Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Miller wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 05:52:58 -0700, K7MEM wrote: David G. Nagel wrote: But, in the end, I don't have many complaints about XP and IE. I wish IE had a popup blocker like Netscape. The popups do get through, but I have never had a problem with throwing them away as soon as they pop up. I do highly recommend Netscape. I have found that it renders everything very closely to IE and FireFox. Some minor differences but nothing great. FYI, I have IE6, with Service Pack 2 (for XP Home Edition), and that includes a Microsoft pop-up blocker. It works better than StopZilla's blocker, and it's free. Bob k5qwg I also have IE6, but I run XP Pro with Service Pack 2. I have not found that the Microsoft pop-up blocker is better. I hit a site, a couple of months ago. Before I connected, my counter was around 900 popups blocked. The next time I looked at it, it was 9,000 popups blocked. I didn't even notice a glitch. This was with Netscape. With IE, I would not have been so lucky. IE has a lot of good points and is the most used browser. I develop my web pages using Netscape, but wouldn't publish any of them if I didn't first test them with IE. I run a monitor on my web site and IE has a 80 percent share of all browsers, but it is also the most targeted. Netscape is only running at 10-12 percent share, with all the rest filling in the last 8 percent. Netscape is also free. -- Martin E. Meserve - K7MEM http://www.k7mem.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|