Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, April 26, 1998 at 12:00:00 AM UTC-7, Marshall Johnson, Sr. wrote:
---You are correct, the two antennas you mention are nearly identical. The Mosely antenna is just slightly better built than the Cushcraft. However, before you consider either of these antennas, take look at the three element antenna from Force 12. No loading coils or traps...and can be expanded to include 40 meters if the need arises. Force 12 makes an entire line of "butt-kickin'" antennas. TTFN 73 Marsh KK7CW Ian Procyk wrote: Hello I'm looking around at some smaller sized tribanders. I was wondering if anyone out there has any thoughts on the cushcraft a3s beam or the mosley ta-33. They are both about the same price and I was just wondering if one is better than the other. I plan to use a cd-45-ii rotor on which ever antenna I get. Will that rotor work? -THNX! -VE7HHS Vancouver BC My USED TA33 rotated by a CD 45II lasted 27 years in Cal Central Valley until a tree fell on it. It would have lasted another 20 years had it not been for the nasty storm that toppled the tree right on the boom. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
cushcraft a3s or mosley ta-33? | Antenna | |||
Mosley TA-63 | Equipment | |||
Wanted Mosley WARC Kit for Mosley CL-33-M Beam | Boatanchors | |||
Mosley NOS, TA-53M | Homebrew |