Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello HAMmers
![]() I want to build an internal WLAN antenna for my notebook computer to be placed in the screen. The available space is 163 x 12 mm. A quarter wavelength at 2442.5 MHz is 30.7 mm. I haven't been able to find much info about microstrip design so I hope you might be able to give some suggestions as to a good design. I have thought about 'stretching' a bi-quad to fit the dimensions, but then the angles cannot be 90°. Would that be a problem? Can you suggest a better design to try? This is my first antenna design so please bear with me if these are beginner questions. Thanks -- Kasper |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 23:43:18 +0100, "Kasper Vibe Grevsen"
wrote: The available space is 163 x 12 mm. A quarter wavelength at 2442.5 MHz is 30.7 mm. Hi Kasper, I haven't been able to find much info about microstrip design so I hope you might be able to give some suggestions as to a good design. The standard half-wave dipole comes to mind as it so easily fits into your available space. I have thought about 'stretching' a bi-quad to fit the dimensions Why introduce problems when a simple solution exists? Or, as Einstein expressed it: "keep it simple, but not too simple." 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" skrev i en meddelelse ... On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 23:43:18 +0100, "Kasper Vibe Grevsen" wrote: The available space is 163 x 12 mm. A quarter wavelength at 2442.5 MHz is 30.7 mm. Hi Kasper, The standard half-wave dipole comes to mind as it so easily fits into your available space. Hi Richard, thanks for your suggestion, that means a T-shape as I understand? The horizontal part should be 2 x 30,7 mm, right? How long should the vertical line be? How wide should I make the tracks? The cable is a 50 ohm coax. -- med venlig hilsen Unlock Ã…rhus - www.unlockaarhus.dk Kasper Vibe Grevsen Tlf 30 222 123 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:28:39 +0100, "Kasper Vibe Grevsen"
wrote: thanks for your suggestion, that means a T-shape as I understand? The horizontal part should be 2 x 30,7 mm, right? How long should the vertical line be? How wide should I make the tracks? The cable is a 50 ohm coax. Hi Klaus, Although perfection requires precision and accuracy, your application does not demand perfection. Besides, it is unlikely you are either technically prepared to measure the properties of the antenna, nor buy equipment that could do it simpler. There are any number of factors that would impact the measurements you describe above and one is simply building the antenna on a piece of PC board (why not simply use wire?). Another point is that the dipole is a "balanced" design, and your source of radiation is undoubtedly "unbalanced." This, of course, probably means nothing to you, and fortunately it has meant nothing to many who have ignored this distinction too (which underlines that perfection is not required in ordinary, day-to-day usage). Also, you don't include enough information to offer an exact solution. However, to answer your question by the parts: Yes it is T shaped (see ASCII graphic below with fixed font); Yes, the horizontal part should be about 2 x 30,7 mm; The vertical lineS should be as long as they take to reach the source and the ground; The Horizontal tracks could be as wide as 1mm - if you make them wider this reduces your need for precision if you wanted to be perfect; If you are going to use 50 Ohm cable, you don't need vertical leads. The pictorial equivalent (view with fixed font setting): ----------- ----------- | | | | | | | | | | Returning to issues of perfection. If you encounter problems of reception/transmission, they will be more due to the antenna orientation and placement than they will be due to power level. Back when we lived in caves, TV came through the air instead of through a cable. We had rituals to adjust Rabbit Ear antennas (a pagan WiMax shrine) until the picture got better. You are about to embark in that same arcane practice - welcome to a brave new world. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kasper Vibe Grevsen" wrote in
message ... Hi Kasper, The standard half-wave dipole comes to mind as it so easily fits into your available space. Hi Richard, thanks for your suggestion, that means a T-shape as I understand? The horizontal part should be 2 x 30,7 mm, right? How long should the vertical line be? How wide should I make the tracks? The cable is a 50 ohm coax. It is a lot simpler than that... A half wave dipole would be two tracks approx 30.7mm long as you say. But.. you do not need a vertical line. Coax can attach directly to the centre point. Width of the tracks also depends on how much space you have. The wider the tracks the bigger the bandwidth affected. Also what may effect the whole installation is the polarisation of the antenna, horizontal or vertical. This depends on the antenna on the other device. Same polarisation recommended! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |