Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 29th 04, 02:13 PM
BCcubed
 
Posts: n/a
Default Copper antennas:

Hello all,

I am new to SWL, ham radio and I have am wondering if I could recreate some of
the high end antennas that I see in catalogs in copper tubing? I would
imagine that copper can be quite a bit heavier than stainless steel or
aluminum. Are there any differences in reception? Does anyone know a good
resource to learn more?

Thanks,

Mickey
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 29th 04, 02:32 PM
Scott
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There probably isn't even a perceptible difference in reception between
aluminum, copper or stainless. Copper is easy to work with at VHF and
above because you are dealing with fairly short sections. A copper yagi
for 20 Meters, for example, would be quite unwieldy. The nicest thing
about copper is that it is easy to make feedline connections to
it...solder works fine. With the other metals, you need to rely more on
mechanical connections such as ring lugs, bolts and nuts, etc. What
band of frequencies are you planning to build for?

The ARRL Antenna Book is a good place to start learning about antennas.
You should be able to find it at http://www.arrl.org
and order online there as well.

Another site is http://ac6v.com/swl.htm#ANT if you are looking for SWL
antennas.

Scott


BCcubed wrote:
Hello all,

I am new to SWL, ham radio and I have am wondering if I could recreate some of
the high end antennas that I see in catalogs in copper tubing? I would
imagine that copper can be quite a bit heavier than stainless steel or
aluminum. Are there any differences in reception? Does anyone know a good
resource to learn more?

Thanks,

Mickey


--
Scott
http://corbenflyer.tripod.com/
Building RV-4
Gotta Fly or Gonna Die

  #3   Report Post  
Old August 29th 04, 02:37 PM
K9SQG
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mickey,

Stainless steel is not as good a conductor as copper. It is used for
mechanical reasons primarily.

Evan
  #4   Report Post  
Old August 29th 04, 05:02 PM
Ralph Mowery
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I am new to SWL, ham radio and I have am wondering if I could recreate
some of
the high end antennas that I see in catalogs in copper tubing? I would
imagine that copper can be quite a bit heavier than stainless steel or
aluminum. Are there any differences in reception? Does anyone know a

good
resource to learn more?


Copper is the best except for silver. The problems with either is the cost
and mechanical strength. Wind will usually bend copper tubing and it will
not spring back like the antenna grade aluminum.
There is a very slight (probably not even enough to notice) differance for
the beter with copper over SS or aluminum.
If you can keep the wind dammagd down , then go with the copper tubing.


  #5   Report Post  
Old August 29th 04, 05:25 PM
Irv Finkleman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BCcubed wrote:

Hello all,

I am new to SWL, ham radio and I have am wondering if I could recreate some of
the high end antennas that I see in catalogs in copper tubing? I would
imagine that copper can be quite a bit heavier than stainless steel or
aluminum. Are there any differences in reception? Does anyone know a good
resource to learn more?

Thanks,

Mickey


Weight considerations aside, if you are building a copper antenna with
soldered fittings, use silver solder. The normal resin-core solder will
not stand up to vibration from wind and other things.

Irv
--
--------------------------------------
Diagnosed Type II Diabetes March 5 2001
Beating it with diet and exercise!
297/215/210 (to be revised lower)
58"/43"(!)/44" (already lower too!)
--------------------------------------
Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/
Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/
Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/
--------------------
Irv Finkleman,
Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP
Calgary, Alberta, Canada


  #6   Report Post  
Old August 29th 04, 06:28 PM
Gary V. Deutschmann, Sr.
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Mickey

Copper is GREAT for Antenna's!
It's only slightly heavier than Aluminum.
But their are MAJOR advantages to using copper.
Solid corrosion free joints is only one of them.

There are three (without getting technical) basic copper tubing types
available. Soft Copper (easily bendable), Hard Copper (water pipes,
which can be swedged under heat), and Annealed Copper (refrigeration
tubing).
Regular Hard Copper water tubing is sufficient for most antenna work.
But if your building something like a long Yagi, you definately will
want to use Anneled Copper for the boom or you will wake up with
U-shaped Yagi one morning.
You can also often work in smaller pipe sizes when using the Annealed
Copper as well. Such as 1/2 inch Annealed instead of 3/4 inch Hard.
Even the soft copper comes in handy for some non-supporting components
such as coils and the like.

When joining copper using fittings or swedged joints use either
standard plumbing methods or preferrably silver solder in these
joints. When building things like Yagi's where you may be passing the
elements through the boom without using fittings, copper phosphorus
bronze brazing rods work at propane torch temperatures and make a more
secure joint than silver solder on these types of connections.

Where electrical connections need to be made (and often may need
changing or maintenance) I found that adding a soft copper tube or
heavy copper wire, affixing it to the antenna with copper phosphorus
bronze, allows a good soldering gun and rosin core solder to make the
electrical connection to the pigtail installed for this purpose.

TTUL - 73+ de Gary - KGØZP


  #7   Report Post  
Old August 29th 04, 08:04 PM
Allodoxaphobia
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:02:10 GMT, Ralph Mowery hath writ:
I am new to SWL, ham radio and I have am wondering if I could recreate

some of
the high end antennas that I see in catalogs in copper tubing? I would
imagine that copper can be quite a bit heavier than stainless steel or
aluminum. Are there any differences in reception? Does anyone know a
good resource to learn more?


Copper is the best except for silver.


Well, there's gold. HI!HI!

The problems with either is the cost and mechanical strength.


Same problems -- only worse.

73
Jonesy
  #9   Report Post  
Old August 30th 04, 12:33 PM
Gary S.
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:28:06 +0300, Paul Keinanen
wrote:

Due to the skin effect, RF currents only flow on the surface of the
conductor. At VHF frequencies, the skin depth in copper is only about
5 um, in which nearly all RF currents flow, thus the low resistivity
of this thin surface layer is critical. From RF point of view, it does
not matter much what is below this surface, so it might be empty (a
tube) or it might be something with lower conductivity, such as
stainless steel (with much greater mechanical strength).

Another plus of this is used in some high-powered industrial equipment
that uses RF, and I believe some broadcast equipment. For cooling,
copper tubing is used as the RF conductor (skin effect only) and water
is pumped through the inside. A few tricks of the trade, like using
pure water without dissolved ions, and connecting the plumbing with
non-metal parts to isolate the RF, are involved.

Sometimes the copper is plated with silver, not so much for better
conductivity as the better oxidation properties of exposed silver.
Gold would be a bit better, even if a lot tougher on the budget.

Happy trails,
Gary (net.yogi.bear)
------------------------------------------------
at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence

Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom
  #10   Report Post  
Old August 30th 04, 03:42 PM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gary Schwartz wrote:
"For cooling, copper tubing is used as the RF conductor (skin effect
only) and water is pumped through the inside."

That`s exactly the structure of the final amplifier tank coil of the
100KW GE watercooled shortwave transmitters used at RFE. The coil was
silver plated. We distilled our own cooling water and the water
circulation system was connected by Saran tubing. Though many KV were
applied to the plates, d-c leakage was insignificant.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 11:22 PM
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. Ben Antenna 0 January 6th 04 01:18 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 04:01 PM
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? totojepast Antenna 16 September 21st 03 08:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017