Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unearthed the previous fan of plumbers' copper microbore tubes
and associated ground rod to find a corroded and non conductive mess and raised the question of how to protect underground junctions from the worst that nature could throw at them? Firstly, resurrecting a technique from school metalwork lessons from 53 years ago when brazing things together, dig out the gas torch, soldering flux***** and solder and connect all together electrically. Secondly, to protect the now-relatively-massive joint, smear with petroleum grease. Was this a good idea, and is there something better? ***** Curious as to whether could be combined with one's radio interest to nake a flux capacitor to go time travellingg :-) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:46:55 +0100, Gareth's Downstairs Computer
wrote: Unearthed the previous fan of plumbers' copper microbore tubes and associated ground rod to find a corroded and non conductive mess and raised the question of how to protect underground junctions from the worst that nature could throw at them? Firstly, resurrecting a technique from school metalwork lessons from 53 years ago when brazing things together, dig out the gas torch, soldering flux***** and solder and connect all together electrically. Secondly, to protect the now-relatively-massive joint, smear with petroleum grease. Was this a good idea, and is there something better? ***** Curious as to whether could be combined with one's radio interest to nake a flux capacitor to go time travellingg :-) cathodic protection? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/09/2018 13:59, Rambo wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:46:55 +0100, Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote: Unearthed the previous fan of plumbers' copper microbore tubes and associated ground rod to find a corroded and non conductive mess and raised the question of how to protect underground junctions from the worst that nature could throw at them? Firstly, resurrecting a technique from school metalwork lessons from 53 years ago when brazing things together, dig out the gas torch, soldering flux***** and solder and connect all together electrically. Secondly, to protect the now-relatively-massive joint, smear with petroleum grease. Was this a good idea, and is there something better? ***** Curious as to whether could be combined with one's radio interest to nake a flux capacitor to go time travellingg :-) cathodic protection? Interesting because between the house TT earth, a steel rod and the copper RF earth is now about 0.4 volts, making the ohmmeter go haywire trying to measure the resistance between them. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Gareth's Downstairs Computer
writes On 06/09/2018 13:59, Rambo wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:46:55 +0100, Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote: Unearthed the previous fan of plumbers' copper microbore tubes and associated ground rod to find a corroded and non conductive mess and raised the question of how to protect underground junctions from the worst that nature could throw at them? Firstly, resurrecting a technique from school metalwork lessons from 53 years ago when brazing things together, dig out the gas torch, soldering flux***** and solder and connect all together electrically. Secondly, to protect the now-relatively-massive joint, smear with petroleum grease. Was this a good idea, and is there something better? ***** Curious as to whether could be combined with one's radio interest to nake a flux capacitor to go time travellingg :-) cathodic protection? Interesting because between the house TT earth, a steel rod and the copper RF earth is now about 0.4 volts, making the ohmmeter go haywire trying to measure the resistance between them. One way of assessing the effectiveness of an earth rod is to apply (from a transformer) an isolated low AC voltage between it and (say) the mains earth - and measure the current. Obviously, you've got to take into account the resistance of the connecting wires. -- Ian |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/09/2018 13:59, Rambo wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:46:55 +0100, Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote: Unearthed the previous fan of plumbers' copper microbore tubes and associated ground rod to find a corroded and non conductive mess and raised the question of how to protect underground junctions from the worst that nature could throw at them? Firstly, resurrecting a technique from school metalwork lessons from 53 years ago when brazing things together, dig out the gas torch, soldering flux***** and solder and connect all together electrically. Secondly, to protect the now-relatively-massive joint, smear with petroleum grease. Was this a good idea, and is there something better? ***** Curious as to whether could be combined with one's radio interest to nake a flux capacitor to go time travellingg :-) cathodic protection? Galvanising ! -- --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/09/2018 16:39, Catweazel wrote:
On 06/09/2018 13:59, Rambo wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:46:55 +0100, Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote: Unearthed the previous fan of plumbers' copper microbore tubes and associated ground rod to find a corroded and non conductive mess and raised the question of how to protect underground junctions from the worst that nature could throw at them? Firstly, resurrecting a technique from school metalwork lessons from 53 years ago when brazing things together, dig out the gas torch, soldering flux***** and solder and connect all together electrically. Secondly, to protect the now-relatively-massive joint, smear with petroleum grease. Was this a good idea, and is there something better? ***** Curious as to whether could be combined with one's radio interest to nake a flux capacitor to go time travellingg :-) cathodic protection? Galvanising ! Can't see how to do that when it's all still in the ground with just the ends showing :-) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:46:33 +0100, Gareth's Downstairs Computer
wrote: Interesting because between the house TT earth, a steel rod and the copper RF earth is now about 0.4 volts, making the ohmmeter go haywire trying to measure the resistance between them. That's only true if there's an electrolyte between the copper and steel. When bonded together, there's no galvanic action or voltage. If you're using two or more ground rods, all electrical codes specify that they need to be connected together with some heavy gauge wire. Ohmmeter? Use a ground resistance tester. Ask any electrician if you could borrow one: https://www.google.com/search?q=ground+resistance+tester https://www.fluke.com/en-us/products/electrical-testing/earth-ground https://www.fluke.com/en-us/learn/best-practices/electrical-inspection/earth-ground-testing-why-it-matters -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/09/2018 17:22, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:46:33 +0100, Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote: Interesting because between the house TT earth, a steel rod and the copper RF earth is now about 0.4 volts, making the ohmmeter go haywire trying to measure the resistance between them. That's only true if there's an electrolyte between the copper and steel. When bonded together, there's no galvanic action or voltage. If you're using two or more ground rods, all electrical codes specify that they need to be connected together with some heavy gauge wire. Separate RF earths to reduce noise on RX and protect family members from RF hazard if touching central heating radiator 1/4 wavelength away. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 18:14:51 +0100
Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote: On 06/09/2018 17:22, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:46:33 +0100, Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote: Interesting because between the house TT earth, a steel rod and the copper RF earth is now about 0.4 volts, making the ohmmeter go haywire trying to measure the resistance between them. That's only true if there's an electrolyte between the copper and steel. When bonded together, there's no galvanic action or voltage. If you're using two or more ground rods, all electrical codes specify that they need to be connected together with some heavy gauge wire. Separate RF earths to reduce noise on RX and protect family members from RF hazard if touching central heating radiator 1/4 wavelength away. Gareth, get some double glazing, Gareth, that would stop them huddling around the radiators, Gareth. Gareth, Thanks, Gareth. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/7/2018 9:06 AM, Stephen Thomas Troll wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 18:14:51 +0100 Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote: On 06/09/2018 17:22, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:46:33 +0100, Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote: Interesting because between the house TT earth, a steel rod and the copper RF earth is now about 0.4 volts, making the ohmmeter go haywire trying to measure the resistance between them. That's only true if there's an electrolyte between the copper and steel. When bonded together, there's no galvanic action or voltage. If you're using two or more ground rods, all electrical codes specify that they need to be connected together with some heavy gauge wire. Separate RF earths to reduce noise on RX and protect family members from RF hazard if touching central heating radiator 1/4 wavelength away. Gareth, get some double glazing, Gareth, that would stop them huddling around the radiators, Gareth. Gareth, Thanks, Gareth. I had a radiator that rusted through....just thought you would like to know that .... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Earth Rods? | Antenna | |||
CALCULATION OF EARTH RESISTANCE IN MULTI-LAYER EARTH STRUCTURE | Antenna | |||
CALCULATION OF EARTH RESISTANCE IN MULTI-LAYER EARTH STRUCTURE | Equipment | |||
FS: Earth Rods and clamps | Equipment | |||
FS: Earth Rods and clamps | Equipment |