Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Philadelphia is considering a wireless Internet system that would
blanket the entire city via hundreds of small transmitters. See http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...es_7&printer=1 Would this interfere with ham radio? Sounds like a possible nice alternative to BPL :-) Bob k5qwg |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Would this interfere with ham radio? Sounds like a possible nice alternative to BPL :-) Bob k5qwg Unless we have bad harmonics way up on microwaves, it should not. Looks like NYC already has WiFi distribution, you can see WiFi Hotspot antennas on the top of the public phone booths. Yuri, K3BU.us |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Miller" wrote in message ... Philadelphia is considering a wireless Internet system that would blanket the entire city via hundreds of small transmitters. See http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...es_7&printer=1 Would this interfere with ham radio? Sounds like a possible nice alternative to BPL :-) Bob k5qwg =========================== It's not the UHF frequency of the very local mini transmitters which cause the interference. It is the broadband signals which come in via the phone wires between computer and the local telephone exchange. They mostly affect the 160 and 80 meter bands. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Yuri Blanarovich" wrote in message ... Would this interfere with ham radio? Sounds like a possible nice alternative to BPL :-) Bob k5qwg Unless we have bad harmonics way up on microwaves, it should not. Looks like NYC already has WiFi distribution, you can see WiFi Hotspot antennas on the top of the public phone booths. Yuri, K3BU.us This would cause US to interfere with the computers. "Each would be capable of communicating with the wireless networking cards that now come standard with many computers. " Isn't this all 802.11 which is up at 2+ GHz and above? -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Firstly, why do you think it would interfere?
"Bob Miller" wrote in message ... Philadelphia is considering a wireless Internet system that would blanket the entire city via hundreds of small transmitters. See http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...es_7&printer=1 Would this interfere with ham radio? Sounds like a possible nice alternative to BPL :-) Bob k5qwg --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.746 / Virus Database: 498 - Release Date: 31/08/2004 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
"Bob Miller" Philadelphia is considering a wireless Internet system that would blanket the entire city via hundreds of small transmitters. Damn communists... ;-) Would this interfere with ham radio? Aren't such "wireless" systems typically on the unlicensed 2.45GHz 'microwave oven' band? In any case, such a system shouldn't cause any significant out-of-band interference. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= *** Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If done like Chaska MN, it would be using 1 watt 802.11G transmitters
with 6 dBd vertically polarized antennas. The system is a mesh network fed from relatively few points. These systems transmit only when traffic needs to be passed. The density varies from about 8 to 20 transmitters per square mile from what I've been told by the city. I have heard of no complaints from weak signal 1296 users in the area, and I am a member of the local VHF/UHF/uwave club. tom K0TAR Bob Miller wrote: Philadelphia is considering a wireless Internet system that would blanket the entire city via hundreds of small transmitters. See http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...es_7&printer=1 Would this interfere with ham radio? Sounds like a possible nice alternative to BPL :-) Bob k5qwg |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oops, I meant 2.4 gigs.
tom K0TAR Bob Miller wrote: Philadelphia is considering a wireless Internet system that would blanket the entire city via hundreds of small transmitters. See http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...es_7&printer=1 Would this interfere with ham radio? Sounds like a possible nice alternative to BPL :-) Bob k5qwg |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg, G4FGQ wrote:
"---the result of deliberate poisoning and bombing by a country which imagines itself, not unsurprisingly, to have international enemies." If the French had despensed their responsibilities in French Indo-China properly, there would have been no danger of an iterative collapse of dominoes to communism in the region. The U.S. would not have offered help to a corrupt anticommunist regime which squandered the help it received. The tragedy reminds me of the old story of the knight who hurries home to report to his king that he has slain or subdued all of the king`s enemies in a neighboring kingdom. The king replies that he has no enemies in the neighboring kingdom. The knight corrects the king by saying, "You do now sir!" Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
messing with a car radio | Antenna | |||
What Exactly is a Radio Wave? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Antenna | |||
Cecil's Math a Blunder | Antenna |