Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
Do you folks have any comments on these new Micro Inverters? Specically the Enphase M215. I understand there is a new one Enphase M215 IG I believe that addresses the interference experience by hams on VHF band. These are the Micro Inverters two suppliers tole me to use that qualify for the Ontario Microfit program. I reading reviews on Amazon that they are very interfering. Is there a way of grounding them or a equal alternative model that doesn't interfere with ham bands during peak sunlight hours? I need to put 50 of these on my roof under each panel. Any and all comments are greatly appreciated as always. Thanks Gents,,, 73s Tom |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:05:54 -0400, "Tom" wrote:
Do you folks have any comments on these new Micro Inverters? Specically the Enphase M215. I understand there is a new one Enphase M215 IG I believe that addresses the interference experience by hams on VHF band. These are the Micro Inverters two suppliers tole me to use that qualify for the Ontario Microfit program. I reading reviews on Amazon that they are very interfering. Is there a way of grounding them or a equal alternative model that doesn't interfere with ham bands during peak sunlight hours? I need to put 50 of these on my roof under each panel. Any and all comments are greatly appreciated as always. Thanks Gents,,, I help maintain a few grid tied solar systems. Most use Enphase micro inverters. The latest uses M215 IG inverters. Previous models were totally floating and had no grounding points or fault protection. The IG means "integrated ground" and also has a built in ground fault protector. The grounding change probably has nothing to do with EMI/RFI. There are also Chinese clones of these inverters, which ended up at one of these systems thanks to a fly-by-night solar contractor. My guess(tm) is you're dealing with conducted EMI/RFI, not radiated. Therefore, clamp on ferrite beads and blocks should work. http://www.solar-electric.com/installation-parts-and-equipment/electrical-devices-transfer-switches-noise-filters/nosufefi.html When I complained on behalf of one customer that the inverters were trashing OTA TV reception, they installed the ferrite beads for free. I don't think Enphase supplied the ferrites. It's mentioned in their troubleshooting guide, but nowhere else: http://www2.enphase.com/global/files/Enphase_Troubleshooting_Guide.pdf See Pg 22. Note that the filters go as close to the source of the noise (i.e. the M215 IG micro inverters) as possible. I think the M215 IG uses the same 144KHz communications frequency and Zigbee protocol as most everyone else. The problem is that it uses the same power lines that are conducting the switching noise for communications. If your added ferrite beads clobber this signal, the Envoy controller box is going to complain that it can't communicate with the panels. So, be careful when you add a ferrite block as too big a block, wrong material, too many beads, or too many turns, is going to cause problems. I would aim for a 500 KHz low-pass corner frequency. As for grounding, the evolving NEC Article 690.35 for the US requires that literally everything on the roof be well grounded. Since I believe that the noise will be conducted rather than radiated, additional grounding isn't going to do anything useful. In my never humble opinion, filtering is your only option. Good luck. Light reading: http://www.homepower.com/solar-electricity -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you for the information.
That is it in a nutshell. I am waiting for approval for the program, If approved then I can go forward to begin purchasing the system and start building it. Thanks again for this info, 73s "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:05:54 -0400, "Tom" wrote: Do you folks have any comments on these new Micro Inverters? Specically the Enphase M215. I understand there is a new one Enphase M215 IG I believe that addresses the interference experience by hams on VHF band. These are the Micro Inverters two suppliers tole me to use that qualify for the Ontario Microfit program. I reading reviews on Amazon that they are very interfering. Is there a way of grounding them or a equal alternative model that doesn't interfere with ham bands during peak sunlight hours? I need to put 50 of these on my roof under each panel. Any and all comments are greatly appreciated as always. Thanks Gents,,, I help maintain a few grid tied solar systems. Most use Enphase micro inverters. The latest uses M215 IG inverters. Previous models were totally floating and had no grounding points or fault protection. The IG means "integrated ground" and also has a built in ground fault protector. The grounding change probably has nothing to do with EMI/RFI. There are also Chinese clones of these inverters, which ended up at one of these systems thanks to a fly-by-night solar contractor. My guess(tm) is you're dealing with conducted EMI/RFI, not radiated. Therefore, clamp on ferrite beads and blocks should work. http://www.solar-electric.com/installation-parts-and-equipment/electrical-devices-transfer-switches-noise-filters/nosufefi.html When I complained on behalf of one customer that the inverters were trashing OTA TV reception, they installed the ferrite beads for free. I don't think Enphase supplied the ferrites. It's mentioned in their troubleshooting guide, but nowhere else: http://www2.enphase.com/global/files/Enphase_Troubleshooting_Guide.pdf See Pg 22. Note that the filters go as close to the source of the noise (i.e. the M215 IG micro inverters) as possible. I think the M215 IG uses the same 144KHz communications frequency and Zigbee protocol as most everyone else. The problem is that it uses the same power lines that are conducting the switching noise for communications. If your added ferrite beads clobber this signal, the Envoy controller box is going to complain that it can't communicate with the panels. So, be careful when you add a ferrite block as too big a block, wrong material, too many beads, or too many turns, is going to cause problems. I would aim for a 500 KHz low-pass corner frequency. As for grounding, the evolving NEC Article 690.35 for the US requires that literally everything on the roof be well grounded. Since I believe that the noise will be conducted rather than radiated, additional grounding isn't going to do anything useful. In my never humble opinion, filtering is your only option. Good luck. Light reading: http://www.homepower.com/solar-electricity -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 07:15:26 -0400, "Tom" wrote:
That is it in a nutshell. I am waiting for approval for the program, If approved then I can go forward to begin purchasing the system and start building it. One more potential problem. Enphase has an online monitoring system at: https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com/public_systems I suggest that you eventually sign up as a system owner. You can download the data and create your own graphs such as: http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/solar/380732/total-energy-21040613-20150213.jpg Incidentally, you can query the Envoy controller directly either via a web interface or using a graphing program (MRTG): http://blog.tinle.org/?p=111 http://pvoutput.org http://pvoutput.org/outputs.jsp None of the system owners I deal with want me to do this, so I haven't bothered to try it. Now that I'm thinking about it, you might run into another problem. The People's Republic of Santa Cruz (county) uses the NFPA NEC code which now demands 2ft of clearance between the roof peak and the solar panels. This clear area is for ventilating the roof should the house catch fire. I have some issues with this requirement because it significantly reduces the available roof area for panels for no benefit because the other side of a typical hip roof is usually clear of solar panels. You might want to check whether this is a requirement in your area. I have some docs on the topic if becomes a problem. Good luck. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you sir for your expertise again.
Very much appreciated. 73s "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 07:15:26 -0400, "Tom" wrote: That is it in a nutshell. I am waiting for approval for the program, If approved then I can go forward to begin purchasing the system and start building it. One more potential problem. Enphase has an online monitoring system at: https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com/public_systems I suggest that you eventually sign up as a system owner. You can download the data and create your own graphs such as: http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/solar/380732/total-energy-21040613-20150213.jpg Incidentally, you can query the Envoy controller directly either via a web interface or using a graphing program (MRTG): http://blog.tinle.org/?p=111 http://pvoutput.org http://pvoutput.org/outputs.jsp None of the system owners I deal with want me to do this, so I haven't bothered to try it. Now that I'm thinking about it, you might run into another problem. The People's Republic of Santa Cruz (county) uses the NFPA NEC code which now demands 2ft of clearance between the roof peak and the solar panels. This clear area is for ventilating the roof should the house catch fire. I have some issues with this requirement because it significantly reduces the available roof area for panels for no benefit because the other side of a typical hip roof is usually clear of solar panels. You might want to check whether this is a requirement in your area. I have some docs on the topic if becomes a problem. Good luck. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Jeff
Can you comment on the fact that these Enphase converters need 240ac volts (grid connection) to run? This means that if ever the power supplier locally ever shuts down for more than a long period of time that these Enphase units become useless. Around my neck of the woods we are getting more and more power outages lasting longer and longer. These inverters require being connected to the grid to function. I understand the safety requirement and it needing to do this to be certified but it really limits the home owner (or cottage owner in my case). Have you ever worked on a system that was more practical? That qualified for the grid program but was useful when detached from the grid? Seems to me if ever the power company decides to cancel the program you may be stuck with 40 inverters that are useless and are 200 dollars each. Any comments are thankful, Regards Tom "Tom" wrote in message ... Thank you sir for your expertise again. Very much appreciated. 73s "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 07:15:26 -0400, "Tom" wrote: That is it in a nutshell. I am waiting for approval for the program, If approved then I can go forward to begin purchasing the system and start building it. One more potential problem. Enphase has an online monitoring system at: https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com/public_systems I suggest that you eventually sign up as a system owner. You can download the data and create your own graphs such as: http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/solar/380732/total-energy-21040613-20150213.jpg Incidentally, you can query the Envoy controller directly either via a web interface or using a graphing program (MRTG): http://blog.tinle.org/?p=111 http://pvoutput.org http://pvoutput.org/outputs.jsp None of the system owners I deal with want me to do this, so I haven't bothered to try it. Now that I'm thinking about it, you might run into another problem. The People's Republic of Santa Cruz (county) uses the NFPA NEC code which now demands 2ft of clearance between the roof peak and the solar panels. This clear area is for ventilating the roof should the house catch fire. I have some issues with this requirement because it significantly reduces the available roof area for panels for no benefit because the other side of a typical hip roof is usually clear of solar panels. You might want to check whether this is a requirement in your area. I have some docs on the topic if becomes a problem. Good luck. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/20/2015 3:14 PM, Tom wrote:
Hi Jeff Can you comment on the fact that these Enphase converters need 240ac volts (grid connection) to run? This means that if ever the power supplier locally ever shuts down for more than a long period of time that these Enphase units become useless. Around my neck of the woods we are getting more and more power outages lasting longer and longer. These inverters require being connected to the grid to function. I understand the safety requirement and it needing to do this to be certified but it really limits the home owner (or cottage owner in my case). Have you ever worked on a system that was more practical? That qualified for the grid program but was useful when detached from the grid? Seems to me if ever the power company decides to cancel the program you may be stuck with 40 inverters that are useless and are 200 dollars each. Any comments are thankful, Regards Tom Tom, We don't do PV installations, but I have worked with a couple of companies who do. Most of these installations will not run unless they can synchronize with the 60hz line voltage - that is, when power fails, the PV system doesn't run. I know there are some out there which will run off of batteries, but not being familiar with the systems themselves, I can't recommend any. One other caution. At least here on the East Coast, you need a permit to install a PV system. In many jurisdictions the wiring must be done by a licensed electrician, although some will allow you to do it. In most cases, if you are going to do it, you will need to take a test on the National Electric Code before you are allowed to proceed. And finally, the installation must be inspected by building authorities. Failure to do so can cause all kinds of problems. In short, a PV installation is not a DIY project. It's very complex, with numerous building and electric codes involved. And a bad installation can be a serious fire and electric shock hazard. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for commenting Jerry
Yes, all you say is the same here. All elements of the codes must be followed. So you are saying it is possible to be able to use your solar panels when the grid is off? At my cottage the grid shuts off for long times. Thanks "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... On 8/20/2015 3:14 PM, Tom wrote: Hi Jeff Can you comment on the fact that these Enphase converters need 240ac volts (grid connection) to run? This means that if ever the power supplier locally ever shuts down for more than a long period of time that these Enphase units become useless. Around my neck of the woods we are getting more and more power outages lasting longer and longer. These inverters require being connected to the grid to function. I understand the safety requirement and it needing to do this to be certified but it really limits the home owner (or cottage owner in my case). Have you ever worked on a system that was more practical? That qualified for the grid program but was useful when detached from the grid? Seems to me if ever the power company decides to cancel the program you may be stuck with 40 inverters that are useless and are 200 dollars each. Any comments are thankful, Regards Tom Tom, We don't do PV installations, but I have worked with a couple of companies who do. Most of these installations will not run unless they can synchronize with the 60hz line voltage - that is, when power fails, the PV system doesn't run. I know there are some out there which will run off of batteries, but not being familiar with the systems themselves, I can't recommend any. One other caution. At least here on the East Coast, you need a permit to install a PV system. In many jurisdictions the wiring must be done by a licensed electrician, although some will allow you to do it. In most cases, if you are going to do it, you will need to take a test on the National Electric Code before you are allowed to proceed. And finally, the installation must be inspected by building authorities. Failure to do so can cause all kinds of problems. In short, a PV installation is not a DIY project. It's very complex, with numerous building and electric codes involved. And a bad installation can be a serious fire and electric shock hazard. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom wrote:
Thanks for commenting Jerry Yes, all you say is the same here. All elements of the codes must be followed. So you are saying it is possible to be able to use your solar panels when the grid is off? At my cottage the grid shuts off for long times. Thanks Yes, it is possible, but takes more equipment. Most PV systems take the simple approach to the requirement that they not feed into a grid that is off and potentially electrocute a lineman by simply turning off your system. More expensive systems include sensors and relays to isolate your PV system and residence from the grid if the grid turns off. -- Jim Pennino |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, but Enphase Microinverters shut off, SolarEdge inverters shut off, for
just that reason. This makes them certifiable. They are probably the better ones for my application. You mentioned it was possible with more equipment. Can you elaborate? I want to primarily be on the program, but when my grid goes down for any serious length of time what more equipment would you recommend me considering that both meets the code, made in Ontario and is tried and true, suitable for the program. I don't want knock offs or copies, or offshore stuff. Must be certified and meet the code, etc etc, and not so complicated it needs NASA Satelite Engineers to approve my drawings. Thanks wrote in message ... Tom wrote: Thanks for commenting Jerry Yes, all you say is the same here. All elements of the codes must be followed. So you are saying it is possible to be able to use your solar panels when the grid is off? At my cottage the grid shuts off for long times. Thanks Yes, it is possible, but takes more equipment. Most PV systems take the simple approach to the requirement that they not feed into a grid that is off and potentially electrocute a lineman by simply turning off your system. More expensive systems include sensors and relays to isolate your PV system and residence from the grid if the grid turns off. -- Jim Pennino |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need Info: Pure Sine Wave Inverters and Radio Noise | Equipment | |||
micro--waves | Antenna | |||
Inverters | Swap | |||
New micro TNC, anyone got one? | Digital | |||
New micro TNC, anyone got one? | Digital |