Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:39:28 EST, "J.B. Wood"
wrote: Hello, all, and in addition to my recent posting on how the subject term came into usage (primarily by hams) there is another possible explanation: If we make a loop antenna electrically smaller and smaller (relative to a wavelength), we approach what the EM/antenna textbooks refer to as a "magnetic dipole". This is a mathematical construct (exists in the limit) but is useful for practical calculations as we approach such a limit. The E-field equivalent is an "electric dipole" I think this was what Jeff Liebermann alluded to in his recent post. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO, Nope. You give me too much credit. I'm not much of a mathemagician and much prefer easy to visualize mechanical constructs to complexicated mathematical equations. I'm also recovering from a "minor" medical procedure earlier today and therefore need to keep this brief (if possible). "Magnetic Loop Antennas Receiving" https://www.w8ji.com/magnetic_receiving_loops.htm "In the electrically small antennas, such as the loop antenna and the sort dipole or vertical described above, the dominant field descriptions only apply within 1/10 distance." "It is the energy storage or reactive induction field response within 1/10 wavelength distance from the antenna that gives small "magnetic loop" and "electric dipole" antennas their names." "Radiation in the Near Zone of a Small Loop Antenna" http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/smallloop.pdf "Within one wavelength of the current loop, the magnetic field looks essentially the same as the dipole field pattern due to a steady current loop, multiplied by cos wt." After that, there's far too much math for me to understand. From what I understand, when the antenna is quite small relative to the operating wavelength, and the measurement distance is really close compared to the operating wavelength, the antenna acts more like a inductively coupled transformer. I think that might be one source of the "magnetic" term. Another possible source is the assumption that in a shielded loop antenna, the shield blocks the E (electric) field, while the H (magnetic) field is unaffected. The assumption is that if the E field is blocked, what must be radiated is only the H field. There's a section in the above article that discusses the purpose and effects of shielding, which contradict the assumption. Anyway, those are my best guesses as to the origin of the term magnetic loop. I could use Google to search for the earliest use of the term magnetic loop. My guess(tm) is came from a ham radio application or publication. However, that will need to wait as I'm recovering today from a minor medical procedure and need to be horizontally polarized in bed for most of the next day. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|