Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Ok, so the other thread died out, but I thought i should give the other answer anyhow. One poster infered one portion of the fix, which was the height of the dipole was increased from 3.5 ft to 6.5 ft. The other change we made was with the spacing BETWEEN the 1/4 wave elements; i had originally made the elements too far apart. Bringing them closer together and raising the height improved the SWR and made the antenna resonant at only one frequency within 88-108 MHz (not including harmonics). Thanks for playing! Slick |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dr. Slick" wrote in message om... Hi, Ok, so the other thread died out, but I thought i should give the other answer anyhow. One poster infered one portion of the fix, which was the height of the dipole was increased from 3.5 ft to 6.5 ft. The other change we made was with the spacing BETWEEN the 1/4 wave elements; i had originally made the elements too far apart. Bringing them closer together and raising the height improved the SWR and made the antenna resonant at only one frequency within 88-108 MHz (not including harmonics). Thanks for playing! Slick Did you measure the original distance tip-to-tip, or did you measure 2X the length of one side independent of the spacing in the middle? Tam/WB2TT |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in message . ..
On 21 Nov 2004 19:56:40 -0800, (Dr. Slick) wrote: Bringing them closer together and raising the height improved the SWR Has absolutely nothing to do with: and made the antenna resonant at only one frequency within 88-108 MHz 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC God, you are truly lame. Go try it yourself. Slick |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tam/WB2TT" wrote in message ...
Did you measure the original distance tip-to-tip, or did you measure 2X the length of one side independent of the spacing in the middle? Tam/WB2TT I'm not sure what you mean here. I made sure that the end-to-end length of each 1/4 wavelength section was the same size for each section of the dipole. We use aluminum tubing and hoseclamps for adjusting the length. But when i adjusted the space between the two sections, the length of each section was NOT changed. And yet the SWR improved, and there was a single resonance between 88-108 Megs, as it should normally be. Slick |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
DOUBLE RESONANCE IN DIPOLE...THE CAUSE????? | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? | Antenna | |||
Bricks effect in dipole resonance? Help! | Antenna |