Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 22nd 04, 04:56 AM
Dr. Slick
 
Posts: n/a
Default Answer to Dipole Double-Resonance Problem

Hi,

Ok, so the other thread died out, but
I thought i should give the other answer
anyhow.

One poster infered one portion of the
fix, which was the height of the dipole
was increased from 3.5 ft to 6.5 ft.

The other change we made was with
the spacing BETWEEN the 1/4 wave
elements; i had originally made the
elements too far apart.

Bringing them closer together and
raising the height improved the SWR
and made the antenna resonant at
only one frequency within 88-108 MHz
(not including harmonics).

Thanks for playing!


Slick
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 22nd 04, 04:31 PM
Tam/WB2TT
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dr. Slick" wrote in message
om...
Hi,

Ok, so the other thread died out, but
I thought i should give the other answer
anyhow.

One poster infered one portion of the
fix, which was the height of the dipole
was increased from 3.5 ft to 6.5 ft.

The other change we made was with
the spacing BETWEEN the 1/4 wave
elements; i had originally made the
elements too far apart.

Bringing them closer together and
raising the height improved the SWR
and made the antenna resonant at
only one frequency within 88-108 MHz
(not including harmonics).

Thanks for playing!


Slick


Did you measure the original distance tip-to-tip, or did you measure 2X the
length of one side independent of the spacing in the middle?

Tam/WB2TT


  #5   Report Post  
Old November 23rd 04, 01:24 AM
Dr. Slick
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tam/WB2TT" wrote in message ...

Did you measure the original distance tip-to-tip, or did you measure 2X the
length of one side independent of the spacing in the middle?

Tam/WB2TT



I'm not sure what you mean here.

I made sure that the end-to-end length of
each 1/4 wavelength section was the same
size for each section of the dipole. We
use aluminum tubing and hoseclamps for
adjusting the length.

But when i adjusted the space between
the two sections, the length of each
section was NOT changed.

And yet the SWR improved, and
there was a single resonance between
88-108 Megs, as it should normally be.


Slick
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 11:22 PM
DOUBLE RESONANCE IN DIPOLE...THE CAUSE????? Dr. Slick Antenna 57 November 17th 04 04:02 AM
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. Ben Antenna 0 January 6th 04 01:18 AM
Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? Xtx99 Antenna 2 November 26th 03 01:11 AM
Bricks effect in dipole resonance? Help! Roy Lewallen Antenna 14 August 25th 03 07:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017