Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#91
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:44:12 -0700, "Chuck"
wrote: [snip] | |Perhaps you should argue this with |Dr. Ken Asmus, VA3KA , a scientist who |conducted a shoot-out in Canada... I'm sure that Dr. Asmus is a fine fellow, all-around good guy and he no longer beats his wife. But the minute I hear, "the RB-36x was 1-2 S units stronger", science has gone out the window and bafflegab has blown in. [snip] | |It seems inconsistent that you repeatedly |cry "unsubstantiated" then refuse to |consider substance. Though I suppose |if you bothered to check out the contest |records, it may raise havoc with your |unsubstantiated opinions, perhaps?... hi Contest records are not "substance." Comparative measurements on a calibrated antenna range would be substance. I will consider them. SK N7WS |
#92
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Wes Stewart wrote in message ... On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:44:12 -0700, "Chuck" wrote: [snip] | |Perhaps you should argue this with |Dr. Ken Asmus, VA3KA , a scientist who |conducted a shoot-out in Canada... I'm sure that Dr. Asmus is a fine fellow, all-around good guy and he no longer beats his wife. But the minute I hear, "the RB-36x was 1-2 S units stronger", science has gone out the window and bafflegab has blown in. Wes, You demean a scientist merely to feed your perverted ego and maintain your narrow-minded preconceptions? Where is the intellectual honesty in that? Where is the science in that? You demonstrate the only kind of science you support is that which confirms your silly preconceptions, despite reality. Which would imply, had the comparison gone the other way, you'd have accepted that data unquestioned. Hypocrisy has no standing in real science. [snip] | |It seems inconsistent that you repeatedly |cry "unsubstantiated" then refuse to |consider substance. Though I suppose |if you bothered to check out the contest |records, it may raise havoc with your |unsubstantiated opinions, perhaps?... hi Contest records are not "substance." Comparative measurements on a calibrated antenna range would be substance. I will consider them. Since you've established that your mind is an impenetrable brick, I'd venture to say you'd reject test range data outright, if it failed to meet your silly preconceptions. Do you still live in Tucson? Just a 100 miles south of me... If so, I invite you to consider this: Let me know the next time you're on 17m... I'd be happy to blow your silly 3 el yagi away with my measly 2 elements... Have a nice... 73 de Chuck, WA7RAI SK N7WS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stainless steel antenna wire | Antenna | |||
EZNEC v. 4.0 at Dayton | Antenna | |||
Adding lengths to bare wire antenna? | Antenna | |||
3 antennas modeled with EZNEC | Antenna | |||
randon wire newbie question | Antenna |