Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I recently posted about my experience ordering, assemblying and installing an MQ26 antenna. After a couple of weeks using it, I thought I'd post some additional comments. The MQ26 replaced a vertical antenna, a Cushcraft MA5V. The first thing I noticed is the much reduced QRN... by several S units on 20 meters, which was nearly unusable at my location with the MA5V. Since I don't have the vertical installed anymore, I can't compared side by side while working the same remote station. However, the reduction in QRN lets me hear a lot of stuff that previously was drowned by the noise. I haven't noticed a big front to back difference, but there's definitely a difference to the sides. Overall, I am pleased with the antenna. It seems to work as advertised, it's fairly compact and lightweight, and assemblying it and installing it were relatively low impact tasks. I don't have any experience with other reduced size beams, so I can't offer any kind of meaningful comparison. 73, -jav w6vms |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MQ26 antenna mini-review | Antenna |