Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello, fellow radio amateurs!
I am unlicensed and do not transmit except I send guitar voice mail on the phone and also I send the guitar through FRS for fun. With twenty feet of twinax from IEC, I am now able to receive WHFS in stereo from Annapolis, MD, here in Seven Corners, VA reliably. We'll see if it works at night. Both the antenna and 1/8 stereo phone plug terminations need work, but are working. Could any of you tell me where I can buy some pretinned 1/8 stereo phone plugs with metal sheilded barrels? The ones I buy at Radio Shack don't tin well with rosin flux and a fresh tip, using 60/40 solder. I have to scrape them to bare metal and heat them so much the plastic insulators soften a little. At these frequencies, that matters. Yes, I replaced the polyethylene between the legs with hot melt. Of course I did. But still, see below, there are refinements. I don't know what engineer at Wizard decided to run their dipole antenna in through a phone jack. Fer cryin' out loud, was it just because the line output is a phone jack and they couldn't spare two cents? What a hassle. What a nice radio, now it's done. I will get the serial port version soon and have a free slot for a second OEM IBM speakerphone modem. But that's another story. By using the VU meter on my Cool Edit, I was able to point the antenna. I braced it off the ceiling with a cigarette pack and a strip of double sided foam adhesive tape, then tapped it with a wooden paddle to move it about a degree at a time. It's not an RF meter, but it does get an optimal result. T and I will switch positions next time, so I can interpret the varying audio levels during transmission as indicators of reception quality. Variability was over 30 db. I'll provide a better estimate when we swap positions. I was the one moving the antenna this time. The transmission line hangs straight from the ceiling to the floor, tensioning the twin leads to form an air spaced graduated line. If you stand too close to it, the signal fades, even though it is sheilded. I guess I need a good ground. This is twin wire in this older apartment, not properly grounded. I can go up then rightwards into the heat pump box and terminate to a ground there. No, not the Freon pipe, there will be a proper ground there and I will find it. I've got the long bit already. Best would be to replace the hard corner on the plaster wall, burying the ground leading up from the baseboard behind it, or to groove the face of the wall and bury the ground there. Yes, I know that isn't to code. Anyway, if you know where to buy a good quality, readily tinned phone jack, please let me know. Likewise, if my soldering technique sounds off, please, reply. If you know already through experience that Radio Shack is not the place to go, let me know that and I'll visit Arlington Electronic Wholesalers for a quality product. They are only a bike ride away. I'll give the details of the terminations later, once, as they are, then again, after I've optimized them. I've got five extra feet of cable so there's room to play with terminations at both ends. God, I love new, local music. Yours, Doug Goncz Replikon Research Seven Corners, VA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Excerpting:
From: (Doug Goncz) (Me) With twenty feet of twinax from IEC, I am now able to receive WHFS in stereo from Annapolis, MD, here in Seven Corners, VA reliably. Both the antenna and 1/8 stereo phone plug terminations need work, but are working. Could any of you tell me where I can buy some pretinned 1/8 stereo phone plugs with metal sheilded barrels? Anyway, if you know where to buy a good quality, readily tinned phone jack, please let me know. The ones I buy at Radio Shack don't tin well Yours, Doug Goncz ( ftp://users.aol.com/DGoncz/incoming ) Student member SAE for one year. I love: Dona, Jeff, Kim, Mom, Neelix, Tasha, and Teri, alphabetically. I drive: A double-step Thunderbolt with 657% range. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here are some pics of the antenna:
08/19/2004 07:45AM 112,318 CeilingSpacer.JPG 08/19/2004 07:45AM 111,110 HangerAndLead.JPG 08/19/2004 07:45AM 137,884 LeadCloseup.JPG and links: ftp://users.aol.com/DGoncz/Antenna/CeilingSpacer.JPG ftp://users.aol.com/DGoncz/Antenna/HangerAndLead.JPG ftp://users.aol.com/DGoncz/Antenna/LeadCloseup.JPG I intend to air-space the twin leads down to above head height, then move the remaining twinax to the hanger, after adding a _little bit_ of weight at the bend to tension the leads. This should form an air spaced graduated impedance "converter" without the need for a minimum loss pad. If I could just get a more easily solderable stereo phone jack.... Maybe even one rated for RF.... Yours, Doug Goncz ( ftp://users.aol.com/DGoncz/incoming ) Student member SAE for one year. I love: Dona, Jeff, Kim, Mom, Neelix, Tasha, and Teri, alphabetically. I drive: A double-step Thunderbolt with 657% range. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Aug 2004 14:29:13 GMT, ( Doug Goncz ) wrote:
Dear Richard, You have my thanks for your reply. From: Richard Clark Sounds like you need more practice soldering. All this scraping you describe is unnecessary because you should already have bare metal. I have 36 years of experience soldering. Have you tried tinning Radio Shack's 274-284 connector? It acts as if it's made of stainless steel. Maybe a chisel tip would work better. Why would Radio Shack spend more for stainless steel? Who in their right mind would produce it? I have never had any problems with the cheapest of materials to wet with solder. You are having some other difficulty and it may be this wire you are trying to use (ever try soldering old telephone wire?). Does it wet easily? I think there's a reflection at the jack, forming a resonant tank. The frequency depends on the cable length. A little less than 20 feet. 20 feet is not resonant (first resonance that is) at any particular commercial frequency. it is your attempts to connect the twin lead to it (if that is what you mean by twinax). I had used twinlead. I went to twinxial cable, two 20 gage conductors with polyethylene around them, in a polyethylene carrier, with a foil shield and what must be close to 100% overbraid. It is Coleman Cable 99301 20 gage 100 ohm twinaxial type CL2. You need to go to radio shack and buy a TV-Coax BalUn. No, this is a stereo phone plug with balanced signal on tip and ring. I have added ground on the barrel. Sleeve. The original antenna is a 22 gage dipole insulated with polyethylene, not PVC. Immaterial really. Each leg is 30 inches long. The pair to the plug is 39 1/2 inches long. Still rather immaterial. There are optimal lengths, but trivial for receivers. We're on the third floor. I note that if the antenna is allowed to tilt, the signal fades. Indicative of multipath rather than actually pointing at the transmitter. Your antenna is looking into a soup of direct transmission waves, and reflections, re-reflections and so on. Alternatively, you don't have enough signal, and all the tilting, wiring, jacking, and soldering in the world is not going to make up for it. Add about 10dB of amplification at the antenna. I have replaced the cigarette pack spacer by a foam block. It's level now. The boom surface is three inches from the ceiling. Should it be farther from the ceiling? There is nothing good about its close proximity. However, it may be benign. You should not be as close as the length of any antenna element from other conductors (you don't know what is in the ceiling for the thirty odd inches proximity). I just filed up a chisel tip. That is poor practice. You are already melting the connector's plastic. Solder should flow within seconds at these small dimensions for even a 30W iron with a pencil tip. This morning I lengthened the lead from the antenna to the twinax by stripping more shield, foil, and filler. Now it works very badly. No stereo reception of WHFS. Extending the sheild with foil helped. The legs are 18 inches long. Like I said, this is all futile reminiscent of tin foil rabbit ears aligned with the rising moon and setting Venus. Your signal is marginal and suffering from multipath to boot. What I need is: How long should the legs be at the antenna end? Length is not an issue, separation is. Even here it is of no particular concern. The enforcement of that is dictated by the mechanical connections at the antenna and the taper to the usual, conventional twin line has been commonplace for 60 years. How long should the filler alone be? How long should the section with foil over filler be? (Should this foil be tapered?) How long should the braid be? These are unconventional and cannot be said to be aiding you whatever optimal values may be offered. How long should the rest of cable, in its natural condition be? The only criteria is that it should not be so long as to attenuate the signal through loss. Conventional installations for years went tens of feet to a hundred feet - depending upon signal strength. You don't have signal strength. What's a good way to terminate the twinaxial cable to the phone plug? I seriously doubt you have a female stereo connector to plug into - this too is unconventional. If you do, the sleeve connection was never used in the original configuration (the original antenna only had two leads to begin with by your description). Twinax (Triax) is not conventional and you give every appearance of either shorting out the antenna, and only picking up opportunistic signal strength; or you have a floating shield that is picking up opportunistic signal strengths and coupling it randomly into the receive signal from the antenna. Either way, there is something definitely fishy about the arrangement. If you want to persist with using twinax, connect the two shields together at both ends (and at the phono end, going to the ring, and the center conductor to the tip), and do not make any sleeve connection at the radio. Now what, I wonder? Buy an amplifier. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Goncz wrote:
I have 36 years of experience soldering. Don't worry, Doug, your apprenticeship will be up soon. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Aug 2004 14:29:13 GMT, ( Doug Goncz ) wrote:
Dear Richard, You have my thanks for your reply. From: Richard Clark Sounds like you need more practice soldering. All this scraping you describe is unnecessary because you should already have bare metal. I have 36 years of experience soldering. Have you tried tinning Radio Shack's 274-284 connector? It acts as if it's made of stainless steel. Maybe a chisel tip would work better. Doug, I too have found that RatShack audio connectors do not take to solder well. Not always, perhaps a quarter to a third of the ones I've used. A narrow chisel tip has worked well for me as has going to one of the diminishing number of electronics supply shops for my parts. However, I realize not every area has such a place. If you have a Fry's Electronics store in your area it is worth looking there for both audio and RF connectors as well as soldering equipment - pick out a few different tips Howard |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, I've got it.
ftp://users.aol.com/DGoncz/Antenna/ 08/22/2004 05:43AM 161,463 BoomClip.JPG 08/19/2004 07:45AM 112,318 CeilingSpacer.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 180,516 ConnectionDetail.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 190,270 ConnectorDetail.JPG 08/19/2004 07:45AM 111,110 HangerAndLead.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 192,334 HangerDetail.JPG 08/22/2004 05:44AM 126,769 HangerOverall.JPG 08/19/2004 07:45AM 137,884 LeadCloseup.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 157,620 OverallConnection.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 129,931 OverallView.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 128,858 OverallView2.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 133,346 PlugCovered.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 100,341 PlugFilled.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 96,303 PlugSoldered.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 102,568 PlugTaped.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 146,279 PlugWhipped.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 172,030 ShieldClip.JPG 08/22/2004 05:43AM 199,604 StrainRelief.JPG WHFS in stereo at 3 AM. I note the plug has to be in just more than half way, not all the way for best results. Maybe I should be using a balun, coax, and a phone jack adapter as suggested. But the original antenna was a dipole. So what did they do, ground one leg? I have checked and the sleeve/barrel at the computer is grounded. I'll pull the board and have another look at the traces. I'm sure tip and ring are balanced but we'll just have a look under the hood.... The flat chisel tip did a much better job of transferring heat to the connector lug and hardly any plastic melted this time. The lug heated quickly and the tip drew a film of solder over it. My apprenticeship ended in 1986. I filled the space with hot melt, and applied a little over the connection, then taped it, drew over the braid, and whipped the braid down over the end, with the ends of the braid falling neatly into the groove between the threads and the flange. Then I lacquered the whipping with nail polish. I'll heat shrink over it some day. The boom and therefore the reflector elements are grounded, as they normally would be. I don't know if this does anything. They are grounded from the sheild through a clip lead to a bracket supporting a reflector element. No active amplification is used. It works just great. No rabbit ears, no aluminum foil, and it picks up pointed due east as it should. All 10 FM stations on my dial read the same on the VU meter, all are in stereo, and there is very little noise or interference. Just one thing. There's a cable dangling from the middle of the ceiling. For now, primary Teri can live with this. We will be sharing this whole space soon. Right now I am renting 26 square feet of office space and paying towards the cable modem and fax line. Yours, Doug Goncz ( ftp://users.aol.com/DGoncz/incoming ) Student member SAE for one year. I love: Dona, Jeff, Kim, Mom, Neelix, Tasha, and Teri, alphabetically. I drive: A double-step Thunderbolt with 657% range. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Aug 2004 10:01:17 GMT, ( Doug Goncz ) wrote:
OK, I've got it. ftp://users.aol.com/DGoncz/Antenna/ WHFS in stereo at 3 AM. I note the plug has to be in just more than half way, not all the way for best results. Maybe I should be using a balun, coax, and a phone jack adapter as suggested. Yes, very much if things are this touchy. You are trying to feed a high Z antenna into a low Z cable. Radio Shack has a very common BalUn product designed to take care of this very simply (and using common coaxial products they sell too). No active amplification is used. That's fine, but by all of your accounts, you are on the thin edge. For now, primary Teri can live with this. Hi Doug, Teri may be able to get along with it much more, if you realized you have two antennas in one and simply remove one of them. Simple, is easier said than simple. By all appearances you have a combination FM-TV antenna as I see at least 5 elements (you don't show the entire antenna by the way) and you are only using 3 of them. Your connection should be at the end that is pointing (east) at the station you want to hear. If it is not, you have it pointed backwards and this may explain why things are so hinky. Another clue that you can verify. There should be another set of antenna connections (like wing nuts that presently you connect to) at the OPPOSITE end of the boom - n'est pas? They should be on the next to last elements before the end of the boom. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wizard Radio in Seven Corners, VA, to receive WHFS in Annapolis | Antenna |