Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could someone tell me what the radiation angles of the following aerials
(roughly) a Half wave dipole Quarter wave verticle Longwire TIA, Richard |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
All of these antennas radiate in all directions.
Roy Lewallen, W7EL Richard wrote: Could someone tell me what the radiation angles of the following aerials (roughly) a Half wave dipole Quarter wave verticle Longwire TIA, Richard |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard wrote:
Could someone tell me what the radiation angles of the following aerials (roughly) a Half wave dipole Quarter wave verticle Longwire All can be known by downloading and running the free demo version of EZNEC from: http://www.eznec.com You will find the radiation angle of a longwire cannot be known with the information that you furnished. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Crudely, the lobes in the radiation patterns of the antennas you mention, inevitably distorted by the local environment, are so broad they can be considered largely omni-directional, except that purely vertical antennas always have a vertical null and horizontal antennas don't radiate quite so well in line with the wire as they do broadside to the wire. The type of local ground also has a disturbing effect. As people seldom know what type of soil they have it's somewhat statistically unpredictable. Which all adds to the fun. The term "radiation angle" doesn't really apply, its a misnomer, until you have a high, multi-element, directional beam antenna which EZNEC (a computer program) can get its teeth into. --- Reg, G4FGQ =================================== "Richard" wrote in message ... Could someone tell me what the radiation angles of the following aerials (roughly) a Half wave dipole Quarter wave verticle Longwire TIA, Richard |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
By radiation angles, I have read that a 5/8 has about 15 degree )so good for
DXing), and a quarter wave about 25 degress, but I am not sure if that is correct. What roughly is the angle that a dipole radiates? Richard "Richard" wrote in message ... Could someone tell me what the radiation angles of the following aerials (roughly) a Half wave dipole Quarter wave verticle Longwire TIA, Richard |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 07:44:31 +0200, "Richard"
wrote: By radiation angles, I have read that a 5/8 has about 15 degree )so good for DXing), It also works nearly as well at 14 degrees or 16 degrees. And of course only slightly worse at 13 degrees or 17 degrees (you couldn't tell the difference at, say, 12 degrees or 18 degrees). And at 10 degrees or 20 degrees its not too shabby either, and probably as good as 45 degrees (but maybe not, hard to tell). and a quarter wave about 25 degress, but I am not sure if that is correct. About, or perhaps it is 28 degrees or 15 degrees. What roughly is the angle that a dipole radiates? Most of them. Actually it works best straight up into the clouds, but that doesn't mean it is worse than a vertical at 20 degrees. Funny about these things.... Which is better: ski boots or an ottoman? Hi Richard, It is all a continuum where eventually in comparison to the best angle, some angles are obviously worse. If you are going to name one angle (and it is done quite frequently here) you have to keep in mind that this in no way defines an antenna rigorously. It is more a shorthand. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:26:14 +0200, "Richard"
wrote: Could someone tell me what the radiation angles of the following aerials (roughly) a Half wave dipole Quarter wave verticle Longwire These are quite irrelevant questions, unless you specify the height of the antenna (in wavelengths) and the characteristics of the ground (mainly conductivity) at the frequency of interest. For instance a horizontal dipole more than 10 wavelengths above ground would have quite omnidirectional pattern in the vertical pattern, but nulls in the direction of the elements. Of course, this can be a bit hard to implement on 135 kHz, but not a real problem on 1,3 GHz :-) Paul OH3LWR |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard wrote:
What roughly is the angle that a dipole radiates? By "angle that a dipole radiates" do you mean the angle of maximum radiation? If so, it depends upon the height and length of the dipole among other things. Download the free version of EZNEC and see for yourself. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier:
By "angle that a dipole radiates" do you mean the angle of maximum radiation? If so, it depends upon the height and length of the dipole among other things. ______________ To be more exact, a linear (1/2-wave) dipole produces maximum radiation at all angles perpendicular to its center. But as suggested by the quote above, radiation from the driven element along with the distance, geometry, and electrical characteristics of nearby conductors (including the earth) will determine the final pattern of the radiated signal. R. Fry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Serious radiation questin | Antenna | |||
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna | |||
Radiation Resistance & Efficiency | Antenna | |||
Incoming radiation angles | Antenna | |||
Measuring radiation resistance | Antenna |