Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Harrison" wrote Jack Painter wrote: "Here is where you are mixing apples and oranges because ground loops and lightning protection are not related." -- A ground loop is a potentially detrimental condition due to two or more points in an elewctrical system that are nominally at ground potential being connected by a conducting path. Ground connections for protected equipments can be made with individual wires between each of the devices and a common ground point to avoid ground loops. This is not always practical. It is usually practical to enclose devices inside a conductive enclosure, then to low-pass filter and surge protect every wire which penetrates the enclosure. -- Hi Richard, had I thought that was a controversial statement, I could have elaborated that elimination of ground loops is normally a radio frequency interference issue, and the creation of at least one ground loop is a design requirement in residential lightning protection. The two are not usually discussed together unless a conflict ocurrs, but I see your point. It is indeed a requirement to individually bond equipment to the single point station ground...and yes, practicality allows certain clusters of equipment to be common bonded within their enclosures as you commented. But the one place where a ground loop *must* be installed is in the station ground to electrical service ground bonding. Proper station design requires these never be far apart from each other in the first place, but we are talking about residential stations, and close proximity between them is rarely possible. Telecom stations that cannot individually bond thousands of cards or even hundreds of racks use high voltage isolation transformers and/or fiber optic isolation from station ground entirely. Residences typically have neither close proximity to AC service ground, not the financial ability to utilize fiber or other HV isolation, so living with at least one ground loop is a requirement. This has been reported to cause problems in some zero-volt ground reference computing equipment, and isolated grounding is authorized under certain conditions for that case only. I have not seen comments about radio frequency interference from ground loop(s) caused by lightning protection design. If they occur, perhaps they are easily choked with standard RF control devices. I use those extensively anyway, so maybe that chokes any ground loop problem, if one ever existed. Thanks for your comments as always, Jack |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:46:19 GMT, Irv Finkleman
wrote: Just wondeing -- is the spring salt water? :-) The neighborhood use to be orchard. I haven't tasted the water, but I bet it is fresh water. Remember now, we are speaking about Rain City - Seattle (although we do have an extensive view of Puget Sound which is only several blocks, downhill, away). As I can easily see the water line 6 feet below grade (through the well shaft), I've no doubt of what may follow if I were to puncture this raft. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Outbacker Perth grounding question | Antenna | |||
Outbacker Perth grounding question | Antenna | |||
newbie question, grounding | Antenna | |||
Antenna mast grounding question | Antenna | |||
Grounding question - this is wierd..... | Antenna |