate, with wide/heavy gage copper strap being the best choice. However many purposes your ground system fulfills, and from however many places it connects to ground rods, one standard always applies: you must always bond all of your earth-references (ground rods) to your station equipment AND the main entrance ground of utility wires coming into your home. Preferably that station single point ground and the Utility single point ground are the same place. Unfortunately few of us are so lucky as to be able to locate our station right at the main Utility service entrance. When the two are far apart that creates problems. With a lot of help from this group, and professional engineer review, I completed a station grounding and lightning protection system that accounted for those problems. The complete site construction plans are listed at: http://members.cox.net/pc-usa/station/grounding.htm Hope this helps, Jack Painter Virginia Beach, VA On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 04:13:37 GMT, Richard Clark wrote: Insulated will make a poor 60Hz safety ground (which you should connect this ground to anyway). Insulated wire will make a perfectly good RF ground (upwards to 5 orders of magnitude frequency shift makes a considerable difference in what ground "means"). The pipe, on the other hand, serves very little purpose. It is inadequate for a safety ground, and useless for RF and maybe just suitable for providing a mast base. It does give you a physical reference point - kinda like a big solder lug. Use up all your wire and enjoy - another 500 or 5000 feet won't bring as much return as the first 500. For radials, try 10 X 50 feet, or 50 X 10 feet or something in between. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My server will not download the reply I made to this post. Ater new posts
appeared and mine did not, I resent (twice). I understand they all did post, and I apologize for resending what was already there. If anyone knows what setting could be casuing them to be invisible (to me) I would appreciate learning how to fix it. Even deleting the entire group and downloading all headers and message bodies did not show my posts in this thread. Best regards, and maybe someone could reply to this invisible-to-me post, LOL. Jack |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:52:18 -0400, "Jack Painter"
wrote: My server will not download the reply I made to this post. Ater new posts appeared and mine did not, I resent (twice). I understand they all did post, and I apologize for resending what was already there. If anyone knows what setting could be casuing them to be invisible (to me) I would appreciate learning how to fix it. Even deleting the entire group and downloading all headers and message bodies did not show my posts in this thread. Best regards, and maybe someone could reply to this invisible-to-me post, LOL. Jack All your posts showed up this afternoon/evening (Monday). Been looking at your website on grounding. Very informative. thanks, bob k5qwg |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Painter wrote:
My server will not download the reply I made to this post. Ater new posts appeared and mine did not, I resent (twice). I understand they all did post, and I apologize for resending what was already there. If anyone knows what setting could be casuing them to be invisible (to me) I would appreciate learning how to fix it. Even deleting the entire group and downloading all headers and message bodies did not show my posts in this thread. Best regards, and maybe someone could reply to this invisible-to-me post, LOL. Jack Everything depends on your news server. When you post a message it is cued for posting with all the other current postings. Depending on how busy the server is, it may not be able to process new postings until it expires a bunch of old ones, to make space. Then it processes latest postings and sends it's information off to other servers for posting. The other servers have the same thing to deal with. If they are busy they may even refuse a packet of postings and your server would have to try again later. My news server is somewhat local to me and I see my postings within a few seconds of posting. But there are some news servers where I won't be able to see my post show up for 6 or 7 hours. Google groups is like this. I just take it on faith that my posting got out. Even when I see it on my news server, I have no idea when it will reach any of the other servers. -- Martin E. Meserve http://www.k7mem.150m.com |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Adding lengths to bare wire antenna? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |