Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
New at this. Do sw listening only (no transmitting) up to 30 MHz. Like to listen at most all freq's. Have a random-length simple wire strung around the 4 sides of the attic. Same wire is fed down a floor into radio. It's open at the end; NOT connected back to beginning of attic run to form a loop. I know I can try it and see, but frankly it's getting hard for me now to crawl around up there. Would you expect better performance if it was formed into a loop ? Why ? (what "theory" or eq's would apply ?) Thanks, Bob |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
i would do lots of very detailed calculations, lots of computer modelling,
and measure it with every instrument i could find to be sure it has exactly the pattern predicted and the right impedance across the whole hf band so the receiver would work properly. then after months of computing and modeling and measuring i would hook it up and it would work the same as it would work if i had hooked it up without doing any of that. a random length wire, in close proximity to buildings with wiring and other unknown metal stuff can not be adequetely modeled over even a small range of frequencies, let alone 'most all freqs'. so hook it up and try it, if it lets you hear what you want then leave it alone. if it doesn't then try adding another wire out the window or around the floor or hook up your bedsprings. "Robert11" wrote in message ... Hi, New at this. Do sw listening only (no transmitting) up to 30 MHz. Like to listen at most all freq's. Have a random-length simple wire strung around the 4 sides of the attic. Same wire is fed down a floor into radio. It's open at the end; NOT connected back to beginning of attic run to form a loop. I know I can try it and see, but frankly it's getting hard for me now to crawl around up there. Would you expect better performance if it was formed into a loop ? Why ? (what "theory" or eq's would apply ?) Thanks, Bob |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert11" wrote in message ... Would you expect better performance if it was formed into a loop ? Why ? (what "theory" or eq's would apply ?) I have found that this reduces low frequency pick-up. Loops need to be approaching 1 wavelength around to work efficiently, whereas the wire would be OK as a 1/4 wave. As to whether the signal to noise ratio will be better with the loop - well you'll just need to experiment ; ) 73, Peter VK3YE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Will displacement current form a close loop ? | Antenna | |||
Technical question for receiving TV signals by a loop Antenna | Antenna | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna |